NAU VS. SDSU

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:12 pm

Geeze Zenner is fast. This is the first time I've seen him play and I must admit I was influenced by racial tendencies. He's fast.

The Kicker · Post by **The Kicker** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:14 pm

Zenner loves the first round of the playoffs! How many yards did he have last year 300+?

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:19 pm

I think NAU is really missing having their head coach right now.

Bronco · Post by **Bronco** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:22 pm

I know a lot of time left but seems like the game is over

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:24 pm

Bronco wrote:I know a lot of time left but seems like the game is over

Well, NAU's pulled several wins out this season in this type of situation. Souers was on the sideline in those cases, though.

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:24 pm

I bet money that false start on SDSU just now was deliberate.

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:25 pm

If I were a SDSU fan I'd be wanting them to just give it to Zenner every play. Their receivers obviously don't match up well with NAU's secondary. They're not going to get open. They have a 9 point lead and Zenner obviously can take it the distance on any one play. I'd just be feeding him over and over again.

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:25 pm

Sheesh, NAU.

Theee Catrabbit · Post by **Theee Catrabbit** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:29 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:If I were a SDSU fan I'd be wanting them to just give it to Zenner every play. Their receivers obviously don't match up well with NAU's secondary. They're not going to get open. They have a 9 point lead and Zenner obviously can take it the distance on any one play. I'd just be feeding him over and over again.

You won't find a jacks fan who has a problem with this...I'm just glad everyone else gets a chance to appreciate him. Also appreciate the Bison have pretty much held him to less than 50 yards every game. Think about that.....

Post by **clenz** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:41 pm

So...about this big sky defense I've been hearing about

9.2 ypc....he averaged 4.2 in conference play.

It is no secret that zz is their entire offense....yet ooc teams can't handle him

.

Sent from my S4 using Tapatalk

Post by **EWURanger** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:42 pm

NAU's QB is just bad.

The Kicker · Post by **The Kicker** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:44 pm

[quote="clenz"]So...about this big sky defense I've been hearing about

9.2 ypc....he averaged 4.2 in conference play.

It is no secret that zz is their entire offense....yet ooc teams can't handle him

http://www.gojacks.com/fls/15000/stats/ ... lyr_31.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

117, 295, 128, 202 (NEB), 8 (NDSU), 112, 133, 138, 106, 137, 137, 186 and 200+ tonight.

Not a bad season at all!

Post by **EWURanger** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:45 pm

clenz wrote:So...about this big sky defense I've been hearing about

9.2 ypc....he averaged 4.2 in conference play.

It is no secret that zz is their entire offense....yet ooc teams can't handle him

.

Sent from my S4 using Tapatalk

That might have something to do with the 90 yarder he ripped off.

Post by **clenz** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:46 pm

Look at the ypc in the mvfc games.

Was over 5 ypc only twice...WIU and YSU

Two best games of the season for zz? Both Big Sky teams

It took him 30 carries in mvfc games to get to 120 yards or more...

Sent from my S4 using Tapatalk

JackJD · Post by **JackJD** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:46 pm

AZGrizFan wrote:NAU is much better in the dome, at elevation. Sioux Falls is 1,442 feet above sea level. They'll be sucking wind by halftime. NAU wins by 10.

????????? Pretty typical MVFC defense right now...not a lot of quit throughout the entire game.

Post by **EWURanger** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:49 pm

JackJD wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:NAU is much better in the dome, at elevation. Sioux Falls is 1,442 feet above sea level. They'll be sucking wind by halftime. NAU wins by 10.

????????? Pretty typical MVFC defense right now...not a lot of quit throughout the entire game.

You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Post by **Screamin_Eagle174** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:51 pm

Mvemjsunpx wrote:I think NAU is really missing having their head coach right now.

What happened to Souers?

The Kicker · Post by **The Kicker** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:51 pm

EWURanger wrote:
JackJD wrote:

????????? Pretty typical MVFC defense right now...not a lot of quit throughout the entire game.
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Good thing the Big Sky had two teams with byes so their fans will have at least one more week to feel shameful

Theee Catrabbit · Post by **Theee Catrabbit** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:55 pm

EWURanger wrote:
JackJD wrote:

????????? Pretty typical MVFC defense right now...not a lot of quit throughout the entire game.
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Wait is there elevation? I would enjoy another week of talking about how elevation affects the body.......

JackJD · Post by **JackJD** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:57 pm

EWURanger wrote:
JackJD wrote:

????????? Pretty typical MVFC defense right now...not a lot of quit throughout the entire game.
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Well, I guess you really told me. Fortunately, none of the idiot posters who were making the bold predictions early in this thread will have much to say about the outcome of this game or the one next week at EWU.

Post by **kalm** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:58 pm

The Kicker wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Good thing the Big Sky had two teams with byes so their fans will have at least one more week to feel shameful

Wanna take the dogs in either of those two games?

Post by **EWURanger** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:01 pm

Theee Catrabbit wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.

Wait is there elevation? I would enjoy another week of talking about how elevation affects the body.......

I wasn't involved in the elevation discussions. I don't think it makes much of a difference to be honest.

Post by **kalm** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:04 pm

JackJD wrote:
EWURanger wrote:
You will get a chance to prove how much better you are next weekend.
Well, I guess you really told me. Fortunately, none of the idiot posters who were making the bold predictions early in this thread will have much to say about the outcome of this game or the one next week at EWU.

Which bold predictions? Or is this the typical MVFC butthurt/we're disrespected/NDSU coattail tripe you see everywhere?

Nice win for SDSU. D looks tough and Zenner is really fast!

The Kicker · Post by **The Kicker** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:06 pm

kalm wrote:
The Kicker wrote:

Good thing the Big Sky had two teams with byes so their fans will have at least one more week to feel shameful
Wanna take the dogs in either of those two games?

I put the over under line at 2 wins for the big sky and all i got was a

In 2 weeks the big sky will be done. Eastern Washington is the best team in the Big Sky but I don't think they are a top 5 team and could be knocked out by anyone, even South Dakota State.

Mvemjsunpx · Post by **Mvemjsunpx** » Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:I think NAU is really missing having their head coach right now.
What happened to Souers?

Complications from back surgery. Couldn't make the game, apparently.

D-Coordinator pulling double duty can't be good, plus NAU seemed to really deflate after that 14-point swing that tied it at 7. Gotta wonder if that demoralization would've stuck with Souers on the field.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU

Re: NAU VS. SDSU