Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:48 am

He has what he considers a "better candidate:" Chelsea.

I wonder how Hillary takes that. There's no indication as yet that Chelsea is even interested, but I'm STILL concerned, however, that we'll get BOTH. SMH....

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-chel ... 33297.html

Post by **kalm** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:49 am

SuperHornet wrote:He has what he considers a "better candidate:" Chelsea.

I wonder how Hillary takes that. There's no indication as yet that Chelsea is even interested, but I'm STILL concerned, however, that we'll get BOTH. SMH....

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-chel ... 33297.html

Misogynist.

Post by **Ibanez** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:52 am

SuperHornet wrote:He has what he considers a "better candidate:" Chelsea.

I wonder how Hillary takes that. There's no indication as yet that Chelsea is even interested, but I'm STILL concerned, however, that we'll get BOTH. SMH....

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-chel ... 33297.html

Dude, it's 2013. Only a complete idiot would think Chelsea would run, she isn't even a political novice! She's Sarah Palin.

Post by **kalm** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:11 am

Ibanez wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:He has what he considers a "better candidate:" Chelsea.

I wonder how Hillary takes that. There's no indication as yet that Chelsea is even interested, but I'm STILL concerned, however, that we'll get BOTH. SMH....

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-chel ... 33297.html
Dude, it's 2013. Only a complete idiot would think Chelsea would run, she isn't even a political novice! She's Sarah Palin.

That's not fair...to Chelsea.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:13 am

Mother-Daughter combo???

Unfortunately, it is the wrong Mother and Daughter.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:04 pm

kalm wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:He has what he considers a "better candidate:" Chelsea.

I wonder how Hillary takes that. There's no indication as yet that Chelsea is even interested, but I'm STILL concerned, however, that we'll get BOTH. SMH....

http://news.yahoo.com/bill-clinton-chel ... 33297.html
Misogynist.

Um...no. As all the world knows, I'm voting for Sarah....

Post by **DSUrocks07** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 7:42 pm

SuperHornet wrote:
kalm wrote:
Misogynist.
Um...no. As all the world knows, I'm voting for Sarah....

"I'm not racist, I have a black friend."

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:47 pm

DSUrocks07 wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:
Um...no. As all the world knows, I'm voting for Sarah....
"I'm not racist, I have a black friend."

So, in order to be pro-female, I have to vote for the Democrat?

∞∞∞ · Post by **∞∞∞** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:21 am

Chelsea's definitely smart and well-spoken. She just needs a TON more political experience...

But then again, I'm sure we all know people without any political experience that we'd vote for over (the majority of?) current politicians. Hell, I'd wager most users here would make better ones.

Post by **DSUrocks07** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:43 am

SuperHornet wrote:
DSUrocks07 wrote:
"I'm not racist, I have a black friend."
So, in order to be pro-female, I have to vote for the Democrat?

GOD no!

Post by **kalm** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 6:53 am

SuperHornet wrote:
kalm wrote:
Misogynist.
Um...no. As all the world knows, I'm voting for Sarah....

What's she running for? Better yet...why? She's the village idiot, with a highly annoying Wisconsin-backwoods hybrid accent, but with a pretty face. That can be the only reason you would vote for her. Again...misogynist.

SARAH PALIN: Some day I'm actually going to tell America what I really think about GOP elephants that would actually turn on a senator who is fulfilling his campaign promise, the same promise that so many GOP candidates made and that was to defund and repeal and replace with something more sensible and economic, to repeal Obamacare. We finally have a tool to be able to take those steps to repeal and that's unfunding Obamacare and that's what Ted Cruz and Mike Lee and others want to do.

Now, these GOP elephants that would turn on someone whose trying to fight for the will of the people, for liberty and for economic justice, if you will, to have those turn on him, is extremely disappointing. It's not surprising, though. What is surprising, though, is my dad, who is a science teacher and natural history teacher. Dad, if you're watching this morning, if you're out of moose camp already and you're home, you are a teacher and you never told me that elephants were cannibalistic. I wish i would've known and then we would have a different tactic in the way that we do campaigns.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... _cruz.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post by **kalm** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:41 am

Maybe you meant to say Michelle:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/2 ... f=politics" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obamacare is literally going to kill the elderly, women, and children!

GrizFanStuckInUtah · Post by **GrizFanStuckInUtah** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:08 am

Do you know what Bill and Hillary used for birth control?

Spoiler: show: A picture of Chelsea on their headboard.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 7:59 pm

The "village idiot?" That's only true for the bogus libs, who try to define any female or minority Republican as a "whack job" so they can continue to paint themselves as the only true party of the minority. They have their own "village idiots," but refuse to admit it. Try Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Mikulski, Waters, etc....

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:26 pm

The mainstream Democrat Party leaders are the new plantation owners, and the CBC are their foremen.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Sep 29, 2013 8:35 am

SuperHornet wrote:The "village idiot?" That's only true for the bogus libs, who try to define any female or minority Republican as a "whack job" so they can continue to paint themselves as the only true party of the minority. They have their own "village idiots," but refuse to admit it. Try Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Mikulski, Waters, etc....

I can't stand Pelosi, Boxer, or Feinstein. Especially Boxer. She truly is a terrible person. Haven't payed much attention to Mikulski or Waters.

But Palin is an idiot. I don't mean from a political standpoint, she's really just not a smart human being at all. In fact, it's kind of cruel for the media to continuously parade her out in front of the cameras.

Post by **TheDancinMonarch** » Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:09 am

SuperHornet wrote:The "village idiot?" That's only true for the bogus libs, who try to define any female or minority Republican as a "whack job" so they can continue to paint themselves as the only true party of the minority. They have their own "village idiots," but refuse to admit it. Try Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Mikulski, Waters, etc....

Mikulski? What do you have against short, old people?

Post by **Ibanez** » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:51 pm

SuperHornet wrote:The "village idiot?" That's only true for the bogus libs, who try to define any female or minority Republican as a "whack job" so they can continue to paint themselves as the only true party of the minority. They have their own "village idiots," but refuse to admit it. Try Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Mikulski, Waters, etc....

Plain has nothing to offer. She has no experience. She is out dated and irrelevant. Only a Buffon would vote for her. Only a moron would believe she had a Snowballs chance in hell at winning anything other than a radio contest.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Sun Sep 29, 2013 6:31 pm

She has more executive experience than that failure Obama had when he was elected....

Post by **Ibanez** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:24 am

SuperHornet wrote:She has more executive experience than that failure Obama had when he was elected....

This isn't 2008. Our country would be more screwed up if her and McCain were elected. This is 2013. We're a few years away from the next cycle. She will be even more irrelevant then. What has she done to improve herself? Nothing. She's a talking head and a fan favorite, nothing more. She is not political material, AT ALL! She is noise. A distraction.

Post by **DSUrocks07** » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:31 am

SuperHornet wrote:She has more executive experience than that failure Obama had when he was elected....

And Obama now has more executive experience than she does and look how that turned out. Now we should support someone with LESS experience than Obama?

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."

Re: Bill says to "forget Hillary..."