So surely then, you also wouldn't want to limit a person's right to sue?
Should a business owner be held liable in regards to safety issues for customers or employees?
And if we live in a representative democracy why isn't this the governments business?
It should be none of government's business because the point was supposed to be Liberty. If someone, say, owns a hotel they should be able to offer certain accommodations. Then if someone doesn't consider the accommodations adequate they don't have to stay there.
So let's say you can't walk and use a wheelchair. Hotels should not be forced to give you a wheelchair ramp. They should certainly be free to do so if they want to attract people who need wheelchairs. But they shouldn't be
forced to. And if there are no hotels that have wheelchair ramps it should be up to
you to find a way to deal with it.
As for the right to sue: Yes, there should be a system that allows people to seek redress in non-criminal matters when they think they have a claim. But there is serious need of reform. First of all, the standard should not be "a preponderance of the evidence." It should be something more like "beyond a reasonable doubt." If you are going to say someone should pay you (for instance) millions of dollars because they were negligent, you should be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were negligent.
Another thing I think would help would be to say that if you file a suit then you lose, you are liable for the legal costs of the entity you sued. That right there would cut out a lot of the crap.