Who gives the most in America conservatives or liberals?

[D1B]

What are you waiting for? I've always maintained conservatives give more, you dumb, fat fuck.

Now be a good donor and pay the legals bills for your serial rapists, child abusers and pedophiles who run your religion.

You're just pissed Coburn is onto your schtick.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... dult-baby/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A key senator has asked the Social Security Administration to investigate how people who live their lives role-playing as “adult babies” are able to get taxpayer-funded disability payments — after one of them was featured on a recent reality TV episode wearing diapers, feeding from a bottle and using an adult-sized crib he built.

Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican and the Senate’s top waste-watcher, asked the agency’s inspector general to look into 30-year-old Stanley Thornton Jr. and his roommate, Sandra Dias, who acts as his “mother,” saying it’s not clear why they are collecting Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits instead of working.

“Given that Mr. Thornton is able to determine what is appropriate attire and actions in public, drive himself to complete errands, design and custom-make baby furniture to support a 350-pound adult and run an Internet support group, it is possible that he has been improperly collecting disability benefits for a period of time,” Mr. Coburn wrote in a letter Monday to Inspector General Patrick P. O'Carroll Jr.

Why are you here?

[D1B]

And he doesn't disappoint.

Just be a good donor Hen and pay your pedophiles.

[D1B]

Waiting for DB1.

I'm guessing he'll attack the source on this one.

Nope, that would be Pedophile Protector Joe.

Oh, SNAP!

[D1B]

I'm guessing he'll attack the source on this one.

And he will call LeadBolt a liar.

No, Leadbolt's source is reasonable. You on the other hand use whackjob christian sites like TKOH.

Welcome to: The Kingdom of Hearts, Organization-Family-The Body Of Christ in action:

What we do is help believers be successful in what each person is called to do;

Helping believers find their purpose and authority,

Provide consulting and support services,

Provide training, certification and educational programs in each of the different callings.

Provide brochures, ads, templates, brochures, teaching materials,

Web hosting packages for Social Networks and Standard Hosting for Churches & Ministries

Publishing & Printing solutions for authors, churches and ministries

Help people in the body of Christ increase income with various methods

Connect the body of Christ globally so we can stand together with each other in agreement.

The reason we do this is because we need mercy. In order to get mercy from God, we need to give mercy. In order to receive, we must give. If we sow love, we get love in return and the planet again becomes a place that is decent to live on. We desire to fix things, because of our love for God, but also our children, because they inherit what we leave behind.

The Kingdom of Hearts (tkoh) is about the condition of our hearts to either end starvation, reduce homelessness and reduce drug and alcohol abuse and even reduce crime or allow it to continue. It is a choice to either stand and help or not, but each of us will have to stand in front of God. It is about a changed heart to work together to solve the needs and problems. The only way for human rights to work is through God. There is no other long term solution.

[D1B]

Or call the people that give to their chuch sheep or funding pedophiles.

Uhhhh, dumbass you are funding pedophiles if you give money to the catholic church.

[kalm]

Kind of old news. I think it's been documented for a long time that conservatives, on average, give more to charity than liberals do. And that's the case even when you take out the charitable giving to their churches.

But I think part of that is that liberals think that government should take care of things. The support government "charity."

The main thing is that when conservatives say that certain government programs should be eliminated, curtailed, reduced, etc., it does not mean they are selfish or do not want to help their fellow man (or woman). It just means they don't think government should be doing it.

And that's the position I've always had. Charity should be a private, voluntary matter. Government should not be compelling charity by taking money from some in the form of taxes and giving it to others. To pre-empt: If you say they shouldn't give money to corporations and such I agree with that. But two things about that. One is that a tax break is not "giving" somebody something. It's opting not to take what they already have. The second is that government gives a whole lot more to the poor, the elderly, etc. over time than it does to corporations.

I won't dispute the findings. In fact, one of the most rabid, right wing, nut job friends I have also happens to be the most generous. Although I do see a tendency among my lib friends to be more willing to roll up their sleeves and volunteer.

But in regards to JSO's comments above, I wonder about the history of government charity. Why did they start doing it in the first place?

[LeadBolt]

Perhaps you missed this in the article:

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half.

It would seem that more conservatives are literally rolling up their sleeves to donate non-monetary life saving items like blood than liberals. Kudos to your liberal friends if they are different from most liberals in exercising individual responsibility and not depending upon the gub'mint.

Also when I volunteer with my church to to into Atlanta to take food and clothing to the homeless living under the bridges, take food and clothes to shelters or bring them to our church on cold nights, the conservatives seem to out weigh the liberals considerably.

[JoltinJoe]

Is Atheism a Genetic Defect

And just it may be that atheists don’t get it because they are physically incapable of doing so. In fact, it’s beginning to look like it may be the atheists who are defective, not the religionists.



As atheism is caused by a brain defect, it is likely that as we evolve, atheism will be rooted out by the process of natural selection. This probably explains why only 1.6% of the population are atheists today, representing a significant drop from past years. It also explains why we live in a post-atheist world.

[kalm]

Perhaps you missed this in the article:

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half.

It would seem that more conservatives are literally rolling up their sleeves to donate non-monetary life saving items like blood than liberals. Kudos to your liberal friends if they are different from most liberals in exercising individual responsibility and not depending upon the gub'mint.

Also when I volunteer with my church to to into Atlanta to take food and clothing to the homeless living under the bridges, take food and clothes to shelters or bring them to our church on cold nights, the conservatives seem to out weigh the liberals considerably.

Way to walk the walk LB

[D1B]

Is Atheism a Genetic Defect

And just it may be that atheists don’t get it because they are physically incapable of doing so. In fact, it’s beginning to look like it may be the atheists who are defective, not the religionists.



As atheism is caused by a brain defect, it is likely that as we evolve, atheism will be rooted out by the process of natural selection. This probably explains why only 1.6% of the population are atheists today, representing a significant drop from past years. It also explains why we live in a post-atheist world.

Joe, how's the dwarfism defect working out for you? Being a midget must suck.

[rebla 49er]

And just it may be that atheists don’t get it because they are physically incapable of doing so. In fact, it’s beginning to look like it may be the atheists who are defective, not the religionists.

Authored by:

[JoltinJoe]

Is Atheism a Genetic Defect

And just it may be that atheists don’t get it because they are physically incapable of doing so. In fact, it’s beginning to look like it may be the atheists who are defective, not the religionists.



As atheism is caused by a brain defect, it is likely that as we evolve, atheism will be rooted out by the process of natural selection. This probably explains why only 1.6% of the population are atheists today, representing a significant drop from past years. It also explains why we live in a post-atheist world.

Joe, how's the dwarfism defect working out for you? Being a midget must suck.

Aww, you get to call everyone a dwarf because you are a non-evolved, over-sized and plus-sized ex-lineman (with a brain defect to boot).

[D1B]

Joe, how's the dwarfism defect working out for you? Being a midget must suck.

Aww, you get to call everyone a dwarf because you are a non-evolved, over-sized and plus-sized ex-lineman (with a brain defect to boot).

At least I don't believe in ghosts, super-friends in the sky, talking plants and animals and worship a genocidal maniac. I also don't give money to organizations who coddle and protect pedophiles. I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.


Joe, you're a sick fuck indeed. And a midget.

[andy7171]

Aww, you get to call everyone a dwarf because you are a non-evolved, over-sized and plus-sized ex-lineman (with a brain defect to boot).

At least I don't believe in ghosts, super-friends in the sky, talking plants and animals and worship a genocidal maniac. I also don't give money to organizations who coddle and protect pedophiles. I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.


Joe, you're a sick fuck indeed. And a midget.

But he was peaceful and forgiving unlike those asshole athiest zombies you see in the Ressurection Evil movies.

[JoltinJoe]

Aww, you get to call everyone a dwarf because you are a non-evolved, over-sized and plus-sized ex-lineman (with a brain defect to boot).

At least I don't believe in ghosts, super-friends in the sky, talking plants and animals and worship a genocidal maniac. I also don't give money to organizations who coddle and protect pedophiles. I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.


Joe, you're a sick **** indeed. And a midget.

The reason the non-evolved atheist brain is defective, when compared to the more evolved brain of the believer, is that the atheist remains closer to the non-evolved primate.

The lowers primates, not being created in the image and likeness of God, have never evolved to the point of having the larger and more complex brain capacity necessary to comprehend the higher end disciplines, such as metaphysics, which deal with the nature of man and his relationship with that being with which man shares his image and likeness. The atheist is part man (in that he resmbles man), and part lower primate -- an interesting link or step in the evolutionary process from primate to the highly evolved species we know today.

[JohnStOnge]

But in regards to JSO's comments above, I wonder about the history of government charity. Why did they start doing it in the first place?

To buy votes. I think it comes down to something as simple as that.

[JohnStOnge]

I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.

D, all other things aside, the character of the risen Jesus, whether you think it is real or not, is not a zombie. A zombie...and let's leave aside the fact of what actually exists and what doesn't...is a dead body animated by an evil spirit that has no will. The concept of the character of the risen Christ is not the same thing at all.

Really. This thing of referring to the Jesus character as a "zombie" seems to have become chique. But it's just not cogent.

[kalm]

I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.

D, all other things aside, the character of the risen Jesus, whether you think it is real or not, is not a zombie. A zombie...and let's leave aside the fact of what actually exists and what doesn't...is a dead body animated by an evil spirit that has no will. The concept of the character of the risen Christ is not the same thing at all.

Really. This thing of referring to the Jesus character as a "zombie" seems to have become chique. But it's just not cogent.

I thought zombies were infectious desease riddled living beings that could be killed.

[D1B]

At least I don't believe in ghosts, super-friends in the sky, talking plants and animals and worship a genocidal maniac. I also don't give money to organizations who coddle and protect pedophiles. I also don't force my kids into cults and make them drink the blood and eat the flesh of a 2,000 year old zombie.


Joe, you're a sick **** indeed. And a midget.

The reason the non-evolved atheist brain is defective, when compared to the more evolved brain of the believer, is that the atheist remains closer to the non-evolved primate.

The lowers primates, not being created in the image and likeness of God, have never evolved to the point of having the larger and more complex brain capacity necessary to comprehend the higher end disciplines, such as metaphysics, which deal with the nature of man and his relationship with that being with which man shares his image and likeness. The atheist is part man (in that he resmbles man), and part lower primate -- an interesting link or step in the evolutionary process from primate to the highly evolved species we know today.

Joe, you forced your children into a cult where the leaders are comprised of automatons who hide and protect criminals and pedophiles who primarily favor boys about the same age as yours.

Nice work Joe.

[JMU DJ]

Perhaps you missed this in the article:

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half.

It would seem that more conservatives are literally rolling up their sleeves to donate non-monetary life saving items like blood than liberals. Kudos to your liberal friends if they are different from most liberals in exercising individual responsibility and not depending upon the gub'mint.

Also when I volunteer with my church to to into Atlanta to take food and clothing to the homeless living under the bridges, take food and clothes to shelters or bring them to our church on cold nights, the conservatives seem to out weigh the liberals considerably.

This information is a bit misleading. You see, according to the conservative researchers of this fine board as well as other internetz conservative memes, Three Quarters of the liberal voting base are disqualified from donating blood as the blood banks don't take blood from people who have drugs in their systems, are riddled with STD's or are a members of the homosexual community.

The preceding statements have been fact checked and are 100% correct 69.3% of the time.

[LeadBolt]

Perhaps you missed this in the article:

These differences go beyond money. Take blood donations, for example. In 2002, conservative Americans were more likely to donate blood each year, and did so more often, than liberals. People who said they were “conservative” or “extremely conservative” made up less than one-fifth of the population, but donated more than a quarter of the blood. To put this in perspective, if political liberals and moderates gave blood like conservatives do, the blood supply in the United States would surge by nearly half.

It would seem that more conservatives are literally rolling up their sleeves to donate non-monetary life saving items like blood than liberals. Kudos to your liberal friends if they are different from most liberals in exercising individual responsibility and not depending upon the gub'mint.

Also when I volunteer with my church to to into Atlanta to take food and clothing to the homeless living under the bridges, take food and clothes to shelters or bring them to our church on cold nights, the conservatives seem to out weigh the liberals considerably.

This information is a bit misleading. You see, according to the conservative researchers of this fine board as well as other internetz conservative memes, Three Quarters of the liberal voting base are disqualified from donating blood as the blood banks don't take blood from people who have drugs in their systems, are riddled with STD's or are a members of the homosexual community.

The preceding statements have been fact checked and are 100% correct 69.3% of the time.

Thanks, DJ! I completely overlooked your research earlier, but my statistical research shows that it is 83.25% correct, 83.25% of the time...

[JoltinJoe]

The reason the non-evolved atheist brain is defective, when compared to the more evolved brain of the believer, is that the atheist remains closer to the non-evolved primate.

The lowers primates, not being created in the image and likeness of God, have never evolved to the point of having the larger and more complex brain capacity necessary to comprehend the higher end disciplines, such as metaphysics, which deal with the nature of man and his relationship with that being with which man shares his image and likeness. The atheist is part man (in that he resmbles man), and part lower primate -- an interesting link or step in the evolutionary process from primate to the highly evolved species we know today.

Joe, you forced your children into a cult where the leaders are comprised of automatons who hide and protect criminals and pedophiles who primarily favor boys about the same age as yours.

Nice work Joe.

Yea, yea. I heard it all before. I'm a midget. I force my kids into a cult.

Bro, what has happened to you? You use to be funny. You use to be inspired. Here I am breaking out fresh new material, linking to some bogus article about atheists lacking brain capacity, calling you brain defective, and suggesting that atheists will go the way of the dinosaurs through natural selection -- an ironic use of Darwinism against you -- ... and you come back with the same tired schtick? In your glory days, you would have laughed and then come back with something creative and funny.

I now know how Dean Martin felt watching Jerry Lewis slouch toward humorless irrelevancy. Hey, like Martin, I'm breaking up the act. You're fired. I'm gonna hook up with someone who can hold up his end of the act, like Appaholic.

Thanks for the memories.

[D1B]

Joe, you forced your children into a cult where the leaders are comprised of automatons who hide and protect criminals and pedophiles who primarily favor boys about the same age as yours.

Nice work Joe.

Yea, yea. I heard it all before. I'm a midget. I force my kids into a cult.

Bro, what has happened to you? You use to be funny. You use to be inspired. Here I am breaking out fresh new material, linking to some bogus article about atheists lacking brain capacity, calling you brain defective, and suggesting that atheists will go the way of the dinosaurs through natural selection -- an ironic use of Darwinism against you -- ... and you come back with the same tired schtick? In your glory days, you would have laughed and then come back with something creative and funny.

I now know how Dean Martin felt watching Jerry Lewis slouch toward humorless irrelevancy. Hey, like Martin, I'm breaking up the act. You're fired. I'm gonna hook up with someone who can hold up his end of the act, like Appaholic.

Thanks for the memories.

Joe, what kind of father forces his children into a cult, knowing the leadership of said cult rapes boys?

You're insane, Joe.

[JohnStOnge]

My wife happened to be in a debate with a cooworker about this so I tried something that will help her. I Googled "conservatives more charitable than liberals." Then I Googled "liberals more charitable than conservatives."

Both times I got a bunch of hits on articles about how conservatives are more charitable than liberals. Well, I did see one thing when I Googled "liberals are more conservative than liberals" where a guy raised some questions but nothing where anybody claimed to have evidence that liberals give more than conservatives.

[BlueHen86]

My wife happened to be in a debate with a cooworker about this so I tried something that will help her. I Googled "conservatives more charitable than liberals." Then I Googled "liberals more charitable than conservatives."

Both times I got a bunch of hits on articles about how conservatives are more charitable than liberals. Well, I did see one thing when I Googled "liberals are more conservative than liberals" where a guy raised some questions but nothing where anybody claimed to have evidence that liberals give more than conservatives.

Well there you have it, it's official, Google has spoken.

What did wikipedia or the magic 8 ball have to say about the topic?

Next time just flip a coin.