Are You Patriotic?

Political discussions
Post Reply
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Are You Patriotic?

Post by kalm »

Do you think U.S. chartered corporations should be?
Did you know that about 80 percent of the ingredients in medicines Americans take now come from China and India where visits by FDA inspectors are infrequent and inadequate?

The lucrative U.S. drug industry – coddled with tax credits, free transfer of almost-ready-to-market drugs developed with U.S. taxpayer dollars via the National Institutes of Health – charges Americans the highest prices for drugs in the world and still wants more profits. Drug companies no longer produce many necessary medicines like penicillin in the U.S., preferring to pay slave wages abroad to import drugs back into the U.S.

Absence of patriotism has exposed our country to dependency on foreign suppliers for crucial medicines, and these foreign suppliers may not be so friendly in the future.

Recently, I wrote to the CEOs of the 20 largest U.S. corporations, asking if they would stand up at their annual shareholders’ meetings and on behalf of their U.S. chartered corporation (not on behalf of their boards of directors), and pledge allegiance to the flag ending with those glorious words “with liberty and justice for all.” Nineteen of the CEOs have not yet replied. One, Chevron, declined the pledge request but said their patriotism was demonstrated creating jobs and sparking economic activity in the U.S.

But when corporate lobbyists try to destroy our right of trial by jury for wrongful injuries – misnamed tort reform – when they destroy our freedom of contract – through all that brazenly one-sided fine print – when they corrupt our constitutional elections with money and unaccountable power, when they commercialize our education and patent our genes, and outsource jobs to other countries, the question of arrogantly rejected patriotism better be front-and-center for discussion by the American people.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/03/28-11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I'm still glad I voted for Ralphie in 2000. He was right then and still is. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by JohnStOnge »

But when corporate lobbyists try to destroy our right of trial by jury for wrongful injuries
There is no such right in the Constitution. The right to a trial by a jury has to do with when you are criminally charged.

Here it is (6th Amendment):
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence
I know you already knew that. But I'm just pointing out that the author inserted the premise of a right that does not exist. Also, I think we all know that the lawsuit situation in the United States has gotten entirely out of hand. How would you like to be a drug company executive having to worry about that. There are commercials on TV all the time by lawyers soliciting business from people to sue drug companies. No matter how good faith you are in developing a drug, there is no way to know whether it will cause unanticipated problems or not until it goes out into broad usage. You have to go through clinical trials to demonstrate "safety and effectiveness," but the number of doses administered during those trials is a small fraction of that which will be administered when the drug goes on the market. There is no WAY to be absolutely assured that something won't happen. And when it does the lawyers are ready to pounce.

So you think drug companies are bad? Try what it would be like without them.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by BlueHen86 »

JohnStOnge wrote:
But when corporate lobbyists try to destroy our right of trial by jury for wrongful injuries
There is no such right in the Constitution. The right to a trial by a jury has to do with when you are criminally charged.

Here it is (6th Amendment):
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence
I know you already knew that. But I'm just pointing out that the author inserted the premise of a right that does not exist. Also, I think we all know that the lawsuit situation in the United States has gotten entirely out of hand. How would you like to be a drug company executive having to worry about that. There are commercials on TV all the time by lawyers soliciting business from people to sue drug companies. No matter how good faith you are in developing a drug, there is no way to know whether it will cause unanticipated problems or not until it goes out into broad usage. You have to go through clinical trials to demonstrate "safety and effectiveness," but the number of doses administered during those trials is a small fraction of that which will be administered when the drug goes on the market. There is no WAY to be absolutely assured that something won't happen. And when it does the lawyers are ready to pounce.

So you think drug companies are bad? Try what it would be like without them.
They should have to do their clinical trials on lawyers. Either way, the public wins. :thumb:
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by GannonFan »

Recently, I wrote to the CEOs of the 20 largest U.S. corporations, asking if they would stand up at their annual shareholders’ meetings and on behalf of their U.S. chartered corporation (not on behalf of their boards of directors), and pledge allegiance to the flag ending with those glorious words “with liberty and justice for all.”
Really Kalm, the pledge of allegiance? That's what you're worried about? If they include the part of "under God" will that become the next controversy? Weren't the Japanese being "patriotic" when they protected all those banks and industries, which should've folded, from insolvency and then spend two decades in a quagmire of deflation and near zero growth? But hey, they really loved Japan and were patriotic. Maybe they didn't have a cool and catchy pledge of allegiance, maybe that's what was missing.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by grizzaholic »

Hell yeah I am Patriotic!

Image
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
DSUrocks07
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5339
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
I am a fan of: Delaware State
A.K.A.: phillywild305
Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by DSUrocks07 »

grizzaholic wrote:Hell yeah I am Patriotic!

Image
"You spelled 'an extremist' wrong."

- Liberals

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2
MEAC, last one out turn off the lights.

@phillywild305 FB
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote:
Recently, I wrote to the CEOs of the 20 largest U.S. corporations, asking if they would stand up at their annual shareholders’ meetings and on behalf of their U.S. chartered corporation (not on behalf of their boards of directors), and pledge allegiance to the flag ending with those glorious words “with liberty and justice for all.”
Really Kalm, the pledge of allegiance? That's what you're worried about? If they include the part of "under God" will that become the next controversy? Weren't the Japanese being "patriotic" when they protected all those banks and industries, which should've folded, from insolvency and then spend two decades in a quagmire of deflation and near zero growth? But hey, they really loved Japan and were patriotic. Maybe they didn't have a cool and catchy pledge of allegiance, maybe that's what was missing.
1) It's called satire

2) We're not Japan. Then again, we're not China either.

3) A simple "no" would have sufficed. Global free traders hate America.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by kalm »

JohnStOnge wrote:
But when corporate lobbyists try to destroy our right of trial by jury for wrongful injuries
There is no such right in the Constitution. The right to a trial by a jury has to do with when you are criminally charged.

Here it is (6th Amendment):
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence
I know you already knew that. But I'm just pointing out that the author inserted the premise of a right that does not exist. Also, I think we all know that the lawsuit situation in the United States has gotten entirely out of hand. How would you like to be a drug company executive having to worry about that. There are commercials on TV all the time by lawyers soliciting business from people to sue drug companies. No matter how good faith you are in developing a drug, there is no way to know whether it will cause unanticipated problems or not until it goes out into broad usage. You have to go through clinical trials to demonstrate "safety and effectiveness," but the number of doses administered during those trials is a small fraction of that which will be administered when the drug goes on the market. There is no WAY to be absolutely assured that something won't happen. And when it does the lawyers are ready to pounce.

So you think drug companies are bad? Try what it would be like without them.
Really? You don't have a right to sue somebody in this country? I'm no constitutional scholar but I always thought you could.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69187
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Are You Patriotic?

Post by kalm »

BTW, the answer to the question for a corporation is of course ...no. Why would they? Corporations are not living things. They are not people. If their charge is to be profitable, they should obviously seek every advantage imaginable and have zero sense of nationalistic pride or doing the right thing by the country they are chartered in. The are and should be parasitic. :nod:

However, the same could be said for real people as well. How about individuals who take advantage of off-shore tax havens, who profit from the outsourcing of domestic jobs? Should the wealthy be patriotic?

Image

How many multi-national companies were founded in the third world?
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply