New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Political discussions
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by ∞∞∞ »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote:SuperHornet, I don't doubt our founding fathers believed in God, but I do doubt they were all Christians. I think they were men that thought for themselves. Look at the stuff you just quoted me, not a single quote mentions Christianity or the Bible, only God/Creator which is as generic as it gets...and not a single quote is attributed to official documents of the United States of America. The most telling tale is clearly our Constitution, the supreme law of the land, which has no single mention of a God, Creator, divinity, Christ, Bible, or etc. These men were radicals of their time...free thinkers that were able to seperate Church and State when it came to building a nation. Hell, the whole concept of the seperation of Church and State are widely attributed to one of our founding fathers (Thomas Jefferson).

Also, read the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, particularly Article 11:

"...The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..."

You can't word it more directly if you tried. The treaty was created under George Washington's presidency but signed and ratifed under John Adam's. President John Adam himself read the whole document to Congress.

the phrase "separation of church and State" appear nowhere in the Constitution of the 'late united states'.
I said concept, so I FIFY:
citdog wrote:The concept of "separation of church and State" appears in the Constitution of the United States of America.
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by citdog »

∞∞∞ wrote:
citdog wrote:

the phrase "separation of church and State" appear nowhere in the Constitution of the 'late united states'.
I said concept, so I FIFY:
citdog wrote:The concept of "separation of church and State" appears in the Constitution of the United States of America.
where?
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: I said concept, so I FIFY:
where?

In the Establishment Clause you fucking retard. :ohno:

MOF, a group I support is very active and successful preserving the separation of church and state.
The Freedom From Religion Foundation, an educational, watchdog organization working to keep church and state separate, has had many significant legal accomplishments nationwide.

The Foundation has taken and won more challenges of the "faith-based initiative" than any other national group to date.

The national Foundation has brought more than 40 First Amendment lawsuits since 1977, and keeps several Establishment law challenges in the courts at all times.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has sounded the alarm bell on a multitude of other First Amendment violations. We act on countless violations of separation of state and church on behalf of our membership and the public, successfully correcting many violations through persuasion and education.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by ∞∞∞ »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: I said concept, so I FIFY:
where?
The 1st Amendment, and the fact that they didn't include any religious allusions in our most important government document after months of debating what should be in it. Thomas Jefferson later sent a famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Church quoting the Constitution and writing how the 1st Amendment is meant as a seperation of church and state. It can't get more direct than Jefferson himself; our founding fathers were VERY smart men.
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by citdog »

D1B wrote:
citdog wrote:
where?

In the Establishment Clause you fucking retard. :ohno:

MOF, a group I support is very active and successful preserving the separation of church and state.
The Freedom From Religion Foundation, an educational, watchdog organization working to keep church and state separate, has had many significant legal accomplishments nationwide.

The Foundation has taken and won more challenges of the "faith-based initiative" than any other national group to date.

The national Foundation has brought more than 40 First Amendment lawsuits since 1977, and keeps several Establishment law challenges in the courts at all times.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has sounded the alarm bell on a multitude of other First Amendment violations. We act on countless violations of separation of state and church on behalf of our membership and the public, successfully correcting many violations through persuasion and education.
we have freedom from religion but NOWHERE does it say ANYTHING about "separation of church and State". It merely says that we will have no official religion that one has to be a member of to hold office. if we had "separation of church and State" no minister, Rabbi, priest, muslim terrorist, or reverend could hold office.
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by citdog »

∞∞∞ wrote:
citdog wrote:
where?
The 1st Amendment, and the fact that they didn't include any religious allusions in our most important government document after months of debating what should be in it. Thomas Jefferson later sent a famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Church quoting the Constitution and writing how the 1st Amendment is meant as a seperation of church and state. It can't get more direct than Jefferson himself; our founding fathers were VERY smart men.


hmmm but when Mr. Jefferson's letters and statements on the nature of the relationship betwixt the States and the national government are brought out they mean nothing......
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by ∞∞∞ »

citdog wrote:we have freedom from religion but NOWHERE does it say ANYTHING about "separation of church and State". It merely says that we will have no official religion that one has to be a member of to hold office. if we had "separation of church and State" no minister, Rabbi, priest, muslim terrorist, or reverend could hold office.
That's a garbage argument that shows you have zero grasp of the concept. Thomas Jefferson clearly spelled out its meaning in the Danbury Baptist Church letter, and yet you're still trying to debate the meaning of the concept when one of the people who indirectly helped create the Constitution plainly stated it.
citdog wrote:hmmm but when Mr. Jefferson's letters and statements on the nature of the relationship betwixt the States and the national government are brought out they mean nothing......
When someone's argument becomes fallacious, they tend to change the subject...
Last edited by ∞∞∞ on Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

citdog wrote:
D1B wrote:

In the Establishment Clause you fucking retard. :ohno:

MOF, a group I support is very active and successful preserving the separation of church and state.
we have freedom from religion but NOWHERE does it say ANYTHING about "separation of church and State". It merely says that we will have no official religion that one has to be a member of to hold office. if we had "separation of church and State" no minister, Rabbi, priest, muslim terrorist, or reverend could hold office.
No shit it "doesn't say anything about separation", you schoolchild. :ohno: Separation of church and state is interpreted as the intent of the Establishment Clause.

Define separation however you want.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Back to the fvcking manatees, kids.

Image

That women is as big a khundt as Sarah Palin and everyone should run from the b*tch as fast as they can. Here's hoping the Sierra Club and PETA target her flabby ass in the next election.

:ohno:
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Back to the fvcking manatees, kids.

Image

That women is as big a khundt as Sarah Palin and everyone should run from the b*tch as fast as they can. Here's hoping the Sierra Club and PETA target her flabby ass in the next election.

:ohno:

Nice picture of you Cap'n! I see the Rogaine is working. :thumb:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by citdog »

∞∞∞ wrote:
citdog wrote:we have freedom from religion but NOWHERE does it say ANYTHING about "separation of church and State". It merely says that we will have no official religion that one has to be a member of to hold office. if we had "separation of church and State" no minister, Rabbi, priest, muslim terrorist, or reverend could hold office.
That's a garbage argument that shows you have zero grasp of the concept. Thomas Jefferson clearly spelled out its meaning in the Danbury Baptist Church letter, and yet you're still trying to debate the meaning of the concept when one of the people who indirectly helped create the Constitution plainly stated it.
citdog wrote:hmmm but when Mr. Jefferson's letters and statements on the nature of the relationship betwixt the States and the national government are brought out they mean nothing......
When someone's argument becomes fallacious, they tend to change the subject...
Obviously you are not familar with the concept of IF IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT.......IT DON'T FUCKING EXIST. IF THE GENTLEMEN WHO DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT WANTED TO MAKE WHAT YOU SAY EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING IN THE DOCUMENT.

WHY IS ONE LETTER FROM THE SAME MAN LESS VALUABLE THAN ANOTHER.........BECAUSE YOU AGREE? THAT'S A FUCKING GARBAGE ARGUMENT.....
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by ∞∞∞ »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: That's a garbage argument that shows you have zero grasp of the concept. Thomas Jefferson clearly spelled out its meaning in the Danbury Baptist Church letter, and yet you're still trying to debate the meaning of the concept when one of the people who indirectly helped create the Constitution plainly stated it.

When someone's argument becomes fallacious, they tend to change the subject...
Obviously you are not familar with the concept of IF IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT.......IT DON'T FUCKING EXIST. IF THE GENTLEMEN WHO DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT WANTED TO MAKE WHAT YOU SAY EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING IN THE DOCUMENT.

WHY IS ONE LETTER FROM THE SAME MAN LESS VALUABLE THAN ANOTHER.........BECAUSE YOU AGREE? THAT'S A FUCKING GARBAGE ARGUMENT.....
Because it's a CONCEPT. Holy shit citdog, do you really not understand what a CONCEPT is? The Bible says NOTHING about abortion, but the CONCEPT behind Christianity's opposition to it is based on the wording of the Bible. It's the same with the Constitution, and for a matter of fact, any text. If man wrote everything expressly, we wouldn't have some of the greatest literature of our time. Just because something isn't written expressly, it doesn't mean it's non-existent.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: That's a garbage argument that shows you have zero grasp of the concept. Thomas Jefferson clearly spelled out its meaning in the Danbury Baptist Church letter, and yet you're still trying to debate the meaning of the concept when one of the people who indirectly helped create the Constitution plainly stated it.

When someone's argument becomes fallacious, they tend to change the subject...
Obviously you are not familar with the concept of IF IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT.......IT DON'T FUCKING EXIST. IF THE GENTLEMEN WHO DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT WANTED TO MAKE WHAT YOU SAY EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING IN THE DOCUMENT.

WHY IS ONE LETTER FROM THE SAME MAN LESS VALUABLE THAN ANOTHER.........BECAUSE YOU AGREE? THAT'S A FUCKING GARBAGE ARGUMENT.....
Not true Citdog. They were politicians and needed the support of other politicians and the people.

They had to be very careful regarding how they worded shit.

Don't know about your second statement, but did that states shit make it into the Constitution?
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

∞∞∞ wrote:
citdog wrote:
Obviously you are not familar with the concept of IF IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT.......IT DON'T FUCKING EXIST. IF THE GENTLEMEN WHO DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT WANTED TO MAKE WHAT YOU SAY EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING IN THE DOCUMENT.

WHY IS ONE LETTER FROM THE SAME MAN LESS VALUABLE THAN ANOTHER.........BECAUSE YOU AGREE? THAT'S A FUCKING GARBAGE ARGUMENT.....
Because it's a CONCEPT. Holy shit citdog, do you really not understand what a CONCEPT is? The Bible says NOTHING about abortion, but the CONCEPT behind Christianity's opposition to it is based on the wording of the Bible. It's the same with the Constitution, and for a matter of fact, any text. If man wrote everything expressly, we wouldn't have some of the greatest literature of our time. Just because something isn't written expressly, it doesn't mean it's non-existent.
The bible also advocated infanticide, murder and abuse of children and ironically, abortion:
Abortion:

Hosea 9:11-16 Hosea prays for God’s intervention. “Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer. Give them, 0 Lord: what wilt thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. . .Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.” Clearly Hosea desires that the people of Ephraim can no longer have children. God of course obeys by making all their unborn children miscarry. Is not terminating a pregnancy unnaturally “abortion”?

Numbers 5:11-21 The description of a bizarre, brutal and abusive ritual to be performed on a wife SUSPECTED of adultery. This is considered to be an induced abortion to rid a woman of another man’s child.

Numbers 31:17 (Moses) “Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every women that hath known man by lying with him.” In other words: women that might be pregnant, which clearly is abortion for the fetus.

Hosea 13:16 God promises to dash to pieces the infants of Samaria and the “their women with child shall be ripped up”. Once again this god kills the unborn, including their pregnant mothers.

2 Kings 15:16 God allows the pregnant women of Tappuah (aka Tiphsah) to be “ripped open”. And the Christians have the audacity to say god is pro-life. How and the hell is it that Christians can read passages where God allows pregnant women to be murdered, yet still claim abortion is wrong?



Infanticide:

1 Samuel 15:3 God commands the death of helpless "suckling" infants. This literally means that the children god killed were still nursing.

Psalms 135:8 & 136:10 Here god is praised for slaughtering little babies.

Psalms 137:9 Here god commands that infants should be “dashed upon the rocks”.



The murdering of children:

Leviticus 20:9 “For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.”

Judges 11:30-40 Jephthah killed his young daughter (his only child) by burning her alive as a burnt sacrifice to the lord for he commanded it.

Psalms 137:8-9 Prayer/song of vengeance “0 daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.”

2 Kings 6:28-29 “And the king said unto her, What aileth thee? And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him today, and we will eat my son tomorrow. So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son.”

Deuteronomy 21:18-21 “If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.”

Judges 19:24-29 “Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day, and fell down at the door of the man’s house where her lord was, till it was light. And her lord rose up in the morning, and opened the doors of the house, and went out to go his way: and behold, the woman his concubine was fallen down at the door of the house, and her hands were upon the threshold. And he said unto her, Up, and let us be going. But none answered. Then the man took her up upon an ass, and the man rose up, and gat him unto his place. And when he was come into his house, he took a knife, and laid hold on his concubine, and divided her, together with her bones, into twelve pieces, and sent her into all the coasts of Israel.” To put it very bluntly this poor, young lady was murdered by her mate for being raped.

Exodus 12:29 God killed, intentionally, every first-born child of every family in Egypt, simply because he was upset at the Pharaoh. And god caused the Pharaoh’s actions in the first place. Since when is it appropriate to murder children for their ruler’s forced action?

Exodus 20:9-10 God commands death for cursing out ones parents Joshua 8 God commanded the deaths of 12,000 men, women, and children of Ai. They were all slain in the ambush that was planned by god.

2 Kings 2:23-24 The prophet Elisha, was being picked on by some young boys from the city because of his bald head. The prophet turned around and cursed them in the Lords name. Then, two female bears came out of the woods and killed forty-two of them. You would think that God could understand that sometimes the youthful make childish jokes. Calling someone “bald head” is far from being worthy of death.

Leviticus 26:30 “And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.”

1 Samuel 15:11-18 God repents of having made Saul king since Saul refused to carry out God’s commandments (i.e., Saul refused to murder all the innocent women and children.) At least god realizes what an immoral, murderous pig he is on this one.

I Kings 16:34 Laying the foundation for a city using your firstborn child and using your youngest son to set up the gates.

Isaiah 13:15-18 If God can find you, he will “thrust you through,” smash your children “to pieces” before your eyes, and rape your wife.

Jeremiah 11:22-23 God will kill the young men in war and starve their children to death.

Jeremiah 19:7-9 God will make parents eat their own children, and friends eat each other.

Lamentations 2:20-22 God gets angry and mercilessly torments and kills everyone, young and old. He even causes women to eat their children.



Child abuse:

Genesis 22:9 & 10 “And they came to the place which God had told him of and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood. And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.” It matters not that god let Abraham get out of murdering Isaac. To put a knife up to your son’s throat is child abuse.

I Kings 3:24-25 “And the king said, Bring me a sword. And they brought a sword before the king. And the king said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one, and half to the other." This test was of course given to see who the real mother of the child was. Christians view this king as a wise man. I look upon his suggestion with far more revulsion then I give accredit to Susan Smith.

Proverbs 13:24, 19:18, 22:15, 23:13-14 & 29:15 God commands repeatedly that you beat your children.

Matthew 19:29 If you really loved Jesus then he insists that you abandon your wife and children for him. Only that way will he allow you to go to heaven. (That is if you meet his other hefty requirements, don’t slip through the loopholes, and ignore the contradictions.)

Mark 7:9 Jesus criticizes the Jews for not killing their disobedient children according to Old Testament law.
God is not pro-life. :coffee:

Source = evilbible.com
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
citdog
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:48 pm
I am a fan of: THE Citadel
A.K.A.: Pres.Jefferson Davis
Location: C.S.A.

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by citdog »

∞∞∞ wrote:
citdog wrote:
Obviously you are not familar with the concept of IF IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT.......IT DON'T FUCKING EXIST. IF THE GENTLEMEN WHO DRAFTED THE DOCUMENT WANTED TO MAKE WHAT YOU SAY EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING IN THE DOCUMENT.

WHY IS ONE LETTER FROM THE SAME MAN LESS VALUABLE THAN ANOTHER.........BECAUSE YOU AGREE? THAT'S A FUCKING GARBAGE ARGUMENT.....
Because it's a CONCEPT. Holy shit citdog, do you really not understand what a CONCEPT is? The Bible says NOTHING about abortion, but the CONCEPT behind Christianity's opposition to it is based on the wording of the Bible. It's the same with the Constitution, and for a matter of fact, any text. If man wrote everything expressly, we wouldn't have some of the greatest literature of our time. Just because something isn't written expressly, it doesn't mean it's non-existent.
BULLSHIT. THIS "CONCEPT" IS TAKEN BY MOST OF THE IDIOTS OUT THERE TO BE SOMETHING EXPRESSLY WRITTEN IN THE DOCUMENT. BUT DON'T BELIEVE ME......ASK PEOPLE. THIS IS A DOCUMENT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS BASED UPON AND CLEARLY SPELLS OUT HOW TO MAKE IT SAY SOMETHING YOU WANT IT TO. AMEND IT.
"Duty is the sublimest word in the English Language"
"Save in defense of my native State I hope to never again draw my sword"
Genl Robert E. Lee
Confederate States of America
TwinTownBisonFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7704
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
I am a fan of: NDSU
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by TwinTownBisonFan »

citdog wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: Because it's a CONCEPT. Holy shit citdog, do you really not understand what a CONCEPT is? The Bible says NOTHING about abortion, but the CONCEPT behind Christianity's opposition to it is based on the wording of the Bible. It's the same with the Constitution, and for a matter of fact, any text. If man wrote everything expressly, we wouldn't have some of the greatest literature of our time. Just because something isn't written expressly, it doesn't mean it's non-existent.
BULLSHIT. THIS "CONCEPT" IS TAKEN BY MOST OF THE IDIOTS OUT THERE TO BE SOMETHING EXPRESSLY WRITTEN IN THE DOCUMENT. BUT DON'T BELIEVE ME......ASK PEOPLE. THIS IS A DOCUMENT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT IS BASED UPON AND CLEARLY SPELLS OUT HOW TO MAKE IT SAY SOMETHING YOU WANT IT TO. AMEND IT.
Except that it does. Expressly.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That's a two part sentence - the first part EXPRESSLY prohibits Congress for making any law that would establish a national religion. When combined with the 14th Amendment - and the supremacy clause - this means that STATES shall also make no law establishing a religion. Thus phrased, and combined with the second part of the sentence - prohibiting citizens right to freely exercise their religion - it creates a SEPARATION between the government and churches - both protecting religion from government and government from religion.

:ugeek:
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions

Image
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20857
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by SuperHornet »

Holy Out of Context, Batman!

:ohno:
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by BlueHen86 »

SuperHornet wrote:Holy Out of Context, Batman!

:ohno:
Who are you responding to? Your post is out of context. :lol:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by kalm »

Do you think God was pissed or flattered when TJ wrote his own version of the bible, sans the voodoo stuff?
Image
Image
Image
expandspanos
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:16 am
I am a fan of: School of Hard Knocks

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by expandspanos »

Tea party time:

[youtube][/youtube]
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20857
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by SuperHornet »

BlueHen86 wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:Holy Out of Context, Batman!

:ohno:
Who are you responding to? Your post is out of context. :lol:
Who else? D1B.

:ohno:
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by clenz »

SuperHornet wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Who are you responding to? Your post is out of context. :lol:
Who else? D1B.

:ohno:
Well there are probably 15 posters who have posted in this thread.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by D1B »

SuperHornet wrote:Holy Out of Context, Batman!

:ohno:
Fuck you, Jesus pussy. Dumbfuck, you don't even know youre in a fucking cult. Smfh.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by grizzaholic »

SuperHornet wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Who are you responding to? Your post is out of context. :lol:
Who else? D1B.

:ohno:
Why?
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
ODUsmitty
Level2
Level2
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:14 pm
I am a fan of: ODU
A.K.A.: ODUsmitty

Re: New Tea Party Target - Manatees!!!

Post by ODUsmitty »

Fuck manatees. I hope they choke on the old-style six-pack plastic rings that held your purchase together.

They remind me of the fat, 200lb plus societal tapeworms that you see at walmart buying more crap to stuff into their families' pieholes. You know the women, those that have given up and wear the "fat smock" because their tits, bellies, and asses are too fucking bloated to serve any useful purpose other than hold up a bag of tostitos during midnight shopping expeditions on the couch watching HSN.

Papa Smitty gave me two very valuable pieces of advice while growing up:
1. Never marry a woman that cannot pick her own crab.
2. If you cannot reach it to wash it, it cannot smell good.

While at it, if ICE would only conduct residency checks on Friday evenings at every Walmart in the US, the number of illegals would decline drastically, and the aroma surrounding these establishments would improve beyond the ubiquitous stench of third world lack of dental hygiene.

Image
When Maxine Waters reaches the pearly gates, I hope St. Peter bitch-slaps her with a large, wet teabag
Image
Post Reply