Lib Logic

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:16 pm

dbackjon wrote:Weak

But true.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:20 am

If it was a registered 527 burning the flag, conks would defend the right.

Post by **AshevilleApp** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:23 am

SuperHornet wrote:

That's some stupid shit, even for you.

Post by **Wedgebuster** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:08 am

Casey, you need to get your hormones checked.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:05 am

Wedgebuster wrote:Casey, you need to get your hormones checked.

Post by **travelinman67** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:09 pm

kalm wrote:If it was a registered 527 burning the flag, conks would defend the right.

Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.

Post by **Appaholic** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:23 pm

travelinman67 wrote:
kalm wrote:If it was a registered 527 burning the flag, conks would defend the right.
Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.

...and uber-neo conks like yourself would demand laws to protect a piece of cloth representing this country yet balk at those same protections for the actual land this country inhabits....

Post by **travelinman67** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:47 pm

mini-D1B wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:
Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.
...and uber-neo conks like yourself would demand laws to protect a piece of cloth representing this country yet balk at those same protections for the actual land this country inhabits....

Post by **BlueHen86** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:05 pm

Appaholic wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:
Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.
...and uber-neo conks like yourself would demand laws to protect a piece of cloth representing this country yet balk at those same protections for the actual land this country inhabits....

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:51 pm

SuperHornet wrote:

I get what the post is saying, but it's based onthe extremists. Not the majority as a whole.

Post by **kalm** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:29 pm

travelinman67 wrote:
kalm wrote:If it was a registered 527 burning the flag, conks would defend the right.
Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.

Horse puckey!

Conks love freedom of speech as long as it pertains to groups of people and money!

You need to lighten up son.

Post by **grizzaholic** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:37 pm

travelinman67 wrote:
kalm wrote:If it was a registered 527 burning the flag, conks would defend the right.
Horseshit!

Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act deserves the loss of one kneecap for the remainder of their life.

A-N-Y P-E-R-S-O-N!!

Superhornet nailed this.

Libs are two faced, openly disingenuous, valueless cowards who refuse to live by the (so-called) "standards" they scheme to impose on others.

What do you do with your flag if it gets too weathered to be hung outside anymore? Or gets a rip in it?

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:43 pm

There's a HUGE difference between an honorable burning of a worn-out or damaged flag and burning one IN PUBLIC as a condemnation of the country. It's the difference between a funeral pyre and getting on the wrong side of Torquemada.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:46 pm

SuperHornet wrote:There's a HUGE difference between an honorable burning of a worn-out or damaged flag and burning one IN PUBLIC as a condemnation of the country. It's the difference between a funeral pyre and getting on the wrong side of Torquemada.

Either way, it's an act of free speech, and tbags is advocating using IRA tactics as punishment.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:47 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:There's a HUGE difference between an honorable burning of a worn-out or damaged flag and burning one IN PUBLIC as a condemnation of the country. It's the difference between a funeral pyre and getting on the wrong side of Torquemada.

Either way, it's an act of free speech, and tbags is advocating using IRA tactics as punishment.

Post by **travelinman67** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:12 pm

grizzaholic wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:Any person burning the American flag in a hateful act...
What do you do with your flag if it gets too weathered to be hung outside anymore? Or gets a rip in it?

Destroying a worn out flag isn't a "...hateful act...".

Post by **travelinman67** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:21 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:There's a HUGE difference between an honorable burning of a worn-out or damaged flag and burning one IN PUBLIC as a condemnation of the country. It's the difference between a funeral pyre and getting on the wrong side of Torquemada.

Either way, it's an act of free speech, and tbags is advocating using IRA tactics as punishment.

Back on topic...

...the comparison is between a mentally deranged jackoff burning the American flag as a hateful act of anti-America revolt, and a child flying the American flag on the back of his bicycle, who's then threatened with expulsion from school if he continues to display the flag.

And, btw...kneecapping is more greaseball than IRA.

GrizFanStuckInUtah · Post by **GrizFanStuckInUtah** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:34 pm

While I really hate to say it is a protected act to burn the flag, I reserve my right to go to jail for giving said person a butt stroke to the groin for such acts.

Post by **kalm** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:29 pm

travelinman67 wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
Either way, it's an act of free speech, and tbags is advocating using IRA tactics as punishment.
Back on topic...

...the comparison is between a mentally deranged jackoff burning the American flag as a hateful act of anti-America revolt, and a child flying the American flag on the back of his bicycle, who's then threatened with expulsion from school if he continues to display the flag.

And, btw...kneecapping is more greaseball than IRA.

Wow, I like how you wrote the being expelled from school part. Projection much?

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:12 pm

kalm wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:
Back on topic...

...the comparison is between a mentally deranged jackoff burning the American flag as a hateful act of anti-America revolt, and a child flying the American flag on the back of his bicycle, who's then threatened with expulsion from school if he continues to display the flag.

And, btw...kneecapping is more greaseball than IRA.

Wow, I like how you wrote the being expelled from school part. Projection much?

Was this lame cartoon based on an actual occurrence? I must have missed it if it is.

Post by **travelinman67** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:54 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
kalm wrote:

Wow, I like how you wrote the being expelled from school part. Projection much?
Was this lame cartoon based on an actual occurrence? I must have missed it if it is.

http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktx ... .htmlstory

Lame cartoon, based on lame liberal reality.

BTW, Kalm...I watched the original news interview with the Principal who stated (paraphrasing), "...we have rules...and students who cannot abide by the rules will be disciplined and expelled if necessary."

Within 24 hours, the Principal (along with the District Superintendent) publicly retracted that statement and allowed
the boy to fly the flag on his bicycle.

Gotta wonder...

...if the libs are so concerned about protecting the "right" to burn a flag, does that apply to ANY flag displayed on U.S. soil?

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:52 pm

T-man: I remember backlash somewhere here in Cali not too long ago against someone who wore red, white, and blue (or carried a flag, I forget which) on Cinco de Mayo.

Post by **Appaholic** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:13 pm

SuperHornet wrote:T-man: I remember backlash somewhere here in Cali not too long ago against someone who wore red, white, and blue (or carried a flag, I forget which) on Cinco de Mayo.

I remember that as well. I think he was wearing an American flag shirt to a predominately hispanic school on Cinco de Mayo.....which, while controversial like burning a flag, is well within his rights. The school was wrong for trying to discipline him while allowing hispanic students to wear clothing displaying the Mexican flag....you guys really live in a fokked up state....

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Lib Logic

Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic

Re: Lib Logic