houndawg wrote:Ibanez wrote:
Look at the case. Any case that lacks critical evidence, such as this one, is bound to be a win for the defense. Show me any video or witnesses that SAW Zimmerman as the one that was the aggressor. And don't say following, if following makes you an aggressor, than every cop and every person on the street is guilty.How many times do you have to be told that the jury reached the correct verdict based on the evidence? If the roles were reversed, however, you'd be the last to accept Martin's version of events without question the way you accept Zimm's version without question in spite of his changing story.
I love how you and dback and kleany know exactly what people you have never met are thinking at all times. Zimmerman knows this and that, Martin was thinking about this, not that, and how folks would feel if this or that happened.
You should have thrown in the towel long ago...with all of your digging, you must be halfway to China by now.
