Wedgebuster wrote:If you want to put blame where it belongs, it is in fact the teabaggers of 2010. Even their fellow Republicans hate 'em.
"YEP, WE MIGHT HAVE A PORCH MONKEY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT HE AIN'T A GONNA SPEND ANY MY MONEY"
, they really went there 
At least the Tea Baggers provide laughter...well, that's about all they provide.mrklean wrote:Wedgebuster wrote:If you want to put blame where it belongs, it is in fact the teabaggers of 2010. Even their fellow Republicans hate 'em.
"YEP, WE MIGHT HAVE A PORCH MONKEY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT HE AIN'T A GONNA SPEND ANY MY MONEY"
WHITE SLAVERY, I mean you can't make this **** up
I voted for Willie Nelson, bro. Doin' my part...Ibanez wrote:Very true. However, none of you have the balls to vote out incumbents. None of you have the balls to vote for real change or at least a third party.TheDancinMonarch wrote:
In general I agree but "we" own a share of the blame. "We" reelect a large share of the Congress with every opportunity and "we" reelected both 43 and 44.
First, my vote against Mitt Romney in SC was not a vote for Obama. I voted Johnson becuase we need a third party. You say 2004 and 2008 weren't the times to bring change. When is the time for change? EVERY Election is the time for change.CAA Flagship wrote:The last two elections were not the times to birth a third party. The financial crisis that we continue to face needs to be the number one priority and lead by the party that can be the most responsible for making good financial decisions. Anyone who thinks the Donks are better than the Conks regarding fiscal responsibility is outright lying....................................... or ignorant.TheDancinMonarch wrote:
Both major parties are only interested in short term political victories. The fact that the country swirls faster and faster down the drain is apparently of no concern to either of them just as long as they get their Pyrrhic victories. So let's continue to reward them for their efforts.
I couldn't agree more.Anyone who thinks the Donks are better than the Conks regarding fiscal responsibility is outright lying....................................... or ignorant.
houndawg wrote:I voted for Willie Nelson, bro. Doin' my part...Ibanez wrote:
Very true. However, none of you have the balls to vote out incumbents. None of you have the balls to vote for real change or at least a third party.
True. White Slavery inthe 21st Century is as non Existent as Black slavery from 1865-Present day.mrklean wrote:Wedgebuster wrote:If you want to put blame where it belongs, it is in fact the teabaggers of 2010. Even their fellow Republicans hate 'em.
"YEP, WE MIGHT HAVE A PORCH MONKEY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BUT HE AIN'T A GONNA SPEND ANY MY MONEY"
WHITE SLAVERY, I mean you can't make this shit up
CAA Flagship wrote:The last two elections were not the times to birth a third party. The financial crisis that we continue to face needs to be the number one priority and lead by the party that can be the most responsible for making good financial decisions. Anyone who thinks the Donks are better than the Conks regarding fiscal responsibility is outright lying....................................... or ignorant.TheDancinMonarch wrote:
Both major parties are only interested in short term political victories. The fact that the country swirls faster and faster down the drain is apparently of no concern to either of them just as long as they get their Pyrrhic victories. So let's continue to reward them for their efforts.
No. I said the last two elections. That means 2008 and 2012. The elections from 1984 and 2004 would have been an acceptable time to push for a third party. When you are facing the worst financial crisis since the great depression, the most important thing is to ensure the Donks don't grab hold of the steering wheel.Ibanez wrote: First, my vote against Mitt Romney in SC was not a vote for Obama. I voted Johnson becuase we need a third party. You say 2004 and 2008 weren't the times to bring change. When is the time for change? EVERY Election is the time for change.
So which one is it for you? Liar or ignorant?houndawg wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: The last two elections were not the times to birth a third party. The financial crisis that we continue to face needs to be the number one priority and lead by the party that can be the most responsible for making good financial decisions. Anyone who thinks the Donks are better than the Conks regarding fiscal responsibility is outright lying....................................... or ignorant.
What? You were born after 2008?
Looks like Conks and Donks are quite capable of steering this car off the cliff. I think Conks are allergic to the term "fiscal responsibility" as they seem incapable of actually exerting it.CAA Flagship wrote:No. I said the last two elections. That means 2008 and 2012. The elections from 1984 and 2004 would have been an acceptable time to push for a third party. When you are facing the worst financial crisis since the great depression, the most important thing is to ensure the Donks don't grab hold of the steering wheel.Ibanez wrote: First, my vote against Mitt Romney in SC was not a vote for Obama. I voted Johnson becuase we need a third party. You say 2004 and 2008 weren't the times to bring change. When is the time for change? EVERY Election is the time for change.
I have no concept of time.CAA Flagship wrote:No. I said the last two elections. That means 2008 and 2012. The elections from 1984 and 2004 would have been an acceptable time to push for a third party. When you are facing the worst financial crisis since the great depression, the most important thing is to ensure the Donks don't grab hold of the steering wheel.Ibanez wrote: First, my vote against Mitt Romney in SC was not a vote for Obama. I voted Johnson becuase we need a third party. You say 2004 and 2008 weren't the times to bring change. When is the time for change? EVERY Election is the time for change.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFLysouG86I[/youtube]Ibanez wrote:I have no concept of time.CAA Flagship wrote: No. I said the last two elections. That means 2008 and 2012. The elections from 1984 and 2004 would have been an acceptable time to push for a third party. When you are facing the worst financial crisis since the great depression, the most important thing is to ensure the Donks don't grab hold of the steering wheel.
What country?Ibanez wrote:True. White Slavery inthe 21st Century is as non Existent as Black slavery from 1865-Present day.mrklean wrote:
WHITE SLAVERY, I mean you can't make this **** up
The United States of America.mrklean wrote:What country?Ibanez wrote:
True. White Slavery inthe 21st Century is as non Existent as Black slavery from 1865-Present day.
We all know you're racists and blame the shortcomings of blacks on white people. There is no need for you to discuss your distorted, racist, alternative history.
A third party (libertarians) will be the only way to get deep spending cuts throughout the government. Both parties are going to keep spending no matter what until someone has the balls to actually say enough is enough.The last two elections were not the times to birth a third party. The financial crisis that we continue to face needs to be the number one priority and lead by the party that can be the most responsible for making good financial decisions. Anyone who thinks the Donks are better than the Conks regarding fiscal responsibility is outright lying....................................... or ignorant.
No. Slavery is the when someone is bound in servitude to another. He is a racist and should choose his words more carefully.psychoCAT wrote:Ibanez,
I will actually defend kleeny on this one. Jim Crow and affirmative action are nothing more than invisible shackles and chains. THink Greensboro in the 1960s.
