Sandy Hook Conspiracy- Governor To Ban Any Access To Photos?

[expandspanos]

Sandy Hook Conspiracy - Governor Tries To Ban Any Access To Victims Photos - 911 Calls

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u78axPEq ... r_embedded[/youtube]

The MASSIVE SCAM has to be completely covered up- nobody has seen ANY proof at all, not one image of any blood, no bodies being removed from the school.. Now the entire law needs to be changed to "protect these families".. people if you don't know this is a hoax yet, there is no hope for you.

[expandspanos]

Just decided today- the Sandy Hook Cover-Up is complete with the law changed to keep the public in the dark.

http://blog.ctnews.com/dixon/2013/06/05 ... 5-minutes/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Senate, House approve Sandy Hook/FOIA

By Ken Dixon

HARTFORD – In a dramatic conclusion to days of negotiations and controversy over access to public records in the aftermath of the Newtown school massacre, lawmakers early this morning approved legislation to make all murder-scene video and photos private and to embargo the December 14 radio recordings of police describing the dead at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

As families of the Newtown victims looked on in the hushed Senate chamber, Senate President Pro Tempore Donald E. Williams Jr. and Senate Minority Leader John McKinney said the bill, brokered among lawmakers and Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s staff, is their best effort to balance the public’s right to know with the desire to protect the families from the release of graphic depictions of the 20 dead children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

The recording embargo does not include the 9-1-1 recordings of the December 14 murders, nor does it allow the Newtown town clerk to withhold death certificates as she has since the slaughter and which would have been allowed in an early draft of the bill.

The identities of minor child witnesses will be redacted from the final report of the crime, as well. The embargo on the police recordings will end on May 7 of next year.

The bill started in the Senate at 1:17 a.m. and was approved 33-2 17 minutes later. The House immediately took up the bill. Three House members who represent Newtown, Rep. DebraLee Hovey, Rep. Dan Carter and Rep. Mitch Bolinsky, spoke briefly and by 2 a.m., the legislation was approved, heading to the governor’s desk for his signature. The legislative session ends at midnight Wednesday.

“We have tried our best as Democrats and Republicans to work together to protect the interest of these families, these relatives sitting behind me, while honoring our tradition of being as free and open democracy,” said Williams, D-Brooklyn.

“The intent of what we’re doing here is very clear: that the public disclosure of an image of a brutally murdered child or spouse or sibling would cause emotional harm and violate the personal privacy of the parents and other surviving family members,” McKinney said.

“One does not need to see the photos to understand the unwarranted pain and anguish it would cause a parent or other family member to see such photos published and appear on the Internet every time someone searches ‘Sandy Hook’ or ‘school shooting,’ particularly in this case when we know who the perpetrator was and that he is deceased and where there is no legitimate claim of official misconduct there can be no public interest that would require the disclosure of such intensely painful pictures,” McKinney. “In this case it is our clear intent that the privacy interests of the victims and their families out weighs any public interest in the disclosure of the photos of the Sandy Hook victims. This is a narrow protection offered in this bill and it is not unusual or novel.”

The bill uses federal guidelines as the template for the suppression of the photographic evidence of the carnage.

The crux of the bill was one paragraph, sealing all murder photos: “Any record created by a law enforcement agency or other federal, state, or municipal governmental agency consisting of a photograph, film, video or digital or other visual image depicting the victim of a homicide, to the extent that such record could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of the victim or the victim’s surviving family members.”

In the House, Rep. Stephen Dargan, D-West Haven and Rep. Peter Tercyak, D-New Britain voted against the bill, which had 110 co-sponsors and was immediately transmitted to the governor for his signature.
............

Who needs the Freedom of Information Act anyway.. ? Time to change the law- Nobody saw proof of anything, no blood, no bodies, not one photo, none of the surveillance video.. But our gun rights are gone because of this event.. NOBODY ELSE IS PISSED ABOUT THIS?

[ASUG8]

Let me ask you something spandos.

When you see a fatal car crash on TV and they have a tarp over the vehicle or some shroud covering the scene while they recover bodies why do you think they do that? Because of a cover up? Maybe the smashed vehicle that has a license plate belonging to a vehicle belonging to an individual actually never happened? Do you think that every time a person offs themselves in a hotel room with a shotgun, skydives to their deaths off a building, is shot in their home by an intruder, etc. that the public should be privy to seeing that on the local news to "prove" to folks like you that it happened? If you saw the bodies of 20 individuals bloodied and mangled from sustaining repeated gunshots would you feel better that maybe it actually happened or would you and your ilk change your tack and say that they were staged bodies and it STILL never happened?

I think many of us have some level of morbid curiosity about events like this, but it's outweighed by respect for those who don't want to see a dead child riddled with bullet holes as well as respect for the families who had to and continue to endure the grieving process. If I had kids I don't think I'd want them watching the 6 o'clock news looking at what happens to bodies when they sustain graphic injuries, but maybe that's just me.

[Ibanez]

Let me ask you something spandos.

When you see a fatal car crash on TV and they have a tarp over the vehicle or some shroud covering the scene while they recover bodies why do you think they do that? Because of a cover up? Maybe the smashed vehicle that has a license plate belonging to a vehicle belonging to an individual actually never happened? Do you think that every time a person offs themselves in a hotel room with a shotgun, skydives to their deaths off a building, is shot in their home by an intruder, etc. that the public should be privy to seeing that on the local news to "prove" to folks like you that it happened? If you saw the bodies of 20 individuals bloodied and mangled from sustaining repeated gunshots would you feel better that maybe it actually happened or would you and your ilk change your tack and say that they were staged bodies and it STILL never happened?

I think many of us have some level of morbid curiosity about events like this, but it's outweighed by respect for those who don't want to see a dead child riddled with bullet holes as well as respect for the families who had to and continue to endure the grieving process. If I had kids I don't think I'd want them watching the 6 o'clock news looking at what happens to bodies when they sustain graphic injuries, but maybe that's just me.

That isn't just you. It's most people that use reasoning and respect in their decision making processes.

[expandspanos]

Let me ask you something spandos.

When you see a fatal car crash on TV and they have a tarp over the vehicle or some shroud covering the scene while they recover bodies why do you think they do that? Because of a cover up? Maybe the smashed vehicle that has a license plate belonging to a vehicle belonging to an individual actually never happened? Do you think that every time a person offs themselves in a hotel room with a shotgun, skydives to their deaths off a building, is shot in their home by an intruder, etc. that the public should be privy to seeing that on the local news to "prove" to folks like you that it happened? If you saw the bodies of 20 individuals bloodied and mangled from sustaining repeated gunshots would you feel better that maybe it actually happened or would you and your ilk change your tack and say that they were staged bodies and it STILL never happened?

I think many of us have some level of morbid curiosity about events like this, but it's outweighed by respect for those who don't want to see a dead child riddled with bullet holes as well as respect for the families who had to and continue to endure the grieving process. If I had kids I don't think I'd want them watching the 6 o'clock news looking at what happens to bodies when they sustain graphic injuries, but maybe that's just me.

Are those car crashes being used as an excuse to remove the 2nd Amendment? No.. that is totally different.

This event is being used as an excuse for gun control- the majority of the people involved in this MASSIVE SCAM are failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Even in the helicopter view of the "crime scene" NOT ONE BODY WAS EVER SHOWN, NO BLOOD, NO BLOODY FOOTPRINTS.

This event has now changed all future FOIA requests- there is no FOIA because of this event..

No more 2nd Amendment, no more FOIA over this total fake event.

[expandspanos]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R8QV1Eo ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

[ASUG8]

Let me ask you something spandos.

When you see a fatal car crash on TV and they have a tarp over the vehicle or some shroud covering the scene while they recover bodies why do you think they do that? Because of a cover up? Maybe the smashed vehicle that has a license plate belonging to a vehicle belonging to an individual actually never happened? Do you think that every time a person offs themselves in a hotel room with a shotgun, skydives to their deaths off a building, is shot in their home by an intruder, etc. that the public should be privy to seeing that on the local news to "prove" to folks like you that it happened? If you saw the bodies of 20 individuals bloodied and mangled from sustaining repeated gunshots would you feel better that maybe it actually happened or would you and your ilk change your tack and say that they were staged bodies and it STILL never happened?

I think many of us have some level of morbid curiosity about events like this, but it's outweighed by respect for those who don't want to see a dead child riddled with bullet holes as well as respect for the families who had to and continue to endure the grieving process. If I had kids I don't think I'd want them watching the 6 o'clock news looking at what happens to bodies when they sustain graphic injuries, but maybe that's just me.

Are those car crashes being used as an excuse to remove the 2nd Amendment? No.. that is totally different.

This event is being used as an excuse for gun control- the majority of the people involved in this MASSIVE SCAM are failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Even in the helicopter view of the "crime scene" NOT ONE BODY WAS EVER SHOWN, NO BLOOD, NO BLOODY FOOTPRINTS.

This event has now changed all future FOIA requests- there is no FOIA because of this event..

No more 2nd Amendment, no more FOIA over this total fake event.

There was blood, bloody people, etc. in Boston but that was fake too, no?

[Ibanez]

Let me ask you something spandos.

When you see a fatal car crash on TV and they have a tarp over the vehicle or some shroud covering the scene while they recover bodies why do you think they do that? Because of a cover up? Maybe the smashed vehicle that has a license plate belonging to a vehicle belonging to an individual actually never happened? Do you think that every time a person offs themselves in a hotel room with a shotgun, skydives to their deaths off a building, is shot in their home by an intruder, etc. that the public should be privy to seeing that on the local news to "prove" to folks like you that it happened? If you saw the bodies of 20 individuals bloodied and mangled from sustaining repeated gunshots would you feel better that maybe it actually happened or would you and your ilk change your tack and say that they were staged bodies and it STILL never happened?

I think many of us have some level of morbid curiosity about events like this, but it's outweighed by respect for those who don't want to see a dead child riddled with bullet holes as well as respect for the families who had to and continue to endure the grieving process. If I had kids I don't think I'd want them watching the 6 o'clock news looking at what happens to bodies when they sustain graphic injuries, but maybe that's just me.

Are those car crashes being used as an excuse to remove the 2nd Amendment? No.. that is totally different.

This event is being used as an excuse for gun control- the majority of the people involved in this MASSIVE SCAM are failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Even in the helicopter view of the "crime scene" NOT ONE BODY WAS EVER SHOWN, NO BLOOD, NO BLOODY FOOTPRINTS.

This event has now changed all future FOIA requests- there is no FOIA because of this event..

No more 2nd Amendment, no more FOIA over this total fake event.

Being that the crime scene was indoors, i'm not surprised that a helicopter didn't get any images.

[ASUG8]

Are those car crashes being used as an excuse to remove the 2nd Amendment? No.. that is totally different.

This event is being used as an excuse for gun control- the majority of the people involved in this MASSIVE SCAM are failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Even in the helicopter view of the "crime scene" NOT ONE BODY WAS EVER SHOWN, NO BLOOD, NO BLOODY FOOTPRINTS.

This event has now changed all future FOIA requests- there is no FOIA because of this event..

No more 2nd Amendment, no more FOIA over this total fake event.

Being that the crime scene was indoors, i'm not surprised that a helicopter didn't get any images.

You're missing the point. The first responders were supposed to parade each dead child and teacher out in front of the media in the name of freedom of the press as they were recovered despite the families not having the opportunity to identify them yet. Inquiring minds want to know, dontchaknow?

[expandspanos]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZisaOWH ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

[ASUG8]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZisaOWH ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

I hear a lot of beeping with some unidentified subtitled text thrown in I'm assuming from someone in a helicopter. Any chance that this was filmed before they moved bodies out? What does this prove?

[andy7171]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZisaOWH ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

Just wondering, what makes you think that is the actual pilots voice? We've all seen the images of the LIVE children running out and getting sheltered away in the Fire Department. If the rest of the 20 children and 6 teachers are dead. Who is the helicopter(s) going to film leaving for the rest of the day? No doubt there were multiple helicopters circling the vicinity for days.

[expandspanos]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZisaOWH ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

I hear a lot of beeping with some unidentified subtitled text thrown in I'm assuming from someone in a helicopter. Any chance that this was filmed before they moved bodies out? What does this prove?

Are we playing stupid here?

There are zero images from a helicopter, news source, anything of any bloody bodies being taken out of the school- anyone being placed on the "staging tarps"..

Have you seen the images and video from Columbine? There are VOLUMES of video and photos that were released almost as soon as the event happened that that was a legitimate crime scene! Kids falling out of windows, blood everywhere, people being rushed into ambulances, blood on the ground, security camera footage of what happened, photo evidence.

Sandy Hook: Nothing.

Sandy Hook: Security cameras? Yes they were there.. Check (not shown to public) Helicopter with perfect vantage point: Check People with cameras on the scene? Check People with video cameras: Check

Any proof of anything? No. 2nd Amendment changed forever? Yes. Freedom of Information Act Changed forever: Yes.

Most of the Sandy Hook Parents FailedActors/Musicians? Yes.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIXc8VW0 ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

[ASUG8]

Spandos - your belief is that Sandy Hook was contrived by our government to begin an assault on gun owners and the Second Amendment? Let's see how that worked out....

* Obama began talking about additional background checks, magazine restrictions, etc.
* People freaked out
* People began stockpiling handguns, scary guns, and ammunition leading to shortages
* Gun shops began conducting CWP classes at a dramatically increased rate
* The US is arguably much more armed per capita six months post Newtown
* Despite a few states tightening their already strict laws (Conn, NJ, NY, CO) in the wake of the shootings, a number of states have loosened theirs

If this was government orchestrated, what was their endgame?

[Ibanez]

I hear a lot of beeping with some unidentified subtitled text thrown in I'm assuming from someone in a helicopter. Any chance that this was filmed before they moved bodies out? What does this prove?

Are we playing stupid here?

There are zero images from a helicopter, news source, anything of any bloody bodies being taken out of the school- anyone being placed on the "staging tarps"..

Have you seen the images and video from Columbine? There are VOLUMES of video and photos that were released almost as soon as the event happened that that was a legitimate crime scene! Kids falling out of windows, blood everywhere, people being rushed into ambulances, blood on the ground, security camera footage of what happened, photo evidence.

Sandy Hook: Nothing.

Sandy Hook: Security cameras? Yes they were there.. Check (not shown to public) Helicopter with perfect vantage point: Check People with cameras on the scene? Check People with video cameras: Check

Any proof of anything? No. 2nd Amendment changed forever? Yes. Freedom of Information Act Changed forever: Yes.

Most of the Sandy Hook Parents FailedActors/Musicians? Yes.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIXc8VW0 ... e=youtu.be[/youtube]

We don't have images of bloody bodies being taken out of Afghanistan, are all those deaths falsified as well? You have zero proof of your claims.

[ASUG8]

Are we playing stupid here?

Yes, someone is.

[expandspanos]

We don't have images of bloody bodies being taken out of Afghanistan, are all those deaths falsified as well? You have zero proof of your claims.

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

[Ibanez]

We don't have images of bloody bodies being taken out of Afghanistan, are all those deaths falsified as well? You have zero proof of your claims.

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

Straw man argument? It's the same fucking thing. You can say all the coffins coming in at Dover are empty and it's just massive ploy to keep the conspiracy alive.

You have zero proof that Sandy Hook is a government conspiracy.

[andy7171]

We don't have images of bloody bodies being taken out of Afghanistan, are all those deaths falsified as well? You have zero proof of your claims.

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

What about the entire classroom of children that are no longer around? What about the teachers? And their families?

[ASUG8]

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

What about the entire classroom of children that are no longer around? What about the teachers? And their families?

I asked exactly the same question when he started the whole 9/11 theory to no avail. Planes full of missing people, but they were actors or just made up. Missiles and photoshop I guess.

[Ibanez]

We don't have images of bloody bodies being taken out of Afghanistan, are all those deaths falsified as well? You have zero proof of your claims.

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

We don't have photo's of the Waxhaw massacre. Was that a conspiracy?

[HI54UNI]

Are we playing stupid here?

There's no "we" playing stupid. It's just you.

[ASUG8]

Are we playing stupid here?

There's no "we" playing stupid. It's just you.

About time you showed up.

[Ibanez]

Nice straw-man argument there..

You have zero proof Sandy Hook happened... except for of course the very poorly acted testimony of a bunch of failed/aspiring actors and musicians.

Who needs proof anyway.. let's just get rid of the 2nd Amendment..

While we're at it- lets make sure any sketchy event in the future can be properly covered up by making sure the public never sees photos of videos of anything.

What about the entire classroom of children that are no longer around? What about the teachers? And their families?

They are with JFK, Elvis, Kurt Cobain, Daniel Pearl, Caylee Anthony, Tupac and Biggie in Switzerland. You know, just chillin.

[Ibanez]

What about the entire classroom of children that are no longer around? What about the teachers? And their families?

I asked exactly the same question when he started the whole 9/11 theory to no avail. Planes full of missing people, but they were actors or just made up. Missiles and photoshop I guess.

It's all a big illusion. Fuckin Chris Angel.