Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Post by GannonFan »

Uh oh - is this where party lines break down and we see all Americans come together to resist this??? :lol:

http://beta.news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak- ... 14236.html
Porn performers in California would be required to use condoms in sex scenes if draft rules from state workplace safety officials advance out of the proposal phase.
Cal/OSHA has said they always believed porn performers fall under the same section of state workplace safety law that requires nurses to wear protective gear to spare them exposure to blood-borne and fluid-borne illnesses, but the law has never been made specific to porn sets.

The AIDS advocacy group has called for the use of condoms in porn, saying that actors were in unsafe situations and they glamorized risky sex for audiences.

Vivid Entertainment founder Steven Hirsch has said that such moves could force filming to leave California, causing a blow to the multi-billion porn industry that has many operations in the San Fernando Valley.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Post by grizzaholic »

I think California has a few more important problems than this. And those fucks wonder why their state is falling apart and is broke??!! JFC
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Post by CitadelGrad »

A California legislator has recently introduced a bill into cmte. that would raise the minimum age for a porn performer from 18 to 25. It is reported to have bi-partisan support.

This is very bad news. Most of those girls live such drug and booze-addled lives that they look 35 when they reach 25. 18-20 is prime porn age.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Post by Pwns »

GannonFan wrote:Uh oh - is this where party lines break down and we see all Americans come together to resist this??? :lol:

On the contrary, GF. This is one of those issues where the PC left teams with the holier-than-thou religious right, and the voices of reason are few and far in between.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69206
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Nanny State sets sights on Porn

Post by kalm »

Pwns wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Uh oh - is this where party lines break down and we see all Americans come together to resist this??? :lol:

On the contrary, GF. This is one of those issues where the PC left teams with the holier-than-thou religious right, and the voices of reason are few and far in between.
Fuck 'em both. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply