The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36401
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by BDKJMU »

Image

"The Obama Presidency by the Numbers
The president constantly reminds us that he was dealt a difficult hand. But the evidence is overwhelming that he played it poorly.

When it comes to the economy, presidents, like quarterbacks, often get more credit or blame than they deserve. They inherit problems and policies that affect the economy well into their presidencies and beyond. Reagan inherited Carter's stagflation, George H.W. Bush twin financial crises (savings & loan and Third World debt), and their fixes certainly benefitted the Clinton economy.

President Obama inherited a deep recession and financial crisis resulting from problems that had been building for years. Those responsible include borrowers and lenders on Wall Street and Main Street, the Federal Reserve, regulatory agencies, ratings agencies, presidents and Congress.

Mr. Obama's successor will inherit his deficits and debt (i.e., pressure for higher taxes), inflation and dollar decline. But fairly or not, historians document what occurred on your watch and how you dealt with your in-box. Nearly three years since his election and more than two years since the economic recovery began, Mr. Obama has enacted myriad policies at great expense to American taxpayers and amid political rancor. An interim evaluation is in order.

And there's plenty to evaluate: an $825 billion stimulus package; the Public-Private Investment Partnership to buy toxic assets from the banks; "cash for clunkers"; the home-buyers credit; record spending and budget deficits and exploding debt; the auto bailouts; five versions of foreclosure relief; numerous lifelines to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; financial regulation and health-care reform; energy subsidies, mandates and moratoria; and constant demands for higher tax rates on "the rich" and businesses.

Consider the direct results of the Obama programs. A few have performed better than expected—e.g., the auto bailouts, although a rapid private bankruptcy was preferable and GM and Chrysler are not yet denationalized successes. But the failed stimulus bill cost an astounding $280,000 per job—over five times median pay—by the administration's inflated estimates of jobs "created or saved," and much more using more realistic estimates.

Cash for clunkers cost $3 billion, just to shift car sales forward a few months. The Public-Private Investment Partnership, despite cheap federal loans, generated 3% of the $1 trillion claimed, and toxic assets still hobble some financial institutions. The Dodd-Frank financial reform law institutionalized "too big to fail" amid greater concentration of banking assets and mortgages in Fannie and Freddie. The foreclosure relief program permanently modified only a small percentage of the four million mortgages the president promised. And even Mr. Obama now admits that the shovels weren't ready in all those "shovel-ready" stimulus projects......."..article goes on....
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... he+numbers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by AZGrizFan »

I'll save you some time, BDK: It's all Bush's fault. Obama can't rescue this country from 8 years of Bush fuckups in a week. It takes time...in fact it might take 3-4 terms.... :roll: :roll:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by bluehenbillk »

AZGrizFan wrote:I'll save you some time, BDK: It's all Bush's fault. Obama can't rescue this country from 8 years of Bush **** in a week. It takes time...in fact it might take 3-4 terms.... :roll: :roll:
I won't disagree that Obama was dealt a bad hand from W. However, he's been in office 3 years now, Americans expect to see progress, instead a majority of Americans see things going the wrong direction. Obama & Congress are to blame.

Campaign 469.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:I'll save you some time, BDK: It's all Bush's fault. Obama can't rescue this country from 8 years of Bush fuckups in a week. It takes time...in fact it might take 3-4 terms.... :roll: :roll:
Sorry to disappoint, but that article is a fairly decent account. Obama placed all his eggs in the Wall Street and FED basket with some window dressing stimulus measures to make him appear progressive.
Image
Image
Image
catamount man
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2608
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:17 pm

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by catamount man »

exactly kalm. I don't see how people paint him as a liberal. He is nowhere NEAR liberal. It is like Bush's 3rd term. Both men have been the worst Presidents ever elected. Seriously. Bill Clinton is a damn genius compared to these 2. Clinton and Newt agreed to play nice, catching the dot com wave and riding it and man oh man were the 90s awesome or what. Ever since 9/11/01, this nation has went to hell in a hand basket. Time to vote the babyboomers out to pasture FOREVER!
lakesbison
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1086
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:45 am
I am a fan of: NDSU
A.K.A.: lakesbison

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by lakesbison »

clinton ONLY had the Internet Revolution... and being a disgusting pervert
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by grizzaholic »

lakesbison wrote:clinton ONLY had the Internet Revolution... and being a disgusting pervert
Many would disagree with your latter comment.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
LeadBolt
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3586
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:44 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Botetourt

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by LeadBolt »

Serious question, for kalm and catamount man, what would Obama have done differently if he was in your view liberal (progressive, whatever term you prefer)?

How (in what ways) do you see Obama care as being conservative?

Is giving the economic stimulus out to state and local governments rather than building things conservative?

Is the % of people beholding to the government for assistance going up and the number of taxpayers going down conservative?

Was cash for clunkers conservative? How about the first time home buyers tax credit?

Is denying permits to drill for oil to make us energy independent in near term until green energy technology comes of age conservative?

Is proposing new spending programs at a time when budget cuts are mandated but not yet found conservative?

Is unilaterally raising fuel economy standards without any hope of compliance conservative?
catamount man
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2608
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:17 pm

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by catamount man »

He has lied about closing Gitmo.
He vowed to bring troops home immediately
He lied and said his term would be "no more Washington politics"
He has bailed out big businesses that needed to fail all at the expense of tax paying Americans
There were no shovel ready jobs as he proclaimed
states have already used up what federal stimulus money they were given

What he should have done from the get go was focus on how businesses can hire more by not adding regulations to their business practices but loosening them up and I'm not talking about Wall St, I'm talking about REAL jobs, he should have ran on a platform to repeal NAFTA, repeal the Fed, etc, but then again he's not running on a Libertarian point of view.

He's big government just like all republicans and democrats are. Bottom line, he lied to his voters about what he was gonna do and they bit it hook, line, and sinker. You cannot possibly tell me that the extreme left wing has been happy with his term.

We need candidates with enough balls to stand up to lobbyists and special interests, thank them for their opinion, but REFUSE to be led by them anymore and until THAT CHANGES, it doesn't matter who is in the White House.
User avatar
Bronco
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3055
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:12 pm
I am a fan of: Griz

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by Bronco »

Something else Obama inherited from Bush (along with a AAA S&P credit rating).
GENEVA (AP) — The U.S. has tumbled further down a global ranking of the world’s most competitive economies, landing at fifth place because of its huge deficits and declining public faith in government, a global economic group said Wednesday.

The announcement by the World Economic Forum was the latest bad news for the Obama administration, which has been struggling to boost the sinking U.S. economy and lower an unemployment rate of more than 9 percent.

Switzerland held onto the top spot for the third consecutive year in the annual ranking by the Geneva-based forum, which is best known for its exclusive meeting of luminaries in Davos, Switzerland, each January.

Singapore moved up to second place, bumping Sweden down to third. Finland moved up to fourth place, from seventh last year. The U.S. was in fourth place last year, after falling from No. 1 in 2008.

The rankings, which the forum has issued for more than three decades, are based on economic data and a survey of 15,000 business executives.
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen
Image
http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by andy7171 »

catamount man wrote:He has lied about closing Gitmo.
He vowed to bring troops home immediately
He lied and said his term would be "no more Washington politics"
He has bailed out big businesses that needed to fail all at the expense of tax paying Americans
There were no shovel ready jobs as he proclaimed
states have already used up what federal stimulus money they were given

What he should have done from the get go was focus on how businesses can hire more by not adding regulations to their business practices but loosening them up and I'm not talking about Wall St, I'm talking about REAL jobs, he should have ran on a platform to repeal NAFTA, repeal the Fed, etc, but then again he's not running on a Libertarian point of view.

He's big government just like all republicans and democrats are. Bottom line, he lied to his voters about what he was gonna do and they bit it hook, line, and sinker. You cannot possibly tell me that the extreme left wing has been happy with his term.

We need candidates with enough balls to stand up to lobbyists and special interests, thank them for their opinion, but REFUSE to be led by them anymore and until THAT CHANGES, it doesn't matter who is in the White House.
that makes him a liar not a conservative.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by Ivytalk »

Bronco wrote:Something else Obama inherited from Bush (along with a AAA S&P credit rating).
GENEVA (AP) — The U.S. has tumbled further down a global ranking of the world’s most competitive economies, landing at fifth place because of its huge deficits and declining public faith in government, a global economic group said Wednesday.

The announcement by the World Economic Forum was the latest bad news for the Obama administration, which has been struggling to boost the sinking U.S. economy and lower an unemployment rate of more than 9 percent.

Switzerland held onto the top spot for the third consecutive year in the annual ranking by the Geneva-based forum, which is best known for its exclusive meeting of luminaries in Davos, Switzerland, each January.

Singapore moved up to second place, bumping Sweden down to third. Finland moved up to fourth place, from seventh last year. The U.S. was in fourth place last year, after falling from No. 1 in 2008.

The rankings, which the forum has issued for more than three decades, are based on economic data and a survey of 15,000 business executives.
Meh, we're still ahead of the Krauts and the Red Chinese!
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

LeadBolt wrote:Serious question, for kalm and catamount man, what would Obama have done differently if he was in your view liberal (progressive, whatever term you prefer)?

How (in what ways) do you see Obama care as being conservative?

Is giving the economic stimulus out to state and local governments rather than building things conservative?

Is the % of people beholding to the government for assistance going up and the number of taxpayers going down conservative?

Was cash for clunkers conservative? How about the first time home buyers tax credit?

Is denying permits to drill for oil to make us energy independent in near term until green energy technology comes of age conservative?

Is proposing new spending programs at a time when budget cuts are mandated but not yet found conservative?

Is unilaterally raising fuel economy standards without any hope of compliance conservative?
I can make similar lists for "conservative" presidents like Reagan and Bush.

Obama also escalated wars, has deported way more illegal immigrants, condoned the security apparatus, protected Wall Street and big banks, and is in the hip pocket of big pharma and health insurance companies. Hardly liberal or progressive positions.

Obama is an opportunistic corporatist, aka a modern politician. I don't use the modern conk definition of progressive. To me, progressives were people like Teddy Roosesevlt and FDR who protected the rights and economic interests of the common man against entrenched power and monopoly.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
LeadBolt wrote:Serious question, for kalm and catamount man, what would Obama have done differently if he was in your view liberal (progressive, whatever term you prefer)?

How (in what ways) do you see Obama care as being conservative?

Is giving the economic stimulus out to state and local governments rather than building things conservative?

Is the % of people beholding to the government for assistance going up and the number of taxpayers going down conservative?

Was cash for clunkers conservative? How about the first time home buyers tax credit?

Is denying permits to drill for oil to make us energy independent in near term until green energy technology comes of age conservative?

Is proposing new spending programs at a time when budget cuts are mandated but not yet found conservative?

Is unilaterally raising fuel economy standards without any hope of compliance conservative?
I can make similar lists for "conservative" presidents like Reagan and Bush.

Obama also escalated wars, has deported way more illegal immigrants, condoned the security apparatus, protected Wall Street and big banks, and is in the hip pocket of big pharma and health insurance companies. Hardly liberal or progressive positions.

Obama is an opportunistic corporatist, aka a modern politician. I don't use the modern conk definition of progressive. To me, progressives were people like Teddy Roosesevlt and FDR who protected the rights and economic interests of the common man against entrenched power and monopoly.
Guys like that can NOT get elected now. :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
I can make similar lists for "conservative" presidents like Reagan and Bush.

Obama also escalated wars, has deported way more illegal immigrants, condoned the security apparatus, protected Wall Street and big banks, and is in the hip pocket of big pharma and health insurance companies. Hardly liberal or progressive positions.

Obama is an opportunistic corporatist, aka a modern politician. I don't use the modern conk definition of progressive. To me, progressives were people like Teddy Roosesevlt and FDR who protected the rights and economic interests of the common man against entrenched power and monopoly.
Guys like that can NOT get elected now. :coffee:
Agreed. And unless campaign finance is reformed we will continue to elect Obushma's.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Guys like that can NOT get elected now. :coffee:
Agreed. And unless campaign finance is reformed we will continue to elect Obushma's.
You know....it IS allowed to NOT believe the drivel coming out of these guys mouths. :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
Agreed. And unless campaign finance is reformed we will continue to elect Obushma's.
You know....it IS allowed to NOT believe the drivel coming out of these guys mouths. :coffee:
Oh I don't. I might be a bigger cynic than you. And I mean that as a compliment. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by Grizalltheway »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
I can make similar lists for "conservative" presidents like Reagan and Bush.

Obama also escalated wars, has deported way more illegal immigrants, condoned the security apparatus, protected Wall Street and big banks, and is in the hip pocket of big pharma and health insurance companies. Hardly liberal or progressive positions.

Obama is an opportunistic corporatist, aka a modern politician. I don't use the modern conk definition of progressive. To me, progressives were people like Teddy Roosesevlt and FDR who protected the rights and economic interests of the common man against entrenched power and monopoly.
Guys like that can NOT get elected now. :coffee:
Sad, but true. :ohno:
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Guys like that can NOT get elected now. :coffee:
Agreed. And unless campaign finance is reformed we will continue to elect Obushma's.

It never cease to amaze me that people think we will get " quality candidates" if only we had public financing of elections. Seems to me we'd get more hacks from the lunatic fringe on both sides. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Agreed. And unless campaign finance is reformed we will continue to elect Obushma's.

It never cease to amaze me that people think we will get " quality candidates" if only we had public financing of elections. Seems to me we'd get more hacks from the lunatic fringe on both sides. :coffee:
The key is not getting hacks who are as beholden to monied interests, be that unions or corporations. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by AZGrizFan »

kalm wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:

It never cease to amaze me that people think we will get " quality candidates" if only we had public financing of elections. Seems to me we'd get more hacks from the lunatic fringe on both sides. :coffee:
The key is not getting hacks who are as beholden to monied interests, be that unions or corporations. :coffee:
Gotta agree with Kalm here...The current campaign financing methodology hasn't prevented the hacks from the lunatic fringe (see Bachmann, Palin, Perry, Dean, etc) from running, has it?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
The key is not getting hacks who are as beholden to monied interests, be that unions or corporations. :coffee:
Gotta agree with Kalm here...The current campaign financing methodology hasn't prevented the hacks from the lunatic fringe (see Bachmann, Palin, Perry, Dean, etc) from running, has it?
Careful Z. You're moving dangerously close to mensa/jabber company. :mrgreen:
Image
Image
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:

It never cease to amaze me that people think we will get " quality candidates" if only we had public financing of elections. Seems to me we'd get more hacks from the lunatic fringe on both sides. :coffee:
The key is not getting hacks who are as beholden to monied interests, be that unions or corporations. :coffee:
But you still get hacks, and probably more parties with their hands out for public largesse, and we're no better off.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: The Obama Presidency By The Numbers

Post by travelinman67 »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
The key is not getting hacks who are as beholden to monied interests, be that unions or corporations. :coffee:
Gotta agree with Kalm here...The current campaign financing methodology hasn't prevented the hacks from the lunatic fringe (see Bachmann, Palin, Perry, Dean, etc) from running, has it?
It's all the same...just from different sources. With the Rep's it's from corporate, conservative retirees and ultra right wing extremists; with the Dems, it's from unions, dogma-donks, and hidden-agenda limousine liberals like Burkle, Lewis, Soros, etc..

Ivytalk is correct...the public mechanism just opens the door for every other lunatic too crazy to find normal financing.
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
Post Reply