Black on Black Crime?

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:23 am

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/12/de ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

How long before the left lets this POS out so he can commit more intelligent decisions like voting for Obama and attempted murder of a deaf man.

Democrat POS

psychoCAT · Post by **psychoCAT** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:35 am

BAN THE KNIVES!!! BAN THE KNIVES!!! BAN THE KNIVES!!! WHERE'S BIDEN?!!!

D1B · Post by **D1B** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:10 pm

AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb fucker. Gang members are fucking conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

Post by **SDHornet** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:23 pm

D1B wrote:AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb fucker. Gang members are fucking conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

Well played...

Post by **Col Hogan** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 2:49 pm

D1B wrote:AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb ****. Gang members are **** conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

I'm sure all those gang members voted for Romney...

D1B · Post by **D1B** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 2:58 pm

Col Hogan wrote:
D1B wrote:AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb ****. Gang members are **** conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

I'm sure all those gang members voted for Romney...

A shitload of conks didn't vote for Romney.

Post by **Col Hogan** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:07 pm

D1B wrote:
Col Hogan wrote:

I'm sure all those gang members voted for Romney...
A shitload of conks didn't vote for Romney.

Because he wasn't a true conservative...

But you knew that...

Now, gang-bangers...I'll concede to your vast knowledge in that arena...

D1B · Post by **D1B** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:36 pm

Col Hogan wrote:
D1B wrote:
A shitload of conks didn't vote for Romney.
Because he wasn't a true conservative...

But you knew that...

Now, gang-bangers...I'll concede to your vast knowledge in that arena...

Shit, Hogan, you know their voting habits. You obviously know more about em. I concede.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:10 pm

Col Hogan wrote:
D1B wrote:AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb ****. Gang members are **** conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

I'm sure all those gang members voted for Romney...

They didn't vote for anybody.

Which benefits the conks.

@ ALPACAJIZZ1 abusing his constitutional right to be a dumb squat way beyond what is necessary for conk membership.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:44 am

houndawg wrote:
They didn't vote for anybody.

Which benefits the conks.

Please put down the crack pipe and take a trip to one of the coasts. The lack of salt air is killing your brain cells.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:43 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
houndawg wrote:
They didn't vote for anybody.

Which benefits the conks.

Please put down the crack pipe and take a trip to one of the coasts. The lack of salt air is killing your brain cells.

You think gangsta's vote? And low voter turnout definitely benefits conks.

Both true statements.

Dawg is smart enough to realize both costs are liberal, but there is only one left coast.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:10 am

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:
Please put down the crack pipe and take a trip to one of the coasts. The lack of salt air is killing your brain cells.
You think gangsta's vote? And low voter turnout definitely benefits conks. Both true statements.

Dawg is smart enough to realize both costs are liberal, but there is only one left coast.

Thank you for explaining that to our special friend.

So easy to overestimate the ability of the conk mind, such as it is, to infer.

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:26 am

You cant even defend yourself, feed yourself or get a job on your own but you are smart enough to understand a vastly superior thinking person?

You might be able to sell that to the people down at the trailer box............but I am not buying.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:27 am

houndawg wrote:
kalm wrote:
You think gangsta's vote? And low voter turnout definitely benefits conks. Both true statements.

Dawg is smart enough to realize both costs are liberal, but there is only one left coast.
Thank you for explaining that to our special friend.

So easy to overestimate the ability of the conk mind, such as it is, to infer.

You liberals are funny.

Don't know crap about creating private sector jobs or growing the economy, but funny.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:43 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
houndawg wrote:
Thank you for explaining that to our special friend.

So easy to overestimate the ability of the conk mind, such as it is, to infer.
You liberals are funny.

Don't know crap about creating private sector jobs or growing the economy, but funny.

Demand comes from innovation (education and science) and wages (working folks). Pie in the sky utopic economic theories which have never worked...anywhere, come from conks. Gangstas are a good example of conk economics.

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:46 am

Kalm you have 2 minutes and 41 seconds to prove that Obama has created any jobs in 5 years..........if you dont I am going to kick Screaming BEagle in the taint the next time he comes to Missoula.

Post by **grizzaholic** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:49 am

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Kalm you have 2 minutes and 41 seconds to prove that Obama has created any jobs in 5 years..........if you dont I am going to kick Screaming BEagle in the taint the next time he comes to Missoula.

I do that every year.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 11:58 am

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Kalm you have 2 minutes and 41 seconds to prove that Obama has created any jobs in 5 years..........if you dont I am going to kick Screaming BEagle in the taint the next time he comes to Missoula.

Obama's a moderate Republican. He's your boy. So no. But I'll hold him down for ya. SE that is.

YoUDeeMan · Post by **YoUDeeMan** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:46 pm

kalm wrote: Demand comes from innovation (education and science) and wages (working folks). Pie in the sky utopic economic theories which have never worked...anywhere, come from conks.

The pet rock was from science, education, and innovation? Cabbage Patch Kids were from science, education, and innovation? Snanke oil salesmen sales came from science, education and innovation? Air Jordans came from science, education, and innovation? The Indians' demand for cheap beads came from science, education, and innovation?

Money (which creates marketing) is responsible for today's demand. Big money fools little money into buying what big money wants them to buy.

Science, education and innovation...responsibile for the content and high demand (ratings) of daytime soaps and reality TV.

Jesus, kalm, you are one funny dude.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:46 pm

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote: Demand comes from innovation (education and science) and wages (working folks). Pie in the sky utopic economic theories which have never worked...anywhere, come from conks.

The pet rock was from science, education, and innovation? Cabbage Patch Kids were from science, education, and innovation? Snanke oil salesmen sales came from science, education and innovation? Air Jordans came from science, education, and innovation? The Indians' demand for cheap beads came from science, education, and innovation?

Money (which creates marketing) is responsible for today's demand. Big money fools little money into buying what big money wants them to buy.

Science, education and innovation...responsibile for the content and high demand (ratings) of daytime soaps and reality TV.

Jesus, kalm, you are one funny dude.

Oh for fuck's sake relax Clucky. A healthly modern economy isn't driven by cabbage patch kids, snake oil, or seashells (btw, that was a nice addition

)

But I'm sure glad the trillions sitting on the sidelines have chosen to back pet rocks!...

GannonFan · Post by **GannonFan** » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:29 am

kalm wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: You liberals are funny.

Don't know crap about creating private sector jobs or growing the economy, but funny.
Demand comes from innovation (education and science) and wages (working folks). Pie in the sky utopic economic theories which have never worked...anywhere, come from conks. Gangstas are a good example of conk economics.

Keynes was a conk? Who knew?

mrklean · Post by **mrklean** » Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:20 am

GannonFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Demand comes from innovation (education and science) and wages (working folks). Pie in the sky utopic economic theories which have never worked...anywhere, come from conks. Gangstas are a good example of conk economics.

Keynes was a conk? Who knew?

Me!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YoUDeeMan · Post by **YoUDeeMan** » Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:09 pm

kalm wrote: Oh for fuck's sake relax Clucky. A healthly modern economy isn't driven by cabbage patch kids, snake oil, or seashells (btw, that was a nice addition )

But I'm sure glad the trillions sitting on the sidelines have chosen to back pet rocks!...

Who said anything about a healthy economy? Money rules...and America doesn't run on Dunkin Donuts...it runs on convincing everyone that they need the latest and greatest gadget - usually intentionally made to be replaced every few years.

THAT is what drives our economy...consumer spending...mostly on unecessary, disposable crap.

And the stuff that is "necessary" is designed to fail/be outdated so that you will need/want another one in 5-10 years.

The whole housing market is a boom for the economy because of the need for Americans to fill those houses with STUFF.

We are the leading economy in the world...with China right behind, because we purchase things to make our lives easier...but things we really don't need. Marketing...keeping up with the Joneses...drives demand.

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:21 pm

So I guess we need to check on what the environmental lead levels were where Robert Jarell was born, right? Only thing is he wasn't 23 years old yet.

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:25 pm

D1B wrote:AlpacaJizz - you're a dumb ****. Gang members are **** conk to the bone.

They're pro gun
They want to keep drugs illegal and
They make massive profits from the conks failed war on drugs
They love flaunting wealth
They prey on the poor and infirm

They're about as conk as they get.

And to the extent that they voted they voted like 90% for Obama. I guarantee it. Well, except for the White Supremecist gang members. But, overall, I can guarantee you that the overwhelming majority of "gang" types voted for Obama if they voted.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Black on Black Crime?

Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?

Re: Black on Black Crime?