Let's Lock the Hitchens Thread

[JoltinJoe]

... it now has the appropriate number of posts for such a thread.

[∞∞∞]

It's also appropriate that it's D1B's post.

edit: but seriously, someone kill that fucking thread!

[JoltinJoe]

It's also appropriate that it's D1B's post.

[kalm]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and shit that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

[grizzaholic]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and shit that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

This.


Bunch of fuckheads before Kalm. Whining and moaning.

[Ivytalk]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.

[kalm]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.

Except my love for you.

[grizzaholic]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

Lock it because it's fucking boring. kalm, you and I will never agree on anything. Not even the direction of the sunrise.

It comes over the mountain. Does rise somewhere else for you?

[JoltinJoe]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

There is a joke here you seem to be missing ....

Look at the number of posts

[kalm]

Locking a thread for something other than personal threats, lawsuits, and **** that will get Chris and the site in trouble is a bad idea and against the spirit of cs.com. You don't have to read or respond.

There is a joke here you seem to be missing ....

Look at the number of posts

Damn, I was wondering if I missed something.

[Vidav]

I'm glad I could provide the starting post for such an epic thread.

[Vidav]

It's also appropriate that it's D1B's post.

edit: but seriously, someone kill that fucking thread!

You're welcome.

[Skjellyfetti]

What a bunch of whiny little bitches. Isn't this what everyone hated about AGS?

If you don't like it... ignore it like a fucking grown up.


I've definitely gotten more warnings from sensitive mods in the past year on here than AGS.

[Vidav]

What a bunch of little bitches. Isn't this what everyone bitched about on AGS?

If you don't like it... ignore it like a fucking grown up.

For the record I didn't lock it because people were upset or any such thing. It was because it was at 666 posts and multiple people, those actually contributing to it, asked for it.

I just thought it was funny.

[youngterrier]

What thread?

[Ivytalk]

I'm glad I could provide the starting post for such an epic thread.

And look who finished it!

[Vidav]

I'm glad I could provide the starting post for such an epic thread.

And look who finished it!

[AZGrizFan]

Runaway thread of the year candidate.

[Seahawks08]

best thread of the year candidate.

[Ivytalk]

Run-on thread of the year candidate.

FIFY!