Climate Change - Science, Ideology or Money

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:36 am

YT makes a compelling case, his video's are narrated by a guy with an english accent. It must be the smarter one.

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:40 am

I think it's Bush's fault. It has to be. That's the only explanation that makes sense.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:43 am

andy7171 wrote:YT makes a compelling case, his video's are narrated by a guy with an english accent. It must be the smarter one.

I don't know about british guys being smart, but chicks with british accents are hot.

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:45 am

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote:YT makes a compelling case, his video's are narrated by a guy with an english accent. It must be the smarter one.
I don't know about british guys being smart, but chicks with british accents are hot.

/thread

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:48 am

andy7171 wrote:
kalm wrote:
I don't know about british guys being smart, but chicks with british accents are hot.
/thread

Fine work there Andy.

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:49 am

kalm wrote:
Holy shit, it's worse than I previously thought. Wikipedia is on the conspiracy too:

Now we can add Wikipedia to your list of "reliable" objective sources, right along beside Rolling Stone, thinkprogress, Salon.com, and huffpoop.

As is SourceWatch...

Sourcewatch is an arm of the Center for Media and Democracy, a self described "progressive" investigative reporting group. Since they are "progressive", I'm positive they don't have an agenda whatsoever.

Nice job, kalm.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:04 am

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
Holy shit, it's worse than I previously thought. Wikipedia is on the conspiracy too:
Now we can add Wikipedia to your list of "reliable" objective sources, right along beside Rolling Stone, thinkprogress, Salon.com, and huffpoop.

As is SourceWatch...
Sourcewatch is an arm of the Center for Media and Democracy, a self described "progressive" investigative reporting group. Since they are "progressive", I'm positive they don't have an agenda whatsoever.

Nice job, kalm.

Quiet you, Andy's teaching me Zen and the Art of Thread Hijacking.

Here let's try this again. Chicks with british accents are hot:

Sexiest actress alive.

Now...where were we...Oh yes. Irony...it passes you by.

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:15 am

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:17 am

andy7171 wrote:

Phew...Andy to the rescue again.

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:30 am

Abigail Clancy - british accent - your homework assignment for the day

[youtube][/youtube]

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:38 am

kalm wrote: Quiet you, Andy's teaching me Zen and the Art of Thread Hijacking.

You owe Andy a 12 pack for saving you from this thread.

Kate Winslet is nice, but hot British actresses pass you by.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:40 am

andy7171 wrote:Abigail Clancy - british accent - your homework assignment for the day

[youtube][/youtube]

She is a lovely creature.

Baldy, you still lose.

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:49 am

kalm wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Abigail Clancy - british accent - your homework assignment for the day

[youtube][/youtube]
She is a lovely creature.

Baldy, you still lose.

kalm, you keep pitching high and over the middle of the plate and I'll keep knocking them outta the park.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:04 am

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
She is a lovely creature.

Baldy, you still lose.
kalm, you keep pitching high and over the middle of the plate and I'll keep knocking them outta the park.

Keep using people like Zbigneiw Jaworski to halt threads.

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:35 am

That girl from Harry Potter= HAWT!!!!!

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:38 am

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote: kalm, you keep pitching high and over the middle of the plate and I'll keep knocking them outta the park.
Keep using people like Zbigneiw Jaworski to halt threads.

Why not? You're using "sources" like Wikipedia and SourceWatch.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:45 am

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
Keep using people like Zbigneiw Jaworski to halt threads.
Why not? You're using "sources" like Wikipedia and SourceWatch.

Except I didn't claim those sources ended the thread.

But go ahead. Please tells us how they're wrong. Or come up with someone who publishes in peer reviewed journals or who doesn't believe lead in drinking water is bad or who can't be exposed with his own words.

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:20 am

Ibanez wrote:That girl from Harry Potter= HAWT!!!!!

I concur, but Alice Eve makes my jeans get tight.

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:25 am

Alice Eve has a english accent?

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:27 am

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote: Why not? You're using "sources" like Wikipedia and SourceWatch.

Except I didn't claim those sources ended the thread.

But go ahead. Please tells us how they're wrong. Or come up with someone who publishes in peer reviewed journals or who doesn't believe lead in drinking water is bad or who can't be exposed with his own words.

What do you have against canada.com?

I'll come up with someone, as soon as you find any source who doesn't get their funding by sucking from the government teat or subscribe to some pie in the sky altruistic radical "progressive" ideology.

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:31 am

andy7171 wrote:Alice Eve has a english accent?

Hells yeah!!!

[youtube][/youtube]

Post by **andy7171** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:38 am

Post by **kalm** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:41 am

Baldy wrote:
kalm wrote:
Except I didn't claim those sources ended the thread.

But go ahead. Please tells us how they're wrong. Or come up with someone who publishes in peer reviewed journals or who doesn't believe lead in drinking water is bad or who can't be exposed with his own words.
What do you have against canada.com?

I'll come up with someone, as soon as you find any source who doesn't get their funding by sucking from the government teat or subscribe to some pie in the sky altruistic radical "progressive" ideology.

Hmmm, that's kind of a tough challenge as just like with oil and most new technologies, renewable energy is going to have all sorts of ties to the government. $'s drive most private research, not altruism or a clean environment. But none the less...

The Best Clean-Energy Startups

Say "energy company" to most people, and an oil giant such as ExxonMobil (XOM) or their local utility probably comes to mind. But in an explosion of innovation not unlike the dawn of the info-tech age, the green era is giving birth to a broad and bewildering array of new companies with big ambitions. If fact, many promising clean-energy startups are hitting the market with products and services that could radically alter how we think of, and consume, power.

All of this activity, of course, is in the thick of the worst U.S. recession in decades. That's because these adolescent companies are beneficiaries of the $96 billion in venture and private equity funding that gushed into green technology from 2002 through 2008, according to New Energy Finance. BusinessWeek and GreenBiz.com, a green business information service, teamed up to pick 25 of the most intriguing up-and-coming U.S. energy companies that you probably haven't heard of—yet. Our criteria: These picks are starting to gain traction with real, innovative products and services for sale, they are not yet publicly listed, they are not yet household names, and all have bona fide venture capital backing and other high-profile investors.

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/07 ... /index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

D1B · Post by **D1B** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:52 am

Baldy wrote:
D1B wrote:
Really, you know this shit?

You DO realize you live in one of the most polluted states, including a Top 10 most polluted, right? You do realize all your groundwater will be contaminated soon, right?

Georgia is a fucking cesspool. Nice work Baldy, PWNydick, and the rest of the GA conk brigade.

I'm sure you know-it-all's will be able to find at least one schlub scientist, working for the coal industry, that says otherwise.

Your own chart seems to say otherwise.

It looks like the baseline for the national average is set at 100. According to your chart, Georgia is well below the national average in every category except one.

...and I didn't need a 'schlub scientist' working for the coal industry to tell me that.

I'm gonna give you a pass on this one.

0=clean 100=most polluted

You're one of the worst. Top 9, MOF.

One would think you'd be a little more receptive to the green message, considering GA is so polluted.

Baldy · Post by **Baldy** » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:04 am

kalm wrote:
Baldy wrote: What do you have against canada.com?

I'll come up with someone, as soon as you find any source who doesn't get their funding by sucking from the government teat or subscribe to some pie in the sky altruistic radical "progressive" ideology.
Hmmm, that's kind of a tough challenge as just like with oil and most new technologies, renewable energy is going to have all sorts of ties to the government. $'s drive most private research, not altruism or a clean environment. But none the less...

The Best Clean-Energy Startups

Say "energy company" to most people, and an oil giant such as ExxonMobil (XOM) or their local utility probably comes to mind. But in an explosion of innovation not unlike the dawn of the info-tech age, the green era is giving birth to a broad and bewildering array of new companies with big ambitions. If fact, many promising clean-energy startups are hitting the market with products and services that could radically alter how we think of, and consume, power.

All of this activity, of course, is in the thick of the worst U.S. recession in decades. That's because these adolescent companies are beneficiaries of the $96 billion in venture and private equity funding that gushed into green technology from 2002 through 2008, according to New Energy Finance. BusinessWeek and GreenBiz.com, a green business information service, teamed up to pick 25 of the most intriguing up-and-coming U.S. energy companies that you probably haven't heard of—yet. Our criteria: These picks are starting to gain traction with real, innovative products and services for sale, they are not yet publicly listed, they are not yet household names, and all have bona fide venture capital backing and other high-profile investors.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/07 ... /index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Private equity and venture capitalist investment. Gotta love it. Yay for the 1%'ers

That's how it should be done, but I lol'd at Solyndra making the list.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums