Big Sky Week 8 recap

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
MrTitleist
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 5932
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:02 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
Location: Missoula, MT

Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by MrTitleist »

http://www.egriz.com/2013/10/big-sky-week-8-recap/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Enjoy! Not much exciting last week, this coming week should provide a couple of good games.
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by dbackjon »

I like the way you assume that NAU and Poly are fighting for the 4th spot, assuming EWU, UM and MSU will finish 1-2-3

Montana/EWU/Montana State all have to play each other. So guaranteed 3 losses to spread around.

NAU has already played the Montana schools, with a split. Sac State only plays Montana (at home).

Entirely possible the winner of Cal Poly/NAU still wins the BSC, or at least finishes top 3. Sac State could be in there as well.
:thumb:
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

dbackjon wrote:I like the way you assume that NAU and Poly are fighting for the 4th spot, assuming EWU, UM and MSU will finish 1-2-3

Montana/EWU/Montana State all have to play each other. So guaranteed 3 losses to spread around.

NAU has already played the Montana schools, with a split. Sac State only plays Montana (at home).

Entirely possible the winner of Cal Poly/NAU still wins the BSC, or at least finishes top 3. Sac State could be in there as well.
Yeah, but you haven't factored in NAU's yearly collapse. ;)
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by dbackjon »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:I like the way you assume that NAU and Poly are fighting for the 4th spot, assuming EWU, UM and MSU will finish 1-2-3

Montana/EWU/Montana State all have to play each other. So guaranteed 3 losses to spread around.

NAU has already played the Montana schools, with a split. Sac State only plays Montana (at home).

Entirely possible the winner of Cal Poly/NAU still wins the BSC, or at least finishes top 3. Sac State could be in there as well.
Yeah, but you haven't factored in NAU's yearly collapse. ;)

We are working on demons. Last year, we had two tough games at the end of the season, still finished 8-3 and should have been in the playoffs.







Speaking of collapses:

SHSU
:thumb:
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

dbackjon wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Yeah, but you haven't factored in NAU's yearly collapse. ;)

We are working on demons. Last year, we had two tough games at the end of the season, still finished 8-3 and should have been in the playoffs.







Speaking of collapses:

AlphaGay's rectum
Truth. :ohno:
User avatar
MrTitleist
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 5932
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:02 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Big Sky Week 8 recap

Post by MrTitleist »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:I like the way you assume that NAU and Poly are fighting for the 4th spot, assuming EWU, UM and MSU will finish 1-2-3

Montana/EWU/Montana State all have to play each other. So guaranteed 3 losses to spread around.

NAU has already played the Montana schools, with a split. Sac State only plays Montana (at home).

Entirely possible the winner of Cal Poly/NAU still wins the BSC, or at least finishes top 3. Sac State could be in there as well.
Yeah, but you haven't factored in NAU's yearly collapse. ;)
That's what I was factoring in.
ImageImageImageImageImage
Post Reply