Small local business with 13 long term employees.
I shouldn't have any problem finding a new tenant...
...maybe some govt. funded community organization.






+1000. Obama care is not about expanding medical care as is popularly believed, but rather about shrinking it, and the government choosing who gets treated and who does not, rather than individuals choosing the treatment that is appropriate for them. Like gun control, it is about the government control, not about the common good.GannonFan wrote:It's no secret that medical technology got the shaft in the legislation. Of course, considering that the future of medical care is rationing anyway, I suppose it had to be one of the first steps. One way to curtail the cost of medical care is to stop the advances in medical care that cost so much money.

Have you pondered the reason that the Obama administration let them write the bill?kalm wrote:I agree completely with you guys. Obamacare is a mess. It's too bad that for profit health insurance companies and pharma got to write the legislation. The again, it's a "free market" which means the winners get to write the rules...AmIright?![]()

When the government picks the winners and losers, it's not a "free market", but you knew that already.kalm wrote:I agree completely with you guys. Obamacare is a mess. It's too bad that for profit health insurance companies and pharma got to write the legislation. The again, it's a "free market" which means the winners get to write the rules...AmIright?![]()


And vice versa.Baldy wrote:When the government picks the winners and losers, it's not a "free market", but you knew that already.kalm wrote:I agree completely with you guys. Obamacare is a mess. It's too bad that for profit health insurance companies and pharma got to write the legislation. The again, it's a "free market" which means the winners get to write the rules...AmIright?![]()

Because Obama is a Stalin in dark face?CitadelGrad wrote:Have you pondered the reason that the Obama administration let them write the bill?kalm wrote:I agree completely with you guys. Obamacare is a mess. It's too bad that for profit health insurance companies and pharma got to write the legislation. The again, it's a "free market" which means the winners get to write the rules...AmIright?![]()
kalm wrote:And vice versa.Baldy wrote: When the government picks the winners and losers, it's not a "free market", but you knew that already.

Hey, Copernicus, he WAS a govt. funded community organization.travelinman67 wrote:Just finished a meeting with one of my commercial tenants who sells/leases medical equipment. A large portion of his business is medicare patients. He's been notified by medicare of their intent to cut their payment rates by 40% effective June 1. If done, he'll be forced to shut his doors.
Small local business with 13 long term employees.
I shouldn't have any problem finding a new tenant...
...maybe some govt. funded community organization.
kalm wrote:I agree completely with you guys. Obamacare is a mess. It's too bad that for profit health insurance companies and pharma got to write the legislation. The again, it's a "free market" which means the winners get to write the rules...AmIright?![]()


Well, on the other side of the coin, we've been operating in a whatever-medical-procedure/drug-you-want-whenever-you-want-it-and-preferably-free-or-heavily-subsidized-so-that-you-pay-little-or-nothing-for-it culture for a few decades now. It's an old person country and it's no wonder the "I don't have any kids in school, why do I need to pay school tax" mantra has gotten louder each year. I'm not sure they understand the rationing that's coming down the road, but then again, they may not be around by the time people need to wait for procedures or just forgo them entirely unless they are wealthy enough to find private care. Sure, this could go a long way to slowing down the speed of medical advances and breakthroughs, but it's a system that can't be sustained forever. Obamacare is all about rationining when you get down to it - but that in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing overall.LeadBolt wrote:+1000. Obama care is not about expanding medical care as is popularly believed, but rather about shrinking it, and the government choosing who gets treated and who does not, rather than individuals choosing the treatment that is appropriate for them. Like gun control, it is about the government control, not about the common good.GannonFan wrote:It's no secret that medical technology got the shaft in the legislation. Of course, considering that the future of medical care is rationing anyway, I suppose it had to be one of the first steps. One way to curtail the cost of medical care is to stop the advances in medical care that cost so much money.

There is no question that the population is aging and that medical care needed adjusting. Your bringing up public schools is interesting.GannonFan wrote:Well, on the other side of the coin, we've been operating in a whatever-medical-procedure/drug-you-want-whenever-you-want-it-and-preferably-free-or-heavily-subsidized-so-that-you-pay-little-or-nothing-for-it culture for a few decades now. It's an old person country and it's no wonder the "I don't have any kids in school, why do I need to pay school tax" mantra has gotten louder each year. I'm not sure they understand the rationing that's coming down the road, but then again, they may not be around by the time people need to wait for procedures or just forgo them entirely unless they are wealthy enough to find private care. Sure, this could go a long way to slowing down the speed of medical advances and breakthroughs, but it's a system that can't be sustained forever. Obamacare is all about rationining when you get down to it - but that in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing overall.LeadBolt wrote:
+1000. Obama care is not about expanding medical care as is popularly believed, but rather about shrinking it, and the government choosing who gets treated and who does not, rather than individuals choosing the treatment that is appropriate for them. Like gun control, it is about the government control, not about the common good.

The problem is, Obamacare won't let you pay out of pocket anymore. You HAVE to have insurance.mrklean wrote:One of the reasons we have Obamacare.
If I pay for an MRI out of pocket, the Hospital will charge me $800.00
If I have Insurance, the Hospital charges my Insurance company $2500.00
Yes this happens in AMERICA!!!!!

Got something to back up that claim?mrklean wrote:One of the reasons we have Obamacare.
If I pay for an MRI out of pocket, the Hospital will charge me $800.00
If I have Insurance, the Hospital charges my Insurance company $2500.00
Yes this happens in AMERICA!!!!!


I’ve heard similar stories. A friend of mine calls around for the cash price (i.e. non-insurance price) for certain procedures. She does so because her insurance doesn’t cover certain tests she needs (not sure what medical condition she has, but it’s something she has to stay on top of otherwise she falls ill rather quickly). Now that everyone/doctors will have to use/go through insurance, that cash price option no longer exists and people are subject to whatever “agreed upon” rates doctors have with insurance companies.89Hen wrote:Got something to back up that claim?mrklean wrote:One of the reasons we have Obamacare.
If I pay for an MRI out of pocket, the Hospital will charge me $800.00
If I have Insurance, the Hospital charges my Insurance company $2500.00
Yes this happens in AMERICA!!!!!

The bill I just got from my MRI I had on my left knee. My co-pay was 250.00, I asked a guy who was sitting next to me, how much did they charge him. HE tod me that the price for people who did not have insurance was 800.00.89Hen wrote:Got something to back up that claim?mrklean wrote:One of the reasons we have Obamacare.
If I pay for an MRI out of pocket, the Hospital will charge me $800.00
If I have Insurance, the Hospital charges my Insurance company $2500.00
Yes this happens in AMERICA!!!!!

Well, the illegal immigrant sitting next to him paid nothing.mrklean wrote:The bill I just got from my MRI I had on my left knee. My co-pay was 250.00, I asked a guy who was sitting next to me, how much did they charge him. HE tod me that the price for people who did not have insurance was 800.00.89Hen wrote: Got something to back up that claim?

89Hen wrote:Got something to back up that claim?mrklean wrote:One of the reasons we have Obamacare.
If I pay for an MRI out of pocket, the Hospital will charge me $800.00
If I have Insurance, the Hospital charges my Insurance company $2500.00
Yes this happens in AMERICA!!!!!

You stated $2,500.mrklean wrote:The bill I just got from my MRI I had on my left knee. My co-pay was 250.00, I asked a guy who was sitting next to me, how much did they charge him. HE tod me that the price for people who did not have insurance was 800.00.89Hen wrote: Got something to back up that claim?

klean's co-pay was $250. The hospoital charged his insurance company $2,500. The guy next to klean got the white guy/sane person discount of $800.Ibanez wrote:You stated $2,500.mrklean wrote:
The bill I just got from my MRI I had on my left knee. My co-pay was 250.00, I asked a guy who was sitting next to me, how much did they charge him. HE tod me that the price for people who did not have insurance was 800.00.

It's not the patients driving this, GF. Part of it is defensive medicine. Doctors are so terrified of being sued that they take absolutely no chances and order tests that are really not needed.GannonFan wrote:
Well, on the other side of the coin, we've been operating in a whatever-medical-procedure/drug-you-want-whenever-you-want-it-and-preferably-free-or-heavily-subsidized-so-that-you-pay-little-or-nothing-for-it culture for a few decades now.