SuperHornet wrote:
Not to mention that the whole notion is thrown on its ear by individual teams who transcend the level of their conference (like Gonzaga).
There is that factor of it....however, there aren't even a handful of teams that do that. Gonzaga, Butler.......and who else?
It's actually pretty easy to split them up into three categories.
High-Major:
BCS conferences (even though the SEC is relatively week)
Mid-Major:
MWC
CUSA
A10
CAA
MVC - last year was a terrible year for the league, and WSU still should have gotten an at-large but there is an anti "non big 6" push
there is an argument to be made for the Horizon as well.
Low-major:
The rest
There are a couple factors that go into the level. The BCS conferences are the high major for pretty obvious reasons. Most money, most fan support, most exposure, best teams, most tradition, etc...
The mid-major conferences are the conferences that have actually produced multiple S16 teams, or are conferences that actually get respect across the country. Most of the schools in theses conferences are better or just as good than the majority of the BCS teams. These are the teams that are hurt by the bracketbuster at this point, even though these are the teams it was designed to help. That is the reason teams like Gonzaga, and conferences like the MWC are pulling out of the bracketbuster. I'd love to see the MVC, CAA, and Horizon pull out of the BB and set up some sort of OOC scheduling set up. The MVC and MWC have a "challenge".
The low majors are the conferences that are one bid leagues every year, might pull an upset every once in a while, but the resources aren't there to compete at the top level all the time. The support isn't there top to bottom, etc...
Now, each conference does have teams that likely could play up, and down, in levels....there is always an exception to the rule.