Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak credit

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

LeadBolt wrote:
kalm wrote:
When you post a statement without further explanation, what do you expect? All I can say is I'm glad I'm not a democrat and i think you're projecting. :thumb:
Not at all.
OK...fine. I also apologize to you for calling you a milquetoast conk. If that's why you think I'm a tool than please accept my apology. If not...please explain why you think I'm a tool based on my thoughts regarding the thread.

(Geez...you guys better appreciate that I'm a guilt ridden SOB willing to acknowledge my faults...unlike those assholes Cluck and AZ...whateverhisnameis :mrgreen: )
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
LeadBolt
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3586
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Botetourt

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by LeadBolt »

kalm wrote:
LeadBolt wrote:
Not at all.
OK...fine. I also apologize to you for calling you a milquetoast conk. If that's why you think I'm a tool than please accept my apology. If not...please explain why you think I'm a tool based on my thoughts regarding the thread.

(Geez...you guys better appreciate that I'm a guilt ridden SOB willing to acknowledge my faults...unlike those assholes Cluck and AZ...whateverhisnameis :mrgreen: )
Apology accepted.

I feel the way I do because you always seem to add something uncalled for such as I have highlighted above putting people you don't agree with down. As has been said, you are better than that.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

LeadBolt wrote:
kalm wrote:
OK...fine. I also apologize to you for calling you a milquetoast conk. If that's why you think I'm a tool than please accept my apology. If not...please explain why you think I'm a tool based on my thoughts regarding the thread.

(Geez...you guys better appreciate that I'm a guilt ridden SOB willing to acknowledge my faults...unlike those assholes Cluck and AZ...whateverhisnameis :mrgreen: )
Apology accepted.

I feel the way I do because you always seem to add something uncalled for such as I have highlighted above putting people you don't agree with down. As has been said, you are better than that.
:lol:

OK, in case I've hurt Cluck and Z, I apologize to them too.

* FTR, assholes are some of my favorite people - as long as they know they're assholes. It's only the assholes who don't realize they're assholes that I have issues with. I've never met Cluck and Z in person so I assume they aren't really assholes because I tend to actually like and try to see the good in pretty much everybody. So in this instance, asshole wasn't intended as an insult but a joking term of endearment.

** FTR, I did use a :mrgreen:

*** I've so far apologized to Gannon, LB, Cluck, and Z in this thread. Is there anyone else?

(Geez, humility is tough work)
:ohno:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
LeadBolt
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3586
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Botetourt

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by LeadBolt »

It is so much easier to be an azzhole on an anonymous chat board, it brings out that in all of us. There is something Biblical about us all being azzholes, (Rom. 3:23), it part of the human condition.

While we seldom agree, you usually make good arguments for your points of view, however misguided they are...

Yes ,I do know those comments indicate I'm an azzhole, so I guess now I'm one of your favorite people...

:lol: :clap: :rofl: :o
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
LeadBolt wrote:
Apology accepted.

I feel the way I do because you always seem to add something uncalled for such as I have highlighted above putting people you don't agree with down. As has been said, you are better than that.
:lol:

OK, in case I've hurt Cluck and Z, I apologize to them too.

* FTR, assholes are some of my favorite people - as long as they know they're assholes. It's only the assholes who don't realize they're assholes that I have issues with. I've never met Cluck and Z in person so I assume they aren't really assholes because I tend to actually like and try to see the good in pretty much everybody. So in this instance, asshole wasn't intended as an insult but a joking term of endearment.

** FTR, I did use a :mrgreen:

*** I've so far apologized to Gannon, LB, Cluck, and Z in this thread. Is there anyone else?

(Geez, humility is tough work)
:ohno:
GFY, fucker*.







* Ask Mountaineer about that. :kisswink:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

LeadBolt wrote:It is so much easier to be an azzhole on an anonymous chat board, it brings out that in all of us. There is something Biblical about us all being azzholes, (Rom. 3:23), it part of the human condition.

While we seldom agree, you usually make good arguments for your points of view, however misguided they are...

Yes ,I do know those comments indicate I'm an azzhole, so I guess now I'm one of your favorite people...

:lol: :clap: :rofl: :o
Shut up asshole. :kisswink:

Now...back to the task at hand. Obama to (big) banks: make home loans to people with weak credit...but don't worry, we got your back (and by we, I mean the taxpayers via my administration's TBTF and too big to prosecute policies):
Lately, economists have tried to pin down exactly how much the subsidy lowers big banks’ borrowing costs. In one relatively thorough effort, two researchers -- Kenichi Ueda of the International Monetary Fund and Beatrice Weder di Mauro of the University of Mainz -- put the number at about 0.8 percentage point. The discount applies to all their liabilities, including bonds and customer deposits.

Big Difference
Small as it might sound, 0.8 percentage point makes a big difference. Multiplied by the total liabilities of the 10 largest U.S. banks by assets, it amounts to a taxpayer subsidy of $83 billion a year. To put the figure in perspective, it’s tantamount to the government giving the banks about 3 cents of every tax dollar collected.

The top five banks -- JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. - - account for $64 billion of the total subsidy, an amount roughly equal to their typical annual profits (see tables for data on individual banks). In other words, the banks occupying the commanding heights of the U.S. financial industry -- with almost $9 trillion in assets, more than half the size of the U.S. economy -- would just about break even in the absence of corporate welfare. In large part, the profits they report are essentially transfers from taxpayers to their shareholders.

Neither bank executives nor shareholders have much incentive to change the situation. On the contrary, the financial industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars every election cycle on campaign donations and lobbying, much of which is aimed at maintaining the subsidy. The result is a bloated financial sector and recurring credit gluts. Left unchecked, the superbanks could ultimately require bailouts that exceed the government’s resources. Picture a meltdown in which the Treasury is helpless to step in as it did in 2008 and 2009.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-2 ... year-.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Like I said... :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote: OK...fine. I also apologize to you for calling you a milquetoast conk. If that's why you think I'm a tool than please accept my apology. If not...please explain why you think I'm a tool based on my thoughts regarding the thread.

(Geez...you guys better appreciate that I'm a guilt ridden SOB willing to acknowledge my faults...unlike those assholes Cluck and AZ...whateverhisnameis :mrgreen: )
What's a "fault?" :suspicious:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote: OK...fine. I also apologize to you for calling you a milquetoast conk. If that's why you think I'm a tool than please accept my apology. If not...please explain why you think I'm a tool based on my thoughts regarding the thread.

(Geez...you guys better appreciate that I'm a guilt ridden SOB willing to acknowledge my faults...unlike those assholes Cluck and AZ...whateverhisnameis :mrgreen: )
What's a "fault?" :suspicious:
I'd never heard that word either. :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
What's a "fault?" :suspicious:
I'd never heard that word either. :coffee:
Exactly! :lol:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
LeadBolt
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3586
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Botetourt

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by LeadBolt »

The underlying cause of the financial collapse of 2008 was greed, coupled with relaxing of regulations and oversight meant to keep the financial system solvent.

I still don't like the government telling lending institutions to lower credit requirements because the government "has their back". I believe Obama, and other elected officials should cease and desist from such behavior.

I'm not sure what form the subsidy mentioned above takes. I am heavily invested in a small local bank that is profitable and has taken no bailout funds. One thing I do see from that perspective is a more than 30 times rise in their FDIC rates since 2007, although they have never filed a claim.

This small, conservatively run bank ($150MM) is in fact subsidizing the large banks that the government is pressuring to make risky loans through the rates charged by the FDIC system. The small, well run financial institutions of this country cannot continue to fund the too big to fail ones whom the government constantly bangs on to make risky loans.

We the people fund these bailouts. The role of the government should be to protect us from untoward greed thru prudent regulations and oversight, not to encourage risky behavior in a back door attempt to transfer wealth through encouraging sub-prime loans and failure to prudently regulate financial institutions.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm,

You continue to blame the banks, Wall Street, and any other leviathan out there.

The fact is that everybody had a hand in the meltdown. EVERYONE.

It comes down to simple greed...and there are very few, with the exception of maybe Frodo...that do not have their own best interest in mind. Blaming things mostly on the banks is just foolish.

I'll recant a story I think I put on here a while back, but it is very relevant.

I sat in a room with only a handful of people, including one of the very top Bank of America executives (let's leave it at single digits..I don't want to get sued). We were deciding what to do with personnel regarding a few mergers (I was only concerned about my small areas, but my boss was absent so I was in there representing her as well). We really were not talking about cuts...we were talking about shuffling/reassigning responsibilities, reworking existing physical assets (buildings, phones, etc.), and in a lot of cases, simply renaming the existing positions (with a little training needed to bring the acquired folks up to speed). We needed people, so very, very few people would be let go...especially during the transition period.

This guy starts laughing...and I mean almost pissing his pants. They had decided that they were going to spread word about laying people off and shutting down facilities in a couple states in order to get money to do our renovations. They leaked that "layoff" story to the press and politicians, and sure enough, everyone started panicking. Offers of tens of millions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives started pouring in from each state if BOA would say they were saving a certain number of jobs for a certain amount of time.

WE WERE NOT GOING TO LAY THOSE PEOPLE OFF! In fact, we were very concerned about maintaining service and had plans to hire MORE people. But, instead of the bank paying for the retraining, systems integration, and facility upgrades (and we had plans to do just that), it was, instead, the TAXPAYERS in those states who paid for it.

I had to laugh when I saw our local paper naming the jobs that would be saved and in what facilities...and the cost to the state to "keep" them there. The same thing happened in the other states...big announcements from their state politicians about what a great job they did negotiating with the bank. :rofl: :rofl:

Every time I see the faces of the politicians involved, and I see them several times each year at small functions, I think about what suckers they were. They really have no idea of what they did and what they were up against. And, of course, the employees were in a panic, as were local businesses that were partially supported by those employees. News articles had them stating that our Governor and other representatives HAD to do something to save the economy. Use taxpayer money…just don’t allow my lunch patrons or retail operation to suffer.

in the end, EVERYONE was willing to have someone else (other taxpayers) pay in order to keep their little portion of the American dream going. It’s the American way…a culture drummed into everyone’s head.

And it wasn’t just in America…real estate bubbles and other forms of greed were happening all over as ordinary people tried to get in on the gold rush. Workers didn’t accept anything but large yearly increases in both salary and pension benefits. Local politicians made ridiculous pension promises that demanded higher returns on investments in order to make it possible to pay them out.

Those derivatives you mock were only purchased because they promised to pay more than normal investments…even though the risk was supposed to be only nominally higher than boring treasury offerings.

GREED. Driven by rich, poor, and everyone in between.

It was ALL unsustainable the way it was done.
Last edited by YoUDeeMan on Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by YoUDeeMan »

LeadBolt wrote:The underlying cause of the financial collapse of 2008 was greed, coupled with relaxing of regulations and oversight meant to keep the financial system solvent.

I still don't like the government telling lending institutions to lower credit requirements because the government "has their back". I believe Obama, and other elected officials should cease and desist from such behavior.

I'm not sure what form the subsidy mentioned above takes. I am heavily invested in a small local bank that is profitable and has taken no bailout funds. One thing I do see from that perspective is a more than 30 times rise in their FDIC rates since 2007, although they have never filed a claim.

This small, conservatively run bank ($150MM) is in fact subsidizing the large banks that the government is pressuring to make risky loans through the rates charged by the FDIC system. The small, well run financial institutions of this country cannot continue to fund the too big to fail ones whom the government constantly bangs on to make risky loans.

We the people fund these bailouts. The role of the government should be to protect us from untoward greed thru prudent regulations and oversight, not to encourage risky behavior in a back door attempt to transfer wealth through encouraging sub-prime loans and failure to prudently regulate financial institutions.
:nod: :clap: :clap: :clap:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:
LeadBolt wrote:The underlying cause of the financial collapse of 2008 was greed, coupled with relaxing of regulations and oversight meant to keep the financial system solvent.

I still don't like the government telling lending institutions to lower credit requirements because the government "has their back". I believe Obama, and other elected officials should cease and desist from such behavior.

I'm not sure what form the subsidy mentioned above takes. I am heavily invested in a small local bank that is profitable and has taken no bailout funds. One thing I do see from that perspective is a more than 30 times rise in their FDIC rates since 2007, although they have never filed a claim.

This small, conservatively run bank ($150MM) is in fact subsidizing the large banks that the government is pressuring to make risky loans through the rates charged by the FDIC system. The small, well run financial institutions of this country cannot continue to fund the too big to fail ones whom the government constantly bangs on to make risky loans.

We the people fund these bailouts. The role of the government should be to protect us from untoward greed thru prudent regulations and oversight, not to encourage risky behavior in a back door attempt to transfer wealth through encouraging sub-prime loans and failure to prudently regulate financial institutions.
:nod: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Funny thing is I mostly agree with both of the above posts. Greed is human nature. Smart government keeps it in check enough to prevent us from imploding. :nod:

We haven't had smart government for quite sometime. :ohno:
Image
Image
Image
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:Funny thing is I mostly agree with both of the above posts. Greed is human nature. Smart government keeps it in check enough to prevent us from imploding. :nod:

We haven't had smart government for quite sometime. :ohno:
We haven't had enough smart voters for quite some time.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
LeadBolt wrote:It is so much easier to be an azzhole on an anonymous chat board, it brings out that in all of us. There is something Biblical about us all being azzholes, (Rom. 3:23), it part of the human condition.

While we seldom agree, you usually make good arguments for your points of view, however misguided they are...

Yes ,I do know those comments indicate I'm an azzhole, so I guess now I'm one of your favorite people...

:lol: :clap: :rofl: :o
Shut up asshole. :kisswink:

Now...back to the task at hand. Obama to (big) banks: make home loans to people with weak credit...but don't worry, we got your back (and by we, I mean the taxpayers via my administration's TBTF and too big to prosecute policies):
Lately, economists have tried to pin down exactly how much the subsidy lowers big banks’ borrowing costs. In one relatively thorough effort, two researchers -- Kenichi Ueda of the International Monetary Fund and Beatrice Weder di Mauro of the University of Mainz -- put the number at about 0.8 percentage point. The discount applies to all their liabilities, including bonds and customer deposits.

Big Difference
Small as it might sound, 0.8 percentage point makes a big difference. Multiplied by the total liabilities of the 10 largest U.S. banks by assets, it amounts to a taxpayer subsidy of $83 billion a year. To put the figure in perspective, it’s tantamount to the government giving the banks about 3 cents of every tax dollar collected.

The top five banks -- JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. - - account for $64 billion of the total subsidy, an amount roughly equal to their typical annual profits (see tables for data on individual banks). In other words, the banks occupying the commanding heights of the U.S. financial industry -- with almost $9 trillion in assets, more than half the size of the U.S. economy -- would just about break even in the absence of corporate welfare. In large part, the profits they report are essentially transfers from taxpayers to their shareholders.

Neither bank executives nor shareholders have much incentive to change the situation. On the contrary, the financial industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars every election cycle on campaign donations and lobbying, much of which is aimed at maintaining the subsidy. The result is a bloated financial sector and recurring credit gluts. Left unchecked, the superbanks could ultimately require bailouts that exceed the government’s resources. Picture a meltdown in which the Treasury is helpless to step in as it did in 2008 and 2009.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-2 ... year-.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Like I said... :coffee:
Yes, 80 basis points is huge in our industry. But, in looking at Table 2 in that report referenced, the amount of "support" (now THERE'S a generic term with multiple meanings) provided by government varies wildly, and the U.S. # is significantly lower than EVERY OTHER COUNTRY analyzed. In fact, even when they cull out all the NTBTF banks and take just the top 45 US banks, our support # (based on their calculations) is still lower than every country except Brazil and Turkey. And finally, aside from ratings agencies perception of gov't support leading to higher credit ratings and the ability of TBTF banks to issue bonds with lower interest rates (hence lower cost of funds), there really isn't any "corporate welfare" in that the subsidy isn't coming from the GOVERNMENT. The only subsidy from the government was TARP, and that was paid back with interest. I fail to see any connection between their report and a taxpayer subsidy.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by GannonFan »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Shut up asshole. :kisswink:

Now...back to the task at hand. Obama to (big) banks: make home loans to people with weak credit...but don't worry, we got your back (and by we, I mean the taxpayers via my administration's TBTF and too big to prosecute policies):



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-2 ... year-.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Like I said... :coffee:
Yes, 80 basis points is huge in our industry. But, in looking at Table 2 in that report referenced, the amount of "support" (now THERE'S a generic term with multiple meanings) provided by government varies wildly, and the U.S. # is significantly lower than EVERY OTHER COUNTRY analyzed. In fact, even when they cull out all the NTBTF banks and take just the top 45 US banks, our support # (based on their calculations) is still lower than every country except Brazil and Turkey. And finally, aside from ratings agencies perception of gov't support leading to higher credit ratings and the ability of TBTF banks to issue bonds with lower interest rates (hence lower cost of funds), there really isn't any "corporate welfare" in that the subsidy isn't coming from the GOVERNMENT. The only subsidy from the government was TARP, and that was paid back with interest. I fail to see any connection between their report and a taxpayer subsidy.
You need to use kalm's special glasses that show that all business activity is directly related to and subsidized by government. It's his way of saying "you didn't build that" without all the hype associated with that blurb.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:kalm,

You continue to blame the banks, Wall Street, and any other leviathan out there.

The fact is that everybody had a hand in the meltdown. EVERYONE.

It comes down to simple greed...and there are very few, with the exception of maybe Frodo...that do not have their own best interest in mind. Blaming things mostly on the banks is just foolish.

I'll recant a story I think I put on here a while back, but it is very relevant.

I sat in a room with only a handful of people, including one of the very top Bank of America executives (let's leave it at single digits..I don't want to get sued). We were deciding what to do with personnel regarding a few mergers (I was only concerned about my small areas, but my boss was absent so I was in there representing her as well). We really were not talking about cuts...we were talking about shuffling/reassigning responsibilities, reworking existing physical assets (buildings, phones, etc.), and in a lot of cases, simply renaming the existing positions (with a little training needed to bring the acquired folks up to speed). We needed people, so very, very few people would be let go...especially during the transition period.

This guy starts laughing...and I mean almost pissing his pants. They had decided that they were going to spread word about laying people off and shutting down facilities in a couple states in order to get money to do our renovations. They leaked that "layoff" story to the press and politicians, and sure enough, everyone started panicking. Offers of tens of millions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives started pouring in from each state if BOA would say they were saving a certain number of jobs for a certain amount of time.

WE WERE NOT GOING TO LAY THOSE PEOPLE OFF! In fact, we were very concerned about maintaining service and had plans to hire MORE people. But, instead of the bank paying for the retraining, systems integration, and facility upgrades (and we had plans to do just that), it was, instead, the TAXPAYERS in those states who paid for it.

I had to laugh when I saw our local paper naming the jobs that would be saved and in what facilities...and the cost to the state to "keep" them there. The same thing happened in the other states...big announcements from their state politicians about what a great job they did negotiating with the bank. :rofl: :rofl:

Every time I see the faces of the politicians involved, and I see them several times each year at small functions, I think about what suckers they were. They really have no idea of what they did and what they were up against. And, of course, the employees were in a panic, as were local businesses that were partially supported by those employees. News articles had them stating that our Governor and other representatives HAD to do something to save the economy. Use taxpayer money…just don’t allow my lunch patrons or retail operation to suffer.

in the end, EVERYONE was willing to have someone else (other taxpayers) pay in order to keep their little portion of the American dream going. It’s the American way…a culture drummed into everyone’s head.

And it wasn’t just in America…real estate bubbles and other forms of greed were happening all over as ordinary people tried to get in on the gold rush. Workers didn’t accept anything but large yearly increases in both salary and pension benefits. Local politicians made ridiculous pension promises that demanded higher returns on investments in order to make it possible to pay them out.

Those derivatives you mock were only purchased because they promised to pay more than normal investments…even though the risk was supposed to be only nominally higher than boring treasury offerings.

GREED. Driven by rich, poor, and everyone in between.

It was ALL unsustainable the way it was done.
Everyone has part of the blame. Lenders shouldn't have given homes to people that clearly couldn't afford it. People shouldn't have lived beyond thier means. People, especially those that had the means to pay, shouldn't have walked away from thier homes. The Gov't and Banks gave the wrong idea to a bunch of lemmings and we're paying for it.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by YoUDeeMan »

See, that's funny. You say the Government and the banks gave people the idea.

People gave themselves the idea. They watch TV and want what they see. "Community activists" at all levels, constantly tell their people they deserve a bigger slice of the pie.

Kalm should enjoy the irony...demand drove expectations...business just sold an avenue to those dreams. :lol:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by Ibanez »

Cluck U wrote:See, that's funny. You say the Government and the banks gave people the idea.

People gave themselves the idea. They watch TV and want what they see. "Community activists" at all levels, constantly tell their people they deserve a bigger slice of the pie.

Kalm should enjoy the irony...demand drove expectations...business just sold an avenue to those dreams. :lol:
The Government and the banks made the idea a reality. People who couldn't afford a mortgage or afford the mortgage they wanted weren't deterred by the lender. This, "gimme gimme gimme" mentality is reckless.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

Ibanez wrote:
Cluck U wrote:See, that's funny. You say the Government and the banks gave people the idea.

People gave themselves the idea. They watch TV and want what they see. "Community activists" at all levels, constantly tell their people they deserve a bigger slice of the pie.

Kalm should enjoy the irony...demand drove expectations...business just sold an avenue to those dreams. :lol:
The Government and the banks made the idea a reality. People who couldn't afford a mortgage or afford the mortgage they wanted weren't deterred by the lender. This, "gimme gimme gimme" mentality is reckless.
Yeah, because it's never OUR fault. It's always the fault of the government, or the corporation. :roll: :roll:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Ibanez wrote: The Government and the banks made the idea a reality. People who couldn't afford a mortgage or afford the mortgage they wanted weren't deterred by the lender. This, "gimme gimme gimme" mentality is reckless.
Yeah, because it's never OUR fault. It's always the fault of the government, or the corporation. :roll: :roll:
Pie in the sky reliance on rational self interest. Libertarianism has its limits. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:See, that's funny. You say the Government and the banks gave people the idea.

People gave themselves the idea. They watch TV and want what they see. "Community activists" at all levels, constantly tell their people they deserve a bigger slice of the pie.

Kalm should enjoy the irony...demand drove expectations...business just sold an avenue to those dreams. :lol:
I don't know if I'd call it irony. The demand was not wage driven, it was artificial. You can manufacture demand, literally change perception through marketing.

You should stick to better examples including human stupidity and greed. Viva la Haiti! :mrgreen:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Yeah, because it's never OUR fault. It's always the fault of the government, or the corporation. :roll: :roll:
Pie in the sky reliance on rational self interest. Libertarianism has its limits. :coffee:
Yeah, godforfuckingbid we rely on a rational self interest.


And you wonder why this country is going to shit? :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Pie in the sky reliance on rational self interest. Libertarianism has its limits. :coffee:
Yeah, godforfuckingbid we rely on a rational self interest.


And you wonder why this country is going to shit? :coffee:
It's not just this country and it's been around for eons. Self interest is not always rational in the grander scheme of a society...or an economy. :coffee: :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Obama to banks: make home loans to people with weak cred

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Yeah, godforfuckingbid we rely on a rational self interest.


And you wonder why this country is going to shit? :coffee:
It's not just this country and it's been around for eons. Self interest is not always rational in the grander scheme of a society...or an economy. :coffee: :coffee:
Maybe true. But OUR "rational self interest" has been on a rapidly declining slippery slope since the invention of entitlement programs and the development of the litigous society.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
Post Reply