Grizalltheway wrote:Yeah, see, you won't be able to do this in Washington and Colorado, any more than you can sell moonshine on the street in NC. I thought you understood the laws as written?
Please read my last post to Clenz.
Pot prices are expected to plummet once it's legalized and regulated. State run pot shops will be the cheapest place to buy the highest quality stuff.
Chizzang wrote:Here's the key point...
The world is waking up to the BIG MARIJUANA LIE that the tobacco industry launched years ago
10 more states are expected have legalization on the ballot over the next 8 years
It's coming... argue all you want about it / its still coming
I love when folks think only one side lies.
Where did I say that..?
Where did I even imply that..?
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
William Randolph Hearst funded Reefer Madness:
Creating public hysteria over smoking marijuana was simply a smokescreen for Hearst and the wealthy DuPont family to prevent the cultivation or importation of hemp products into the United States. The DuPont’s held many lucrative patents on chemicals used in manufacturing plastics, paper, and paints that could become valueless if hemp products and hemp oil derivatives became widely available. But how could they prevent this harmless weed from making their billion dollar patents worthless?
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
89Hen wrote:
Yeah, no implication there. I completely read into it.
Dude... this is now common knowledge / The sky is blue
Take a deep breath it's going to be okay
You guys really need to stay off the refer, it will rot your brain. Where did I say the tobacco lobby didn't lie? I said I laugh at the folks who think only one side lies.
Chizzang wrote:
Dude... this is now common knowledge / The sky is blue
Take a deep breath it's going to be okay
You guys really need to stay off the refer, it will rot your brain. Where did I say the tobacco lobby didn't lie? I said I laugh at the folks who think only one side lies.
Ya... and NOBODY even so much as implied that only one side of any debate lies
YOU are spinning in circles
and grasping
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Chizzang wrote:
Dude... this is now common knowledge / The sky is blue
Take a deep breath it's going to be okay
You guys really need to stay off the refer, it will rot your brain. Where did I say the tobacco lobby didn't lie? I said I laugh at the folks who think only one side lies.
Again, betraying your inability to clearly state your case.
89Hen wrote:
You guys really need to stay off the refer, it will rot your brain. Where did I say the tobacco lobby didn't lie? I said I laugh at the folks who think only one side lies.
Ya... and NOBODY even so much as implied that only one side of any debate lies
YOU are spinning in circles
and grasping
OK, so you are stating the studies published by the pro-MJ folks are lies. Good to know.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
With 89 that:
1) There are people who don't smoke pot because it is legal but will start if it becomes legal.
2) The statistics for pot-related deaths are understated because it is illegal and will rise as it becomes legal.
I think that as pot use increases, we will find that there are other health consequences because breathing in smoke from any burning substance on a regular basis is going to cause some problems. I also believe (opinion not fact) that pot is safer and healthier than alcohol and that the increased deaths will pale in comparison to alcohol related deaths.
I support legalization but let's not go into it thinking its some sort of panacea and that there won't be unintended consequences. Life isn't usually that simple.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Was it really 1936? They were way ahead of their time.
BTW, I have the black and white version at home, I will have to order the colorized version.
If you believe one word of that show you need a mental exam.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
UNI88 wrote:I agree with both sides in this debate.
With 89 that:
1) There are people who don't smoke pot because it is legal but will start if it becomes legal.
2) The statistics for pot-related deaths are understated because it is illegal and will rise as it becomes legal.
I think that as pot use increases, we will find that there are other health consequences because breathing in smoke from any burning substance on a regular basis is going to cause some problems. I also believe (opinion not fact) that pot is safer and healthier than alcohol and that the increased deaths will pale in comparison to alcohol related deaths.
I support legalization but let's not go into it thinking its some sort of panacea and that there won't be unintended consequences. Life isn't usually that simple.
Well said and I don't disagree with any of it, including that it may be safer. I haven't disputed that.
grizzaholic wrote:
If you believe one word of that show you need a mental exam.
Have you ever actually watched it and given it a chance?
OOPS..My bad. I have watched it and my previous statement was wrong. You might get the munchies.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."