The graph that seals the deal?

Political discussions
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: The graph that seals the deal?

Post by Seahawks08 »

And if McCain was prez, there would be NO tea party and the dems would still have control of both the house and senate. So much for that larger budget cut. I like this game! :thumb:
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31516
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: The graph that seals the deal?

Post by Gil Dobie »

BDKJMU wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:If there is nobody better than Obama, maybe he should get re-elected. I doubt McCain would have done better. The problem is the best people to govern the country don't get to the finals for each of the major parties.
If it was McCain instead:
- Wouldn’t have had Obama’s 862 billion porkulous plan.

- Wouldn’t have had massive 24% increase in discretionary, non defense/homeland security spending in the 1st 2 Obama budgets FY 09’ (that didn’t pass until Obama was in office) and FY 10’.
http://www.cagw.org/newsroom/waste-watc ... ional.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

-Wouldn’t have had Obamacare

-Would have had a larger budget cut that got last Spring. Remember the budget battle that almost led to a govt shutdown. Republicans had been elected on a pledge to cut discretionary non defense spending to 08’ levels, starting with a 100 million cut in the FY 11 budget that got passed over 6 months late last April. Obama and the donks dug their heels in on any cuts. They ended up cutting only 38 billion- a little over 1% of a 3.6 trillion budget.

So bottom line is would have had large budget deficts under MCain, but not 1.4-1.8 trillion. The national debt increased 4.9 billion under Bush in 8 years. Its increased 4.6 billion under Obama in 3 years. If it had been McCain in office national debt wouldn’t have exploded as fast.

-Likely wouldn’t have had a lib nominated & confirmed to the SCOTUS.

-Wouldn’t have had Dodd-Frank, at least not in its current form.

-Would have had approval of the Keystone Pipeline.

And that’s just for starters. I’m sure others could add more..
You have some good points, but the I'm not sold on McCain having a lower debt.
Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: The graph that seals the deal?

Post by Baldy »

Skjellyfetti wrote:Enter Baldy to argue that a drop from 6% growth to 5% growth is a recession. :lol:
Not at all. These people don't need me to show them how ignorant you are.

Just keep posting.... :lol:
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36401
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: The graph that seals the deal?

Post by BDKJMU »

Gil Dobie wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
If it was McCain instead:
- Wouldn’t have had Obama’s 862 billion porkulous plan.

- Wouldn’t have had massive 24% increase in discretionary, non defense/homeland security spending in the 1st 2 Obama budgets FY 09’ (that didn’t pass until Obama was in office) and FY 10’.
http://www.cagw.org/newsroom/waste-watc ... ional.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

-Wouldn’t have had Obamacare

-Would have had a larger budget cut that got last Spring. Remember the budget battle that almost led to a govt shutdown. Republicans had been elected on a pledge to cut discretionary non defense spending to 08’ levels, starting with a 100 million cut in the FY 11 budget that got passed over 6 months late last April. Obama and the donks dug their heels in on any cuts. They ended up cutting only 38 billion- a little over 1% of a 3.6 trillion budget.

So bottom line is would have had large budget deficts under MCain, but not 1.4-1.8 trillion. The national debt increased 4.9 billion under Bush in 8 years. Its increased 4.6 billion under Obama in 3 years. If it had been McCain in office national debt wouldn’t have exploded as fast.

-Likely wouldn’t have had a lib nominated & confirmed to the SCOTUS.

-Wouldn’t have had Dodd-Frank, at least not in its current form.

-Would have had approval of the Keystone Pipeline.

And that’s just for starters. I’m sure others could add more..
You have some good points, but the I'm not sold on McCain having a lower debt.
I don't think McCain could have been as fiscally irresponsible as Barry.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
Post Reply