Ban college football?
-
bonarae
- Level2

- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:16 pm
- I am a fan of: Harvard, ETSU, UC Davis
- Location: the other side of the globe
- Contact:
Ban college football?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 94220.html
I think the author has seen enough of the problems that plague FBS football. Interesting discussion though. But he doesn't mention at all the sustainable football programs at the FCS, D-II and D-III levels or other sports as well.
I think the author has seen enough of the problems that plague FBS football. Interesting discussion though. But he doesn't mention at all the sustainable football programs at the FCS, D-II and D-III levels or other sports as well.
All the Ivy League needs to become relevant again is to diversify its OOC schedule.
- CatBlitz22
- Level2

- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:02 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State
- Location: Bozeman, MT
Re: Ban college football?
No way this happens. Get out the torches and pitchforks if it ever gets close to it.

- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Ban college football?
How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become? 
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Ban college football?
Also need to focus on steering kids towards fields that sustain and advance society, but that's a discussion for another thread.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20858
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Ban college football?
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Ban college football?
Those costs reflect the rising admin and operating costs that plague universities. Insurance, research, salaries, housing all cost more. CCU recently voted to NOT raise tuition in spite of adding new programs, academically and athletics.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Ban college football?
The single biggest reason for the high cost of college tuition is the ongoing debacle of the feds bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Government-backed student loans have created an artificially-inflated market price for education. This has allowed more people than ever before to attend and get a college education albeit with massive amounts of student loan debt when they graduate. At the same time, the college degree has become almost a mass-produced commodity, dramatically cutting its value both in terms of quality and quantity.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
In short, more higher education won't solve the current "idiocracy" but rather is somewhat responsible for it.
Re: Ban college football?
I think the idea that everyone needs a 4 year degree has done harm. WE need mechanics, ditch diggers, truck drivers. Truck drivers don't nee a 4 year degree from Clemson.Libertine wrote:The single biggest reason for the high cost of college tuition is the ongoing debacle of the feds bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Government-backed student loans have created an artificially-inflated market price for education. This has allowed more people than ever before to attend and get a college education albeit with massive amounts of student loan debt when they graduate. At the same time, the college degree has become almost a mass-produced commodity, dramatically cutting its value both in terms of quality and quantity.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
In short, more higher education won't solve the current "idiocracy" but rather is somewhat responsible for it.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Ban college football?
Very good point.If you want to establish a minor league system that the National Football League pays for—which they should, given that they are the greatest beneficiaries of college football—that is fine.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- CID1990
- Level5

- Posts: 25486
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Ban college football?
But that's all a clempson degree is good for.Ibanez wrote:I think the idea that everyone needs a 4 year degree has done harm. WE need mechanics, ditch diggers, truck drivers. Truck drivers don't nee a 4 year degree from Clemson.Libertine wrote:
The single biggest reason for the high cost of college tuition is the ongoing debacle of the feds bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Government-backed student loans have created an artificially-inflated market price for education. This has allowed more people than ever before to attend and get a college education albeit with massive amounts of student loan debt when they graduate. At the same time, the college degree has become almost a mass-produced commodity, dramatically cutting its value both in terms of quality and quantity.
In short, more higher education won't solve the current "idiocracy" but rather is somewhat responsible for it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk while driving on the interstate and brushing my teeth.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Re: Ban college football?
If you found this article interesting (as I did) don't miss reading the 300 plus comments attached to the article. Opinions from all across the board; fascinating...
Re: Ban college football?
Badum-bum!CID1990 wrote:But that's all a clempson degree is good for.Ibanez wrote:
I think the idea that everyone needs a 4 year degree has done harm. WE need mechanics, ditch diggers, truck drivers. Truck drivers don't nee a 4 year degree from Clemson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk while driving on the interstate and brushing my teeth.
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: Ban college football?
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't we have more people than ever graduating from colleges and universities?
Furthermore, educational attainment rates have been climbing for quite some time....so why don't people seem smarter? Frankly, it is shocking when you see some of today's "graduates" speak...and even more shocking when you see them try to work through a problem.
And just how many college degrees does a janitor need?
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
-
BigSkyBears
- Level2

- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
- I am a fan of: Northern Colorado
Re: Ban college football?
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
All I can say is that universities in Colorado have had to raise tuition because the tax payers won't support the universities with their tax dollars. Some, such as CU have suggesting transitioning into a private school.
As for article. I can understand his point of view. Some cultures are absolutely way too obsessed with football. Look at SEC's schools or Michigan or Ohio State. Look at some cultures on a smaller scale like Montana. It would be great if they were that obsessed over academics. However, I'm a realist so I understand that's not going to happen.

- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Ban college football?
I disagree with this. I have no idea how it is in CO but in CA over half of the state budget goes to education and yet the academic types are screaming bloody murder over raising tuition and want the tax payers to fund education even more. Their energy needs to be focused on the administrative waste at all levels of education before targeting the tax payers to pony up more money. Throwing more money at the problem will not solve it.BigSkyBears wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
All I can say is that universities in Colorado have had to raise tuition because the tax payers won't support the universities with their tax dollars. Some, such as CU have suggesting transitioning into a private school.
As for article. I can understand his point of view. Some cultures are absolutely way too obsessed with football. Look at SEC's schools or Michigan or Ohio State. Look at some cultures on a smaller scale like Montana. It would be great if they were that obsessed over academics. However, I'm a realist so I understand that's not going to happen.
- tampajag
- Supporter

- Posts: 7515
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:09 am
- I am a fan of: whooties
- A.K.A.: hamburger pimp
- Location: clearwater, fl bwo tampa bwo baton rouge
Re: Ban college football?
nor do they need it to deliver pizzasIbanez wrote:I think the idea that everyone needs a 4 year degree has done harm. WE need mechanics, ditch diggers, truck drivers. Truck drivers don't nee a 4 year degree from Clemson.Libertine wrote:
The single biggest reason for the high cost of college tuition is the ongoing debacle of the feds bailing out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Government-backed student loans have created an artificially-inflated market price for education. This has allowed more people than ever before to attend and get a college education albeit with massive amounts of student loan debt when they graduate. At the same time, the college degree has become almost a mass-produced commodity, dramatically cutting its value both in terms of quality and quantity.
In short, more higher education won't solve the current "idiocracy" but rather is somewhat responsible for it.

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Ban college football?
Hey, Mr Realist, why don't you take a look at where your little junior college falls in national rankings before you start talking academic smack?BigSkyBears wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?
All I can say is that universities in Colorado have had to raise tuition because the tax payers won't support the universities with their tax dollars. Some, such as CU have suggesting transitioning into a private school.
As for article. I can understand his point of view. Some cultures are absolutely way too obsessed with football. Look at SEC's schools or Michigan or Ohio State. Look at some cultures on a smaller scale like Montana. It would be great if they were that obsessed over academics. However, I'm a realist so I understand that's not going to happen.
Re: Ban college football?
Cluck U wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:How about we cut costs by lowering the absurdly high price of tuition, thus allowing more people to attend college and get an education in order to better contribute to an intelligent society, instead of the idiocracy that we've become?![]()
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't we have more people than ever graduating from colleges and universities?
Furthermore, educational attainment rates have been climbing for quite some time....so why don't people seem smarter? Frankly, it is shocking when you see some of today's "graduates" speak...and even more shocking when you see them try to work through a problem.
And just how many college degrees does a janitor need?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- UNI88
- Supporter

- Posts: 30834
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: Ban college football?
From Sports Illustrated - Safety, exploitation at center of debate on college football ban
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/w ... t=hp_wr_a3
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/w ... t=hp_wr_a3
One of Bissinger's points particularly stood out, and it both energized the audience and rendered his opponents all but powerless to rebut it. He argued, essentially, that we put an end to the increasingly tortured efforts to reconcile the larger missions of universities with what it takes for those universities to field successful football teams, by officially recognizing that the two are not reconcilable. He proposed that major college football programs that are already, in practice, run parallel to their universities -- out of their own increasingly grand departments and facilities -- formally split off into their own entities while retaining a tie to, and even the name of, the school from which they originated. "Create a de facto subsidiary," Bissinger proposed. "The university gets a licensing fee."
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
-
BigSkyBears
- Level2

- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
- I am a fan of: Northern Colorado
Re: Ban college football?
Do you even have a college degree?Grizalltheway wrote:Hey, Mr Realist, why don't you take a look at where your little junior college falls in national rankings before you start talking academic smack?BigSkyBears wrote:
All I can say is that universities in Colorado have had to raise tuition because the tax payers won't support the universities with their tax dollars. Some, such as CU have suggesting transitioning into a private school.
As for article. I can understand his point of view. Some cultures are absolutely way too obsessed with football. Look at SEC's schools or Michigan or Ohio State. Look at some cultures on a smaller scale like Montana. It would be great if they were that obsessed over academics. However, I'm a realist so I understand that's not going to happen.

-
Vidav
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 10804
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Ban college football?
BigSkyBears wrote:Do you even have a college degree?Grizalltheway wrote: Hey, Mr Realist, why don't you take a look at where your little junior college falls in national rankings before you start talking academic smack?
Re: Ban college football?
Not sure FCS is all that much more sustainable. Yes, there are a few less scholarships to pay for, but there is still the arms race that is stadiums, facilities, coaches, etc. And unlike BCS schools, most FCS programs don't have millions of dollars in TV money to support them.bonarae wrote:I think the author has seen enough of the problems that plague FBS football. Interesting discussion though. But he doesn't mention at all the sustainable football programs at the FCS, D-II and D-III levels or other sports as well.
Of course, the worst situation is probably the lower-tier (non-BCS) FBS programs, that have much of the same costs of the BCS programs, but not nearly the same revenues.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Ban college football?
Yes. Now, did you have a chance to compare how our respective schools rank academically, or are you going to continue to make claims not at all based on reality?BigSkyBears wrote:Do you even have a college degree?Grizalltheway wrote: Hey, Mr Realist, why don't you take a look at where your little junior college falls in national rankings before you start talking academic smack?
-
BigSkyBears
- Level2

- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:31 pm
- I am a fan of: Northern Colorado
Re: Ban college football?
Congrats on the rankings. I can find a half dozen articles on how most of those rankings are bunk, too. UNC won't rank very high on those lists because we're not a major research university. We do well in teacher education, music, nursing and undergrad business. Our professors do research, but it's not their priority. Teaching is.Grizalltheway wrote:Yes. Now, did you have a chance to compare how our respective schools rank academically, or are you going to continue to make claims not at all based on reality?BigSkyBears wrote:
Do you even have a college degree?


