[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEZ15m-D_n8[/youtube]

People in North Carolina fighting to get the toxic waste drug Fluoride taken out of their water supply:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZabGVxv96qI[/youtube]






Naughty boy.dihydrogen monoxide





I'm not a jackass- I know Dihydrogen Monoxide is a fancy word for water.JohnStOnge wrote:Naughty boy.dihydrogen monoxide

I'm beginning to think lack of fluoride causes paranoia.expandspanos wrote:Very funny video.
It's always fun to laugh when we feel that we might be in danger isn't it?
The DHSS in the UK have admitted that in the fluoridated areas of the UK, 48% of the population have dental fluorosis
Honestly- I am not worried about this personally (except that I bathe in it) I have a water filter, and brush with Fluoride-free toothpaste.. I am posting this because you, or your kids might be affected, and I think it is worth pointing out for the health of you and your family.

And does your fluoride free toothpaste have any cautions on the label?and brush with Fluoride-free toothpaste


Read the warning label on your toothpaste bud..JohnStOnge wrote:BTW, anybody who thinks the FDA knowingly allows compounds known to be hazardous in products like toothpaste is smoking rope.

Actually, no, it doesn't.JohnStOnge wrote:And does your fluoride free toothpaste have any cautions on the label?and brush with Fluoride-free toothpaste

That dihydrogen stuff is nasty shit. Especially in Phoenix.BlueHen86 wrote:Fluoride is the least of our worries, it's the dihydrogen monoxide component of brushing your teeth that you have to worry about. Dihydrogen monoxide can be found in large quantities and Nuclear Power Plants, the Navy does experiments with it, it is a primary component of acid rain, it causes soil erosion and is also considered to be a greenhouse gas.


You actually have a good point there- However by "paranoia" you mean a working brain.BlueHen86 wrote:I'm beginning to think lack of fluoride causes paranoia.expandspanos wrote:Very funny video.
It's always fun to laugh when we feel that we might be in danger isn't it?
The DHSS in the UK have admitted that in the fluoridated areas of the UK, 48% of the population have dental fluorosis
Honestly- I am not worried about this personally (except that I bathe in it) I have a water filter, and brush with Fluoride-free toothpaste.. I am posting this because you, or your kids might be affected, and I think it is worth pointing out for the health of you and your family.

Actually, no, it doesn't.


Yeah, take the poison out of the toothpaste, and there is no need for a warning label- it's really that simple.JohnStOnge wrote:Actually, no, it doesn't.
Really, nothing? What brand is that? It' would be very unusual for ANY product nowadays not to have some cautions/warnings.



I'll check each one of them out individually and get back to you in a week.HI54UNI wrote:I hope these women are OK after getting flouridated water on them.






BlueHen86 wrote:Fluoride is the least of our worries, it's the dihydrogen monoxide component of brushing your teeth that you have to worry about. Dihydrogen monoxide can be found in large quantities and Nuclear Power Plants, the Navy does experiments with it, it is a primary component of acid rain, it causes soil erosion and is also considered to be a greenhouse gas.
expandspanos wrote:Yeah, take the poison out of the toothpaste, and there is no need for a warning label- it's really that simple.JohnStOnge wrote:
Really, nothing? What brand is that? It' would be very unusual for ANY product nowadays not to have some cautions/warnings.
http://www.drugstore.com/toms-of-maine- ... blTabStrip" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;[

http://www.ada.org/1761.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Read the warning label on your toothpaste bud..
There is also a label on cancer-causing cigarettes warning people that they are at risk. Same difference.
Why would there be a warning label on Toothpaste, if in fact there were no risk? That doesn't make much sense does it now?
The ADA position is that the FDA went way over the top by requiring that language on toothpaste:


Ok. I use Close Up toothpaste. I buy the 8 ounce tube. It's 0.24% sodium fluoride. That means if I ate an entire tube of the toothpaste I use I would ingest 0.54 grams of sodium fluoride. That is about one-ninth of the lower range of the lethal dose you reference. And, again, that is if I for some reason decided to eat an entire tube of toothpaste. I don't think anything close to that is going to happen."The lethal dose for a 70 kg (154 lb) human is estimated at 5–10 g.[7] Sodium fluoride is classed as toxic by both inhalation (of dusts or aerosols) and ingestion.[13]"
