You wouldnt know hip or decent art of it smacked you in the face.Baldy wrote:Sure, they'll always be as hip as Poison and Motley Crue.eagleskins wrote:
RATM is always going to be hip. Revolutionaries. Stick with Toby Keith.
Lmao at Lester Baldy.
You wouldnt know hip or decent art of it smacked you in the face.Baldy wrote:Sure, they'll always be as hip as Poison and Motley Crue.eagleskins wrote:
RATM is always going to be hip. Revolutionaries. Stick with Toby Keith.

Well, art is a subjective subject, enemabag.D1B wrote:You wouldnt know hip or decent art of it smacked you in the face.Baldy wrote: Sure, they'll always be as hip as Poison and Motley Crue.
Lmao at Lester Baldy.
JMU DJ wrote:LeadBolt wrote:Only in America would bands and chicken sandwiches be political statements.![]()
![]()
Suppose you don't read the news much... band in Russia named "Pussy Riot" just got sentenced to two years in jail for a political protest.
I guess the Beatles also never wrote any political songs or that their members never voiced their political opinions?
I suppose they lyrics to "Gimmie Shelter" and "Street fighting man" are all bubble gum and rainbows.
Bob Marley's "Get Up Stand UP" was just a plea to stand up for your rights, to party
U2's "Sunday, Bloody Sunday" was about the bands brunch ritual of drinking bloody mary's.
CID1990 wrote:Morello is also an avid and vocal supporter of the reconquista. Not surprising that Eagleskins and other pseudo Americans would admire him.
I am actually rather disappointed that Ryan didn't know about this guy. Then again, maybe he did and just likes the music without bothering to look up the politics of the musician. I like the music of a lot of personally reprehensible musicians, but I'm not looking for bumper music for my election rallies, either.
No it isn't, dumbass. Maybe to philistines like you.Baldy wrote:Well, art is a subjective subject, enemabag.D1B wrote:
You wouldnt know hip or decent art of it smacked you in the face.
Lmao at Lester Baldy.![]()
You think semen stained papal garments are art...to each his own.![]()
Anytime you wanna compare art collections, lemme know.![]()
http://dronetalker.blogspot.com/2012/04 ... eally.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Art is subjective...not really. I get it, art isn't science and therefore cannot be accurately defined to a tenth of a tenth of a decimal place. I am aware that one person cannot predict how another person is going to receive and interpret a piece of art. It is within this little pocket of ambiguity that the vapid morons, rhythmically challenged foot tappers and childish scribblers reside. The argument is that as long as I like it then it is art but that is not necessarily true. If you/me/they like it then it can be considered entertainment. To be considered art, the work needs to be something much greater.
Art is comprised of two sections: 1) form and 2) content. Form covers the materials and skills used to create the art and the content is the portrayed/inferred meaning of the art. Work that is created without advanced skill is going to be flawed in design thus the form will be bad. Bad form can be compensated for and overcome by those of us who have intense drive and perspective. But, these few are the exception to the rule. As I referenced earlier we tend to grasp tightly to these exceptions to the rule in an attempt to elevate the crap that we listen to and look at to an undeserved level of greatness.

Ibanez wrote:Jeresy girls.
And they get it, at THE University of Delaware.CAA Flagship wrote:Ibanez wrote:Jeresy girls.
Women with mustaches and chest hair need love too.




Why is he a prick? Because he has a different opinion than you? These days, a prick is anyone who disagrees with the conservative view. Sad...really.JohnStOnge wrote:More evidence that entertainers tend to be pricks. Well, maybe country music people aren't as bad. But, in general, the population of entertainers does appear to have a much higher proportion of pricks than the general population does.
This guy is clearly a prick.

Politicians are PRICKSJohnStOnge wrote:More evidence that entertainers tend to be pricks. Well, maybe country music people aren't as bad. But, in general, the population of entertainers does appear to have a much higher proportion of pricks than the general population does.
This guy is clearly a prick.

Elitists are PRICKS!Chizzang wrote:Politicians are PRICKSJohnStOnge wrote:More evidence that entertainers tend to be pricks. Well, maybe country music people aren't as bad. But, in general, the population of entertainers does appear to have a much higher proportion of pricks than the general population does.
This guy is clearly a prick.
Famous Entertainers are PRICKS
They deserve each other - in fact I have successfully argued they are in fact identical

Hey now wait a second there....kalm wrote:Elitists are PRICKS!Chizzang wrote:
Politicians are PRICKS
Famous Entertainers are PRICKS
They deserve each other - in fact I have successfully argued they are in fact identical