I understand what you getting it is nearly impossible to compare the 2 teams, I've seen film on the 1984 cats when i played high school FB, mostly because 2 of the defensive stars, the Timmer brothers, are from my hometown. 1984's D was really stout all the time, the O had games where they struggled. But they got it done, and with a team that was 1-6 in conference play a year prior.catbooster wrote: Those two statements are immensely different. Someone can think this is not the most talented team ever in the Big Sky, but still not to be taken lightly. I haven't seen anyone say that the Bobcats aren't the best team in the Big Sky right now, or that they can be taken lightly.
I suspect you'd get some debate on BobcatNation whether this is the most talented team ever out of MSU, let alone posting that it's one of the best ever out of the Big Sky on this board.
There's just no way to prove your opinion. I wasn't there for the '56 or '76 teams so I don't feel qualified to offer an opinion on those. I was there for the '84 team and I'd have a hard time deciding which is more talented. Different types of talent shine in different offensive/defensive schemes, etc.
Despite all that, I generally agree with you that this is a remarkable team. The recruiting has been great in recent years; we have a chance to be among the top teams, if not dominant, in the Big Sky for the next few years or beyond and so on. I'm having a great time rooting for my Bobcats this year.
One thing i tried to stray from in that post was that this team is better than 1984, until they win the big one this is false. but raw talent which I realize doesn't win football games, i still think is better and does actually give us a shot to play with anyone in the FCS.







