Ka-Ching!

Political discussions
Post Reply
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69186
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Ka-Ching!

Post by kalm »

It looks like Obama, the union and bottom 47% loving and class warfare fighting socialist is at it again. He's clearly anti-business! :lol:
It is deeply revealing that in the midst of the continuing cycle of misery brought on by the chicanery of the financial community two key Cabinet positions dealing with business practices will likely be occupied by people who specialized in those financial rip-offs.

For Pritzker, as with the confirmation of Lew, the fix is in. The Republicans don't dare push back too hard on shady business practices that their deregulation legislation endorsed, and Democrats will go along with anything the president wants.

The same restraint will be exhibited in exploring the offshore tax havens that have protected the Pritzker family's immense wealth. Back in 2008, when she had been rumored for this same Cabinet post, Pritzker was queried about avoiding the sort of taxes most ordinary folks are obligated to pay, and she replied in writing: "I am a beneficiary of some non-U.S. situs trusts which were established about 50 years ago (when I was a child) and are administered by a non-U.S.-based financial institution as trustee. I do not control how those assets are administered." If the Republicans challenge that canard, the Democrats will smugly remind them of Mitt Romney's tax havens, as if that excuses tax avoidance within their own ranks.

Certainly the Republicans will not raise questions about the anti-union practices that helped create the Hyatt fortune in the first place and continue to this day. Nor will the Democrats, who embrace unions only at national convention time.

"There is a huge unresolved set of issues in the Democratic Party between people of wealth and people who work," noted Andy Stern, former president of the Service Employees International Union, which attempts to organize the miserably paid workers that produced Pritzker's wealth. "Penny is a living example of that issue."

But it's payback time, and even normally progressive Democrats like Pritzker's home state Sen. Dick Durbin are prepared to roll over. Treating the appointment of billionaire Pritzker as a victory for women everywhere, the senator said she'd "broken through the glass ceiling with her extraordinary intelligence and business acumen."

Right, Pritzker will be a fine role model for those women working at the Asian factories that she'll be touring as Commerce secretary extolling the virtues of the American business model.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-sc ... f=politics" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
Image
Image
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by CAA Flagship »

kalm, you spelled it wrong. :ohno: :ohno:

It's.....

Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:It looks like Obama, the union and bottom 47% loving and class warfare fighting socialist is at it again. He's clearly anti-business! :lol:
It is deeply revealing that in the midst of the continuing cycle of misery brought on by the chicanery of the financial community two key Cabinet positions dealing with business practices will likely be occupied by people who specialized in those financial rip-offs.

For Pritzker, as with the confirmation of Lew, the fix is in. The Republicans don't dare push back too hard on shady business practices that their deregulation legislation endorsed, and Democrats will go along with anything the president wants.

The same restraint will be exhibited in exploring the offshore tax havens that have protected the Pritzker family's immense wealth. Back in 2008, when she had been rumored for this same Cabinet post, Pritzker was queried about avoiding the sort of taxes most ordinary folks are obligated to pay, and she replied in writing: "I am a beneficiary of some non-U.S. situs trusts which were established about 50 years ago (when I was a child) and are administered by a non-U.S.-based financial institution as trustee. I do not control how those assets are administered." If the Republicans challenge that canard, the Democrats will smugly remind them of Mitt Romney's tax havens, as if that excuses tax avoidance within their own ranks.

Certainly the Republicans will not raise questions about the anti-union practices that helped create the Hyatt fortune in the first place and continue to this day. Nor will the Democrats, who embrace unions only at national convention time.

"There is a huge unresolved set of issues in the Democratic Party between people of wealth and people who work," noted Andy Stern, former president of the Service Employees International Union, which attempts to organize the miserably paid workers that produced Pritzker's wealth. "Penny is a living example of that issue."

But it's payback time, and even normally progressive Democrats like Pritzker's home state Sen. Dick Durbin are prepared to roll over. Treating the appointment of billionaire Pritzker as a victory for women everywhere, the senator said she'd "broken through the glass ceiling with her extraordinary intelligence and business acumen."

Right, Pritzker will be a fine role model for those women working at the Asian factories that she'll be touring as Commerce secretary extolling the virtues of the American business model.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-sc ... f=politics" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:rofl:

It's a good day in 'merica when the "progressive" hoi polloi and the "progressive" elite are whining and bitchin' and pointing fingers at each other. :thumb:
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote:normally progressive Democrats like... Sen. Dick Durbin...
This was the real gem in the whole piece. I love when folks use "progressive" to mean ultra-Liberal and then use it later to mean moderate. :?

Kalm, I am curious why you only bolded the nasty parts about Reps when there were equally nasty parts about Dems.
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30613
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by UNI88 »

Kalmy, should Obama appoint a bunch of people who are pro-union, pro-worker, anti-business? Especially to a post that is expected to represent and help business? If you want a truly effective cabinet shouldn't you appoint people with different perspectives and experience? I know that as a leader, I don't want a bunch of "yes men" or people who agree on everything of substance. I want different opinions and disagreements.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by Pwns »

Well, she'll be one cabinet member who legally avoids taxes.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by AZGrizFan »

89Hen wrote:
kalm wrote:normally progressive Democrats like... Sen. Dick Durbin...
This was the real gem in the whole piece. I love when folks use "progressive" to mean ultra-Liberal and then use it later to mean moderate. :?

Kalm, I am curious why you only bolded the nasty parts about Reps when there were equally nasty parts about Dems.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

First thing I noticed as well. :ohno:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69186
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by kalm »

UNI88 wrote:Kalmy, should Obama appoint a bunch of people who are pro-union, pro-worker, anti-business?
No, not neccessarily. And that's my point and (for 89) why I singled out the Republican parts of the article. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by Ivytalk »

UNI88 wrote:Kalmy, should Obama appoint a bunch of people who are pro-union, pro-worker, anti-business? Especially to a post that is expected to represent and help business? If you want a truly effective cabinet shouldn't you appoint people with different perspectives and experience? I know that as a leader, I don't want a bunch of "yes men" or people who agree on everything of substance. I want different opinions and disagreements.

Liar!! :rofl:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30613
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by UNI88 »

Ivytalk wrote:
UNI88 wrote:Kalmy, should Obama appoint a bunch of people who are pro-union, pro-worker, anti-business? Especially to a post that is expected to represent and help business? If you want a truly effective cabinet shouldn't you appoint people with different perspectives and experience? I know that as a leader, I don't want a bunch of "yes men" or people who agree on everything of substance. I want different opinions and disagreements.
Liar!! :rofl:
Shut up. If I wanted a differing opinion especially yours I would have asked for it and paid your billable rate. ;)
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by Ivytalk »

UNI88 wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:
Liar!! :rofl:
Shut up. If I wanted a differing opinion especially yours I would have asked for it and paid your billable rate. ;)
That comment was pro bono! :mrgreen:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by JohnStOnge »

I think there is a paradox with Obama. I think he really does want a communist world. I really do. But at the same time I think he's a pure politician. I don't think there is an honest bone in his body either. I think he is a total political animal.

Lots of politicians on both sides who are in that category to be sure. But I don't think there's any doubt that he's one of them.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69186
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by kalm »

JohnStOnge wrote:I think there is a paradox with Obama. I think he really does want a communist world. I really do. But at the same time I think he's a pure politician. I don't think there is an honest bone in his body either. I think he is a total political animal.

Lots of politicians on both sides who are in that category to be sure. But I don't think there's any doubt that he's one of them.
He is pure political animal to be sure. And a center right, corporatist one at that. :nod:

I realize this notion poses a real problem for some. :lol:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by CID1990 »

kalm wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:I think there is a paradox with Obama. I think he really does want a communist world. I really do. But at the same time I think he's a pure politician. I don't think there is an honest bone in his body either. I think he is a total political animal.

Lots of politicians on both sides who are in that category to be sure. But I don't think there's any doubt that he's one of them.
He is pure political animal to be sure. And a center right, corporatist one at that. :nod:

I realize this notion poses a real problem for some. :lol:
Calling Obama a corporatist is accurate but center right is quite a stretch.


Sent from the center of the universe.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69186
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by kalm »

CID1990 wrote:
kalm wrote:
He is pure political animal to be sure. And a center right, corporatist one at that. :nod:

I realize this notion poses a real problem for some. :lol:
Calling Obama a corporatist is accurate but center right is quite a stretch.


Sent from the center of the universe.

Lets see here...proposed cuts to SS, escalated the war in Afghanistan and use of drones, protects TBTF banks, increased deportation of illegal immigrants, maintained the status quo for the War on Drugs...

You could claim Obamacare but it's pretty much the same as Romneycare (and corporatist driven), you could claim gun control but he's pretty much side by side with Bloomberg, you could claim tax increases but so did GHWB and, like Reagan, Obama also raised them on the middle class.

I'm not saying Romney, Bloomberg, GHWB, and Reagan are examples of staunch conservatives or that they and Obama don't have a left side, but...
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm (and other interested parties): I recommend that you read Brown professor Mark Blyth's article, "The Austerity Delusion," in the May-June issue of Foreign Affairs. It's a thought-provoking read, although I'm not sure I agree with it. :twocents:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Ka-Ching!

Post by houndawg »

JohnStOnge wrote:I think there is a paradox with Obama. I think he really does want a communist world. I really do. But at the same time I think he's a pure politician. I don't think there is an honest bone in his body either. I think he is a total political animal.

Lots of politicians on both sides who are in that category to be sure. But I don't think there's any doubt that he's one of them.
Ya think?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Post Reply