Cake anyone?




its always time for cakeCAA Flagship wrote:Aaaaaaand that's the end of the first half of action. Time for a break.
Cake anyone?
Really? Who needs to grow up?mrklean wrote:Cluck U wrote:
And you, once again, demonstrated that you know you lost your argument (actually, both of them...I am married).![]()
![]()
BLACK IGNORANCE!...fully on display!
AGAIN another white bigot who will not grow the phuck up. Its 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IJS. Where did I Lie?Ibanez wrote:Really? Who needs to grow up?mrklean wrote:
AGAIN another white bigot who will not grow the phuck up. Its 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rhetorically speaking... we really aren't on the same planet here, are we Klean?mrklean wrote:CID1990 wrote:
We get it, Klean.
Justice means no black dudes are ever convicted of crimes, and all convictions prior to 1968 should be vacated because... racism
Hey Redneck, WHo the Phuck said this? Trust me, no Black man or Jewish Man(ask Leo Frank) would ever get off for rapping a white girl....NEVER!!!!!!

AGAIN another black racist who will not grow the phuck up. It is 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!mrklean wrote:Cluck U wrote:
And you, once again, demonstrated that you know you lost your argument (actually, both of them...I am married).![]()
![]()
BLACK IGNORANCE!...fully on display!
AGAIN another white bigot who will not grow the phuck up. Its 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cluck U wrote:AGAIN another black racist who will not grow the phuck up. It is 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!mrklean wrote:
AGAIN another white bigot who will not grow the phuck up. Its 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey klown, YOU are the one trumpeting the 14 year old's innocence, simply because he is black. That makes YOU the bigot/racist/ignorant one.

mrklean wrote:Cluck U wrote:
AGAIN another black racist who will not grow the phuck up. It is 2014 not 1914. PLEASE DO US A FAVOR...DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey klown, YOU are the one trumpeting the 14 year old's innocence, simply because he is black. That makes YOU the bigot/racist/ignorant one.
Yeah a 14 year old did this. Did you read the note on the case. No 14 year old could have killed thoses girls like this. The 14 year old did not have any scratches on him what so ever. You are the azz clown who belives he killed these two girls. Ok, you can go back to being a flaming bigot.

Exactly what evidence is missing?Cluck U wrote:
Justice was done...70 years ago.![]()
Confession? Check. Threats of violence? Check. Bully...thug background? Check.
And now people like klean...who know NOTHING about what happened...want a new trial when all of the evidence is gone.![]()
![]()
Here's an idea...why don't we just try EVERYONE twice...the second time 70 years later when the evidence is gone. WHAT A GREAT IDEA!
You telling Cluck to grow up and then blabbering "DIE!!!!"mrklean wrote:IJS. Where did I Lie?Ibanez wrote:
Really? Who needs to grow up?

Skjellyfetti wrote:Exactly what evidence is missing?Cluck U wrote:
Justice was done...70 years ago.![]()
Confession? Check. Threats of violence? Check. Bully...thug background? Check.
And now people like klean...who know NOTHING about what happened...want a new trial when all of the evidence is gone.![]()
![]()
Here's an idea...why don't we just try EVERYONE twice...the second time 70 years later when the evidence is gone. WHAT A GREAT IDEA!
He was convicted based mainly on the testimony of a deputy that said he confessed. There was never any physical evidence associated with the case -- he didn't actually sign a confession or anything.
The trial lasted two hours. The all white jury took 10 minutes to deliberate. No evidence was presented in his defense. There IS new evidence, however -- including three witnesses and an alibi.
I can agree that it doesn't seem like it's all that necessary to have a new trial... but, I don't think it's all that clear that he was guilty. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt, imo.

Like it's any better in Gawwgia? We've all seen The Green Mile.mrklean wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:
Exactly what evidence is missing?
He was convicted based mainly on the testimony of a deputy that said he confessed. There was never any physical evidence associated with the case -- he didn't actually sign a confession or anything.
The trial lasted two hours. The all white jury took 10 minutes to deliberate. No evidence was presented in his defense. There IS new evidence, however -- including three witnesses and an alibi.
I can agree that it doesn't seem like it's all that necessary to have a new trial... but, I don't think it's all that clear that he was guilty. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt, imo.
YEAH South Carolina Justice

Yeah, thats rightGrizalltheway wrote:Like it's any better in Gawwgia? We've all seen The Green Mile.mrklean wrote:
YEAH South Carolina Justice

Read the article.Skjellyfetti wrote:Exactly what evidence is missing?Cluck U wrote:
Justice was done...70 years ago.![]()
Confession? Check. Threats of violence? Check. Bully...thug background? Check.
And now people like klean...who know NOTHING about what happened...want a new trial when all of the evidence is gone.![]()
![]()
Here's an idea...why don't we just try EVERYONE twice...the second time 70 years later when the evidence is gone. WHAT A GREAT IDEA!
He was convicted based mainly on the testimony of a deputy that said he confessed. There was never any physical evidence associated with the case --

Derp.Cluck U wrote: Hey, let's have retrials for EVERYONE...70 years later!![]()
How do you think every one of those trails would go?

How does one go about rapping a white girl?mrklean wrote:CID1990 wrote:
We get it, Klean.
Justice means no black dudes are ever convicted of crimes, and all convictions prior to 1968 should be vacated because... racism
Hey Redneck, WHo the Phuck said this? Trust me, no Black man or Jewish Man(ask Leo Frank) would ever get off for rapping a white girl....NEVER!!!!!!

You start with two turntables and a microphoneHI54UNI wrote:How does one go about rapping a white girl?mrklean wrote:
Hey Redneck, WHo the Phuck said this? Trust me, no Black man or Jewish Man(ask Leo Frank) would ever get off for rapping a white girl....NEVER!!!!!!

and a white girl.CID1990 wrote:You start with two turntables and a microphoneHI54UNI wrote:
How does one go about rapping a white girl?

well, yeah.mrklean wrote:and a white girl.CID1990 wrote:
You start with two turntables and a microphone

CID1990 wrote:well, yeah.mrklean wrote: and a white girl.
To paraphrase John Cleese: "We'll take the white girl part as read, shall we?"

Man that's a small waistline. Very nice. I like small waistlines on women.CAA Flagship wrote:Aaaaaaand that's the end of the first half of action. Time for a break.
Cake anyone?


JohnStOnge wrote:Man that's a small waistline. Very nice. I like small waistlines on women.CAA Flagship wrote:Aaaaaaand that's the end of the first half of action. Time for a break.
Cake anyone?
You don't like a woman that knows where her waist is?mrklean wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:
Man that's a small waistline. Very nice. I like small waistlines on women.
You would like her

Ibanez wrote:You don't like a woman that knows where her waist is?mrklean wrote:
You would like her
I take that as a "I prefer fat ass, thunder thigh, big bitches. "mrklean wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
You don't like a woman that knows where her waist is?