Thread of the Month!!!!!
Good humor, outstanding political satire and I didn't even have to get involved!!!!

Spot on.89Hen wrote:That's why you have to rely on voter fraud to win elections.D1B wrote:Our fucks don't vote, Isaac Nutbag.

So you agree that Libs have nothing to offer except "we're not X". Glad we agree on something.D1B wrote:Not really. My comment was more a shot at the "frauds" you put up for election. Donks win when they're running against the John McFuckups, Sarah Palins (Fraud), Romneys and Santorums of the world.


Appaholic wrote:As opposed to your "educated" voter base who can't figure out how punch a voter ballot so there's no hanging chads....nice try, but go climb back up to your government teet and latch on for another budget cycle...D1B wrote:
Savings?Uhhhh, not these conks, **** face. These conks are veterans and blue collar **** who rode unions and companies into the ground, got their buy out and pension ,and now they vote conk cuz a negroe is in office. They're your uneducated, brown shirt voter base. They're the **** who produce the Sarah Palins of the world.

The only reason D1B's still employed. If we ever demanded accountability of taxpayer funded social safety-net programs, D might would be forced to drag-race in the desert so he could beg for a job running TMan's marina near Auburn Dam....CID1990 wrote:Appaholic wrote:
As opposed to your "educated" voter base who can't figure out how punch a voter ballot so there's no hanging chads....nice try, but go climb back up to your government teet and latch on for another budget cycle...
Budget cycle? What?
More than 800 days since this government has passed a budget, and for a goodly portion of that time it was controlled by the Democrats, along with a Dem in the White House. That's the pinnacle of ineptitude.

Hey, FWIW, D's organization is 100% first class and highly impactful in his community. He's a major reason why. Couldn't see most of you Conks doing something like this.Appaholic wrote:The only reason D1B's still employed. If we ever demanded accountability of taxpayer funded social safety-net programs, D might would be forced to drag-race in the desert so he could beg for a job running TMan's marina near Auburn Dam....CID1990 wrote:
Budget cycle? What?
More than 800 days since this government has passed a budget, and for a goodly portion of that time it was controlled by the Democrats, along with a Dem in the White House. That's the pinnacle of ineptitude.
In some cases, yes, and thank god. Your party is a theocracy comprised of whackjobs and war mongers.89Hen wrote:So you agree that Libs have nothing to offer except "we're not X". Glad we agree on something.D1B wrote:Not really. My comment was more a shot at the "frauds" you put up for election. Donks win when they're running against the John McFuckups, Sarah Palins (Fraud), Romneys and Santorums of the world.
Sheeeit....Appaholic wrote:The only reason D1B's still employed. If we ever demanded accountability of taxpayer funded social safety-net programs, D might would be forced to drag-race in the desert so he could beg for a job running TMan's marina near Auburn Dam....CID1990 wrote:
Budget cycle? What?
More than 800 days since this government has passed a budget, and for a goodly portion of that time it was controlled by the Democrats, along with a Dem in the White House. That's the pinnacle of ineptitude.


As long as you fix your one statement... both parties are a theocracy comprised of whackjobs and war mongers or socialists.D1B wrote:In some cases, yes, and thank god. Your party is a theocracy comprised of whackjobs and war mongers.89Hen wrote: So you agree that Libs have nothing to offer except "we're not X". Glad we agree on something.
We need a viable third party. We can both agree on that.


see how easy that is....Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, FWIW, JJ's local diocese is 100% first class and highly impactful in his community. He's a major reason why. Couldn't see most of you Donks doing something like this.
Just saying'.
Joe perpetuates and supports the "LA LA LA LA LA, I can't heeeeeeear you!" and "No we didn't" strategy regarding his church's massive world wide child abuse scandal. Through his weekly offerings he also help pays the salaries of high priced lawyers and PR firms hired by the catholic church to threaten families and victims and avoid accountability by hiding behind legal technicalities. All done to great disservice to his church's victims and families.Appaholic wrote:see how easy that is....Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, FWIW, JJ's local diocese is 100% first class and highly impactful in his community. He's a major reason why. Couldn't see most of you Donks doing something like this.
Just saying'.
http://www.catholicdemocrats.org/news/2 ... cathol.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Only 21% of Catholics are either strongly or weakly affiliated as a
Republican. This is the lowest number of Catholic Republicans in a long
time, even going back before 2000 when Al Gore won the Catholic vote.
(23% R in ‘06) and (31% R in ‘04).
60% Catholics are D's to 36% Catholics are R's when leaners are
included.
Democrats have an edge of 8 million voter advantage among registered
voters who are Catholics. If Catholics stick to their current party
identification when voting for president, Barack Obama would have a
potential edge over John McCain among Catholics by more than 8 million
(18 million Democrats to 10 million Republicans)
Catholics are also going post-partisan.
19.5 million Catholics who are independents; 41% (pretty much double the
number of Catholic Republicans), A huge increase since 2004 (30%).
Two major issue shifts among Catholics during the Bush administration:
Catholics are more supportive of diplomacy over military overthrow of
governments and the wealthiest in our society should be paying their
fair share. (20 pt. and 13 pt. shifts). (also a small shift in favor
of support for immigrants)
Health Care for all and a Support for working Americans were the highest
issue area agreements among Catholics.
A staggering 78% of Catholics support Health Care for all: Regardless of
cost, the U.S. government should guarantee basic health care for all
citizens
And 82% support workers right to a living wage and the right to form a
Union.
Weekly attenders are still more likely to be Democrats than anything
else. Thirty-four percent of weekly Mass attending Catholics are
Democrats and an additional 19 percent are not affiliated with a party
but lean toward the Democrats (53 percent identifying or leaning as
Democrats). Twenty eight percent of weekly attenders are Republicans and
an additional 17 percent lean toward being a Republican (43 percent
identifying or leaning as Republicans). Thus, among Catholics attending
Mass once a week or more often, Democrats have a 10 percentage point
edge. Only 5 percent of weekly Mass attenders say they are independent,
apolitical, or identify with a third party. Catholics who attend Mass
less than weekly are even more likely to be a Democrat rather than a
Republican.

Numbers are probably a little off (not a shocker since they are from a partisan group), but yes more RC's are D. That's why it's always funny to me when people say my political beliefs are based on my religion.D1B wrote:catholicdemocrats.orgOnly 21% of Catholics are either strongly or weakly affiliated as a
Republican. This is the lowest number of Catholic Republicans in a long
time, even going back before 2000 when Al Gore won the Catholic vote.
(23% R in ‘06) and (31% R in ‘04).
60% Catholics are D's to 36% Catholics are R's when leaners are
included.
http://ncronline.org/news/catholics-ame ... ffiliationThe total number of Catholics in the U.S. House and Senate has now eclipsed all other religions, with 69 Democrats and 63 Republicans in the House, and 15 Democrats and 9 Republicans in the Senate in the current 112th Congress. Catholics have also been candidates for the presidency and vice presidency. In recent national elections, a majority of Catholics supported the re-election of President George W. Bush in 2004, and of President Barack Obama in 2008...
Overall, 57 percent of Catholics affiliate with the Democrats and 40 percent with the Republicans when those leaning toward one or the other party are included.

Whould you vote for a highly qualified fiscal conservative who was pro-choice.89Hen wrote:Numbers are probably a little off (not a shocker since they are from a partisan group), but yes more RC's are D. That's why it's always funny to me when people say my political beliefs are based on my religion.D1B wrote:
catholicdemocrats.org
http://ncronline.org/news/catholics-ame ... ffiliationThe total number of Catholics in the U.S. House and Senate has now eclipsed all other religions, with 69 Democrats and 63 Republicans in the House, and 15 Democrats and 9 Republicans in the Senate in the current 112th Congress. Catholics have also been candidates for the presidency and vice presidency. In recent national elections, a majority of Catholics supported the re-election of President George W. Bush in 2004, and of President Barack Obama in 2008...
Overall, 57 percent of Catholics affiliate with the Democrats and 40 percent with the Republicans when those leaning toward one or the other party are included.

I would PREFER a highly qualified fiscal conservative who is pro-choice.D1B wrote:Whould you vote for a highly qualified fiscal conservative who was pro-choice.


Hillary?AZGrizFan wrote:I would PREFER a highly qualified fiscal conservative who is pro-choice.D1B wrote:Whould you vote for a highly qualified fiscal conservative who was pro-choice.

Read it again, Wedgie. The Hildabeast is no fiscal conservative.Wedgebuster wrote:Hillary?AZGrizFan wrote:
I would PREFER a highly qualified fiscal conservative who is pro-choice.
Good to hear. Glad Cap'n and I had a hand in your development.89Hen wrote:Yes. I'm not a single issue voter.D1B wrote:Whould you vote for a highly qualified fiscal conservative who was pro-choice.
Good to hear. Glad Cap'n and I hand a hand in your development.AZGrizFan wrote:I would PREFER a highly qualified fiscal conservative who is pro-choice.D1B wrote:Whould you vote for a highly qualified fiscal conservative who was pro-choice.

Wedgebuster wrote:Hillary?AZGrizFan wrote:
I would PREFER a highly qualified fiscal conservative who is pro-choice.
