Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:33 am

I recently conducted research and a working group and have come to the conclusion that JSO posts (to include threads he has started) are sub-optimal. My findings will be published next month.

Would anyone want an autograph copy?

Spoiler: show: Autograph copy includes a rainbow bracelet

Post by **kalm** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:33 am

I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:09 am

Are there any pictures of girl-girl stuff in this report? Just wonderin.

JoltinJoe · Post by **JoltinJoe** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:18 am

kalm wrote:I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.

I think that the strategy of that study: to bore you into conceding defeat.

Post by **andy7171** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:48 am

Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:52 am

kalm wrote:I liked the part on page 760, 3rd paragraph about the influence of James Dobson on a posters credibility.

That was some nice work there...for an observational study.

Thank you. I can't take all the credit, there were so many posters on here that contributed.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:54 am

andy7171 wrote:Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?

Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

Post by **andy7171** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:55 am

Ibanez wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?
Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:57 am

andy7171 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.
When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.

Oh. Well if you buy my report you can see her on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

Post by **kalm** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:06 am

andy7171 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Yes, see her full length pictures on pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.

CAA
Yes, there will be girl on girl action. See pages 6, 43, 46-47, 75, 90, 150, 155, 470 and 800.
When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.

Cheap skate 93hen move.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:27 am

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote: When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheap skate 93hen move.

Twink Ogres need love too.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:31 am

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote: When I said "Will pictures of JSO's sister be included?" I meant, will someone post a picture of JSOs sister again. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheap skate 93hen move.

That's page 75.

Post by **andy7171** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:40 am

will someone post the tits already!?!

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:52 am

andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!

That's page 6.

Post by **grizzaholic** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:54 am

andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!

Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:56 am

grizzaholic wrote:
andy7171 wrote:will someone post the tits already!?!
Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Is that mother-daughter action?

Post by **grizzaholic** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:56 am

CAA Flagship wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
Here is the only pic you will get, otherwise buy the damn book yourself. I got an advanced copy.

Is that mother-daughter action?

You know it.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:01 am

Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:17 am

CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?

Are we talking twins?

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:18 am

grizzaholic wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: Is that mother-daughter action?
You know it.

Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?
Are we talking twins?

Twin daughters or Twin Mother(mother, mothers twin sister and daughter).

Since this IS based on JSO, it's Twin Mothers and thier Twin daughters. Because incest is natural (as he states.)

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote:Which begs the question:
Would you rather have sisters or mother-daughter threesome?
Are we talking twins?

They can be included in the "sisters" group. I didn't want to limit it to just twins when there are plenty of non-twin sisters out there.

Post by **grizzaholic** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:20 am

Ibanez wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
You know it.
Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue.

3 pages of photos of JBB and his gay porn collection?

And I am Grizza, Grizo is a HOF'er.

Post by **Ibanez** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:22 am

grizzaholic wrote:
Ibanez wrote: Grizzo, I hope you notice how much you are appreciated. I put my thoughts on your countless hours of assistance in the prologue.
3 pages of photos of JBB and his gay porn collection?

And I am Grizza, Grizo is a HOF'er.

No, JBB isn't included.

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:25 am

Wait.......Twin Mothers with Twin Daughters?

[youtube][/youtube]

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"

Re: Study: Outcome of JSO posts are "sub optimal"