60 Minutes Segment on Benghazi

[houndawg]

11 attacks on consulates and embassies in seven countries between June, 2002 and September, 2008. Pakistan (3), Saudi Arabia (2), Uzbekistan, Syria, Greece, Turkey, Yemen (2).

59 killed, 98 injured.

Outrage from you and screwballs - nonexistent.

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on wikipedia for your replies.

And your source is......?

[Grizalltheway]

11 attacks on consulates and embassies in seven countries between June, 2002 and September, 2008. Pakistan (3), Saudi Arabia (2), Uzbekistan, Syria, Greece, Turkey, Yemen (2).

59 killed, 98 injured.

Outrage from you and screwballs - nonexistent.

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on wikipedia for your replies.

Great response, Professor Poindexter.

[houndawg]

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on wikipedia for your replies.

Great response, Professor Poindexter.

He got nothing, as usual...

[89Hen]

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on wikipedia for your replies.

Great response, Professor Poindexter.

I just know a good number of those dead were from the Yemen attack where no Americans were killed. And I'm not sure where there is evidence that nobody was outraged.

[houndawg]

Great response, Professor Poindexter.

I just know a good number of those dead were from the Yemen attack where no Americans were killed. And I'm not sure where there is evidence that nobody was outraged.

So you're saying that if an American embassy is attacked and people are killed but they aren't Americans, that's OK?

If you want to show me some posts where blueballs is outraged with the Bush administration over attacks on American embassies abroad I will publicly apologize to him here on this forum for being such a meanie.

[AZGrizFan]

Interesting how ASSGreaseFun and his pals suddenly find the mainstream media to be the gospel.

All these people knew the risks when they took these jobs. Don't conk fvcks ever stop whining and sniveling?

If it had been four black men left to die you'd be arranging a 50-man march on the capital as we speak.

[89Hen]

I just know a good number of those dead were from the Yemen attack where no Americans were killed. And I'm not sure where there is evidence that nobody was outraged.

So you're saying that if an American embassy is attacked and people are killed but they aren't Americans, that's OK?

If you want to show me some posts where blueballs is outraged with the Bush administration over attacks on American embassies abroad I will publicly apologize to him here on this forum for being such a meanie.

Nice try HD. YOU claimed "I believe we lost more diplomats during the Bush admin" and followed it up with those stats. Clearly you were trying to say that we had 59 diplomats, or at least Americans, killed. Sure, I'll find those posts from 2008.

[blueballs]

I just know a good number of those dead were from the Yemen attack where no Americans were killed. And I'm not sure where there is evidence that nobody was outraged.

So you're saying that if an American embassy is attacked and people are killed but they aren't Americans, that's OK?

If you want to show me some posts where blueballs is outraged with the Bush administration over attacks on American embassies abroad I will publicly apologize to him here on this forum for being such a meanie.

No need to you cocksucker... look at the date the board was brought on line you fucking asshole.

[houndawg]

So you're saying that if an American embassy is attacked and people are killed but they aren't Americans, that's OK?

If you want to show me some posts where blueballs is outraged with the Bush administration over attacks on American embassies abroad I will publicly apologize to him here on this forum for being such a meanie.

No need to you cocksucker... look at the date the board was brought on line you **** asshole.

Aww, gee, that's just downright uncharitable....

go ahead, assface, tell us how how furious you were with the Bush administration for not making the consulate in Karachi safer when US diplomat David Foy was specifically targeted and killed there in the third attack in three years.

Go pound sand you hypocrite sack of shit.

[houndawg]

So you're saying that if an American embassy is attacked and people are killed but they aren't Americans, that's OK?

If you want to show me some posts where blueballs is outraged with the Bush administration over attacks on American embassies abroad I will publicly apologize to him here on this forum for being such a meanie.

Nice try HD. YOU claimed "I believe we lost more diplomats during the Bush admin" and followed it up with those stats. Clearly you were trying to say that we had 59 diplomats, or at least Americans, killed. Sure, I'll find those posts from 2008.

You missed the point as usual, probably because its on the top of your head. One more time: where was your outrage during the Bush admin about the dozen attacks on US consulates and embassies? Not to mention the fact that there simply wasn't any help close enough for the Benghazi incident, no matter how badly you want to ignore that fact.

[89Hen]

go ahead, assface, tell us how how furious you were with the Bush administration for not making the consulate in Karachi safer when US diplomat David Foy was specifically targeted and killed there in the third attack in three years.

KARACHI, Pakistan — A suicide attacker rammed a car packed with explosives into a vehicle carrying an American diplomat in Pakistan’s largest city, killing four people — including the diplomat — ahead of President Bush’s visit to Pakistan.

Bush condemned the attack near the U.S. Consulate and a luxury hotel in Karachi, and said “terrorists and killers” would not prevent him from going to Pakistan on the final leg of his tour of South Asia.

HD, you are in way over your head.

[89Hen]

Nice try HD. YOU claimed "I believe we lost more diplomats during the Bush admin" and followed it up with those stats. Clearly you were trying to say that we had 59 diplomats, or at least Americans, killed. Sure, I'll find those posts from 2008.

You missed the point as usual, probably because its on the top of your head. One more time: where was your outrage during the Bush admin about the dozen attacks on US consulates and embassies? Not to mention the fact that there simply wasn't any help close enough for the Benghazi incident, no matter how badly you want to ignore that fact.

You were trying to show how many Americans were killed during the Bush years. Either admit you were wrong, or that you knowingly lied. Where did I say anything about having help close by in Benghazi?

[houndawg]

You missed the point as usual, probably because its on the top of your head. One more time: where was your outrage during the Bush admin about the dozen attacks on US consulates and embassies? Not to mention the fact that there simply wasn't any help close enough for the Benghazi incident, no matter how badly you want to ignore that fact.

You were trying to show how many Americans were killed during the Bush years. Either admit you were wrong, or that you knowingly lied. Where did I say anything about having help close by in Benghazi?

I was wrong about the number of Americans killed not about the number of deaths at US embassies and consulates, which seems to make a difference to you.. My comment about your boys hypocritical outrage stands.

[travelinman67]

..All these people knew the risks when they took these jobs...

"...these people..." were trained and told the United States State Department would have their backs if the shit hit the fan.

The United States State Department, even after being warned repeatedly that an attack was inevitable, did not protect or come to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans killed.

It is unconscionable that no one was held to account at State, and pathetic that ideologues would thoughtlessly defend this unjust failure.

Worse, Clinton's arrogance and refusal to cooperate with investigators is unprecedented for a SOS. Yet, there are still morons who'd back her for POTUS.

[SDHornet]

..All these people knew the risks when they took these jobs...

"...these people..." were trained and told the United States State Department would have their backs if the shit hit the fan.

The United States State Department, even after being warned repeatedly that an attack was inevitable, did not protect or come to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans killed.

It is unconscionable that no one was held to account at State, and pathetic that ideologues would thoughtlessly defend this unjust failure.

Worse, Clinton's arrogance and refusal to cooperate with investigators is unprecedented for a SOS. Yet, there are still morons who'd back her for POTUS.

Yup, this is the point lost. Instead folks result to throwing up a bunch of emoticons and other irrelevant quips while ignoring the main issue at hand. I laugh at the idea that no aid or reinforcements could have been brought in or that the Administration had no idea of events unfolding both pre-attack and during the attack. Mind you this was the same Administration that stealthily flew in a seal team into Pakistan and took out OBL all while watching it on live feed via satellite and drone surveillance…yeah no clue what was going on in Benghazi my ass.

[89Hen]

You were trying to show how many Americans were killed during the Bush years. Either admit you were wrong, or that you knowingly lied. Where did I say anything about having help close by in Benghazi?

I was wrong about the number of Americans killed not about the number of deaths at US embassies and consulates, which seems to make a difference to you.. My comment about your boys hypocritical outrage stands.

It makes a difference when it was a key part of your point.

[houndawg]

..All these people knew the risks when they took these jobs...

"...these people..." were trained and told the United States State Department would have their backs if the **** hit the fan.

The United States State Department, even after being warned repeatedly that an attack was inevitable, did not protect or come to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans killed.

It is unconscionable that no one was held to account at State, and pathetic that ideologues would thoughtlessly defend this unjust failure.

Worse, Clinton's arrogance and refusal to cooperate with investigators is unprecedented for a SOS. Yet, there are still morons who'd back her for POTUS.

And you don't think they were advised of the risks involved? I think maybe you got a different speech than they did.

[houndawg]

"...these people..." were trained and told the United States State Department would have their backs if the **** hit the fan.

The United States State Department, even after being warned repeatedly that an attack was inevitable, did not protect or come to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans killed.

It is unconscionable that no one was held to account at State, and pathetic that ideologues would thoughtlessly defend this unjust failure.

Worse, Clinton's arrogance and refusal to cooperate with investigators is unprecedented for a SOS. Yet, there are still morons who'd back her for POTUS.

Yup, this is the point lost. Instead folks result to throwing up a bunch of emoticons and other irrelevant quips while ignoring the main issue at hand. I laugh at the idea that no aid or reinforcements could have been brought in or that the Administration had no idea of events unfolding both pre-attack and during the attack. Mind you this was the same Administration that stealthily flew in a seal team into Pakistan and took out OBL all while watching it on live feed via satellite and drone surveillance…yeah no clue what was going on in Benghazi my ass.

You laugh at this because of your military expertise, SD? Would you care to enlighten as to which troops were available and could have been there in time? And why you disagree with the gentleman who was Secretary of Defense at the time?

[houndawg]

I was wrong about the number of Americans killed not about the number of deaths at US embassies and consulates, which seems to make a difference to you.. My comment about your boys hypocritical outrage stands.

It makes a difference when it was a key part of your point.

Not so, your Henness, the fact that so many people died at US consulates and embassies, Americans or not, indicates that consulates and embassies were less safe under the Bush admin. Since you missed the point again it was: Blueballs wasn't nearly as fired up, or fired up at all, while our turf was being attacked under the previous regime, he's just whining because it happened on Obama's watch. Since you are doing his speaking for him you should understand that so you could better address the point.

[DSUrocks07]

It makes a difference when it was a key part of your point.

Not so, your Henness, the fact that so many people died at US consulates and embassies, Americans or not, indicates that consulates and embassies were less safe under the Bush admin. Since you missed the point again it was: Blueballs wasn't nearly as fired up, or fired up at all, while our turf was being attacked under the previous regime, he's just whining because it happened on Obama's watch. Since you are doing his speaking for him you should understand that so you could better address the point.

And here you are, defending it for that very same reason.

[houndawg]

Not so, your Henness, the fact that so many people died at US consulates and embassies, Americans or not, indicates that consulates and embassies were less safe under the Bush admin. Since you missed the point again it was: Blueballs wasn't nearly as fired up, or fired up at all, while our turf was being attacked under the previous regime, he's just whining because it happened on Obama's watch. Since you are doing his speaking for him you should understand that so you could better address the point.

And here you are, defending it for that very same reason.

Wrong again.

I'm not doing anything other than pointing out scrueballs hypocrisy and suggesting where his outrage really comes from. Which, btw, he has yet to deny or to offer any reason at all for why he doesn't accept the word of the military commanders nearest the situation or for his deep-seated and virulent hatred of everything Obama.

(In fact, not that you'd be interested in those, the chain of command right up to the Seretary of Defense says there was no ability to get there in time to make a difference even if planes and troops had been packed and ready, which they weren't. )

[AZGrizFan]

Yup, this is the point lost. Instead folks result to throwing up a bunch of emoticons and other irrelevant quips while ignoring the main issue at hand. I laugh at the idea that no aid or reinforcements could have been brought in or that the Administration had no idea of events unfolding both pre-attack and during the attack. Mind you this was the same Administration that stealthily flew in a seal team into Pakistan and took out OBL all while watching it on live feed via satellite and drone surveillance…yeah no clue what was going on in Benghazi my ass.

You laugh at this because of your military expertise, SD? Would you care to enlighten as to which troops were available and could have been there in time? And why you disagree with the gentleman who was Secretary of Defense at the time?

You keep talking about troops being able to "get there in time." Was there a predetermined END time to this battle? I mean, did we KNOW when it was going to end and everyone sat around sayng "well, fuck...we can't get there in time, so why bother." It seems like that's what you're saying...and if you're NOT, then you're dumber than a box of rocks.

Edit: And another thing: Hildabeast is probably lucky that neither of those SEALS survived the battle. Because if either one had, there's a good chance they'd have put a bullet right between her eyes for her "response" to the battle.

[houndawg]

You laugh at this because of your military expertise, SD? Would you care to enlighten as to which troops were available and could have been there in time? And why you disagree with the gentleman who was Secretary of Defense at the time?

You keep talking about troops being able to "get there in time." Was there a predetermined END time to this battle? I mean, did we KNOW when it was going to end and everyone sat around sayng "well, ****...we can't get there in time, so why bother." It seems like that's what you're saying...and if you're NOT, then you're dumber than a box of rocks.

Edit: And another thing: Hildabeast is probably lucky that neither of those SEALS survived the battle. Because if either one had, there's a good chance they'd have put a bullet right between her eyes for her "response" to the battle.

I'm not offering an opinion, I'm repeating what the chain of command said. You can look it up yourself, but you already know.

Jeezus, it's fvcking baby seals all night here.

In fact, Ambassador Stevens refused two offers of increased security in the month before the attack. Maybe the SEALS killed him for that....

[D1B]

Perhaps you shouldn't rely on wikipedia for your replies.

Great response, Professor Poindexter.

Boilerplate conk response when confronted with facts.

89Cockrings

[AZGrizFan]

You keep talking about troops being able to "get there in time." Was there a predetermined END time to this battle? I mean, did we KNOW when it was going to end and everyone sat around sayng "well, ****...we can't get there in time, so why bother." It seems like that's what you're saying...and if you're NOT, then you're dumber than a box of rocks.

Edit: And another thing: Hildabeast is probably lucky that neither of those SEALS survived the battle. Because if either one had, there's a good chance they'd have put a bullet right between her eyes for her "response" to the battle.

I'm not offering an opinion, I'm repeating what the chain of command said. You can look it up yourself, but you already know.

Jeezus, it's fvcking baby seals all night here.

In fact, Ambassador Stevens refused two offers of increased security in the month before the attack. Maybe the SEALS killed him for that....

You and I both know the COC is just in CYA mode right now. Unless THEY knew when the battle was going to be over...

But DAMN, you do a good job of toeing the party line, 'dawg. Obama would be proud.