Palin's website had several districts "in crosshairs"

[Ursus A. Horribilis]

... It's good to see guys like TTBF and yourself (I think) and several others not having to resort to those kind of cheap shots. ....

Think again. Kalm is a master of the satirical cheap shot:

... right wing media is also defensive because there's an unfortunate coincidence between their rhetoric and what happened. ...

Kalm is just as complicit in the "bullsh!t" problem articulated by Roger Ailes as most of the lefties* here . He is just more clever and articulate than some of the other zombies.

* To their credit, ttbf and death dealer have been voices of reason from the left and exceptions to the rule on this issue.

No I think you are reading more into that on your own. He states pretty solid analysis there. It is likely that the right wing media feels a little defensive...driven primarily by the attacks but also a little bit by the unfortunate coincidence of the situation. He could have stated exactly like I just did but he has said that already elsewhere I had thought.

[SittingBull]

Think again. Kalm is a master of the satirical cheap shot:



Kalm is just as complicit in the "bullsh!t" problem articulated by Roger Ailes as most of the lefties* here . He is just more clever and articulate than some of the other zombies.

* To their credit, ttbf and death dealer have been voices of reason from the left and exceptions to the rule on this issue.

I'm walking a mile in conk shoes Nate. Right wing hate rhetoric has been stronger than ever and then a Democratic congresswoman gets taken out. I wouldn't feel responsible but I might lay low for awhile which is what Ailes is suggesting. It's called introspection. You should check it out sometime.

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, kalm. You haven't taken a single responsible step in a conk shoe on this thread. All you have done is contribute to the big lie and pour fuel on the fire.

You say that "...hate rhetoric has been stronger than ever and then a Democratic congresswoman gets taken out...." ??? Please - that's no better than Krugman, and you know it.

You are better than that. Straighten up and fly right.

[kalm]

Think again. Kalm is a master of the satirical cheap shot:



Kalm is just as complicit in the "bullsh!t" problem articulated by Roger Ailes as most of the lefties* here . He is just more clever and articulate than some of the other zombies.

* To their credit, ttbf and death dealer have been voices of reason from the left and exceptions to the rule on this issue.

No I think you are reading more into that on your own. He states pretty solid analysis there. It is likely that the right wing media feels a little defensive...driven primarily by the attacks but also a little bit by the unfortunate coincidence of the situation. He could have stated exactly like I just did but he has said that already elsewhere I had thought.

Yep. I think of Beck, Hannitty etc as Alpha. They're entertainers, provacateurs. I doubt they seriously wish ill on anyone. In fact, their sincerity is much less believable than Olbermann's.

[SittingBull]

Think again. Kalm is a master of the satirical cheap shot:



Kalm is just as complicit in the "bullsh!t" problem articulated by Roger Ailes as most of the lefties* here . He is just more clever and articulate than some of the other zombies.

* To their credit, ttbf and death dealer have been voices of reason from the left and exceptions to the rule on this issue.

No I think you are reading more into that on your own. He states pretty solid analysis there. It is likely that the right wing media feels a little defensive...driven primarily by the attacks but also a little bit by the unfortunate coincidence of the situation. He could have stated exactly like I just did but he has said that already elsewhere I had thought.

Roger Ailes has a good analysis but kalm does not. His last post about "coincidence" is not nearly as clever a sleight of hand as he thinks. It is direct, patently false, insulting - meant to intentionally fan the flames with a lie.

[kalm]

I'm walking a mile in conk shoes Nate. Right wing hate rhetoric has been stronger than ever and then a Democratic congresswoman gets taken out. I wouldn't feel responsible but I might lay low for awhile which is what Ailes is suggesting. It's called introspection. You should check it out sometime.

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, kalm. You haven't taken a single responsible step in a conk shoe on this thread. All you have done is contribute to the big lie and pour fuel on the fire.

You say that "...hate rhetoric has been stronger than ever and then a Democratic congresswoman gets taken out...." ??? Please - that's no better than Krugman, and you know it.

You are better than that. Straighten up and fly right.

I didn't say there's a correlation. Like I said, it's an unfortunate coincidence. So shut up before I go completely conkilisious on your ass.

(typing with only one arm)

[SittingBull]

Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, kalm. You haven't taken a single responsible step in a conk shoe on this thread. All you have done is contribute to the big lie and pour fuel on the fire.

You say that "...hate rhetoric has been stronger than ever and then a Democratic congresswoman gets taken out...." ??? Please - that's no better than Krugman, and you know it.

You are better than that. Straighten up and fly right.

I didn't say there's a correlation. Like I said, it's an unfortunate coincidence. So shut up before I go completely conkilisious on your ass.

(typing with only one arm)

A big green smile does not get you off the hook for telling a big lie and pouring fuel on the flames. Just what the hell is this "coincidence" that you are pulling out of your a**? Sarah Palin's map? ...when TWO Dem maps preceded hers? You see that's the BIG LIE. And now you are part of it, buddy.

[kalm]

No I think you are reading more into that on your own. He states pretty solid analysis there. It is likely that the right wing media feels a little defensive...driven primarily by the attacks but also a little bit by the unfortunate coincidence of the situation. He could have stated exactly like I just did but he has said that already elsewhere I had thought.

Roger Ailes has a good analysis but kalm does not. His last post about "coincidence" is not nearly as clever a sleight of hand as he thinks. It is direct, patently false, insulting - meant to intentionally fan the flames with a lie.

Ummmm OK. That's spooky. I swear sittingbull is not my alter ego account.

(Truth be told, that's a good guess, but I'm actually being fairly sincere with this thread)

[youngterrier]

I just want to call him ShittingBull one time.....

[Ursus A. Horribilis]

No I think you are reading more into that on your own. He states pretty solid analysis there. It is likely that the right wing media feels a little defensive...driven primarily by the attacks but also a little bit by the unfortunate coincidence of the situation. He could have stated exactly like I just did but he has said that already elsewhere I had thought.

Roger Ailes has a good analysis but kalm does not. His last post about "coincidence" is not nearly as clever a sleight of hand as he thinks. It is direct, patently false, insulting - meant to intentionally fan the flames with a lie.

Yeah, I get it you see it as something I don't. One thing I've noticed is that either side can read whatever they want into about any post even when it isn't necessary. Most people on here have a real easy time speaking exactly what is on their mind and kalm is in that group. So I'm gonna trust there wasn't any hidden message in there on that one.

Of course trying to point out or make something that isn't there out to be real seems like a good way to ratchet up that rhetoric we were talking about I guess.

[SittingBull]

Roger Ailes has a good analysis but kalm does not. His last post about "coincidence" is not nearly as clever a sleight of hand as he thinks. It is direct, patently false, insulting - meant to intentionally fan the flames with a lie.

Yeah, I get it you see it as something I don't. One thing I've noticed is that either side can read whatever they want into about any post even when it isn't necessary. Most people on here have a real easy time speaking exactly what is on their mind and kalm is in that group. So I'm gonna trust there wasn't any hidden message in there on that one.

Of course trying to point out or make something that isn't there out to be real seems like a good way to ratchet up that rhetoric we were talking about I guess.

TTBF and Death Dealer made a good case. Roger Ailes made a good case. Kalm did not.

[kalm]

I didn't say there's a correlation. Like I said, it's an unfortunate coincidence. So shut up before I go completely conkilisious on your ass.

(typing with only one arm)

A big green smile does not get you off the hook for telling a big lie and pouring fuel on the flames. Just what the hell is this "coincidence" that you are pulling out of your arse? Sarah Palin's map? ..when TWO Dem maps preceded hers? You see that's the BIG LIE. And now you are part of it, buddy.

It's not just the maps is it? The conk rhetoric has been very strong for a number of years. The donk rhetoric has been playing catch up. The conks speak more from a position of strength and aggression and they have more guns. Also, an unfortunate coincidence.

[kalm]

Yeah, I get it you see it as something I don't. One thing I've noticed is that either side can read whatever they want into about any post even when it isn't necessary. Most people on here have a real easy time speaking exactly what is on their mind and kalm is in that group. So I'm gonna trust there wasn't any hidden message in there on that one.

Of course trying to point out or make something that isn't there out to be real seems like a good way to ratchet up that rhetoric we were talking about I guess.

TTBF and Death Dealer made a good case. Roger Ailes made a good case. Kalm did not.

I agree they make a better case, they most often do. But I'm offended you like them more than me.

[SittingBull]

A big green smile does not get you off the hook for telling a big lie and pouring fuel on the flames. Just what the hell is this "coincidence" that you are pulling out of your arse? Sarah Palin's map? ..when TWO Dem maps preceded hers? You see that's the BIG LIE. And now you are part of it, buddy.

It's not just the maps is it? The conk rhetoric has been very strong for a number of years. The donk rhetoric has been playing catch up. The conks speak more from a position of strength and aggression and they have more guns. Also, an unfortunate coincidence.

Another big lie. "Donks playing catch" up when Bush was hung and burned in effigy and labeled by elected Dems as "Hitler" for eight years? ...when the DLC and DCCC bulls eye maps PRECEDED the Sarah Palin cross hairs map? Are you insane?

[kalm]

It's not just the maps is it? The conk rhetoric has been very strong for a number of years. The donk rhetoric has been playing catch up. The conks speak more from a position of strength and aggression and they have more guns. Also, an unfortunate coincidence.

Another big lie. Donks playing catch up when Bush was hung and burned in effigy and labeled by elected Dems as "Hitler?" Are you insane?

Fox News > Air America, Daily Kos, ThinkProgress, Truthout etc.

Btw, the school board member of which city labeled Bush Hitler?

[SittingBull]

Another big lie. Donks playing catch up when Bush was hung and burned in effigy and labeled by elected Dems as "Hitler?" Are you insane?

Fox News > Air America, Daily Kos, ThinkProgress, Truthout etc.

Btw, the school board member of which city called labeled Bush Hitler?

More than one correct answer.

[Ursus A. Horribilis]

Yeah, I get it you see it as something I don't. One thing I've noticed is that either side can read whatever they want into about any post even when it isn't necessary. Most people on here have a real easy time speaking exactly what is on their mind and kalm is in that group. So I'm gonna trust there wasn't any hidden message in there on that one.

Of course trying to point out or make something that isn't there out to be real seems like a good way to ratchet up that rhetoric we were talking about I guess.

TTBF and Death Dealer made a good case. Roger Ailes made a good case. Kalm did not.

Who said shit about whether kalm was making a good case or not? I don't fucking care that he's not making a case at all about it. A lot of dipshits are making a case that it was related...kalm is not making that case and doing it poorly in your opinion but still not trying to make it nonetheless.

If you feel like defending your team against a guy that isn't making the fight then what do I care.

[kalm]

Where's Native? He'd really like the new guy.

[SittingBull]

TTBF and Death Dealer made a good case. Roger Ailes made a good case. Kalm did not.

Who said **** about whether kalm was making a good case or not? I don't **** care that he's not making a case at all about it. A lot of dipshits are making a case that it was related...kalm is not making that case and doing it poorly in your opinion but still not trying to make it nonetheless.

If you feel like defending your team against a guy that isn't making the fight then what do I care.

If kalm is not making a political case then he should not have linked the "coincidence" at all. It's like asking, "when did you stop beating your wife."

Get it?

So kalm, when did you stop molesting children?

[SittingBull]

Where's Native? He'd really like the new guy.

I have read his posts and admire him a great deal.

But he's too fvcking weak.

[kalm]

Who said **** about whether kalm was making a good case or not? I don't **** care that he's not making a case at all about it. A lot of dipshits are making a case that it was related...kalm is not making that case and doing it poorly in your opinion but still not trying to make it nonetheless.

If you feel like defending your team against a guy that isn't making the fight then what do I care.

If kalm is not making a political case then he should not have linked the "coincidence" at all. It's like asking, "when did you stop beating your wife."

Get it?

No. But I do like molesting my wife.

[Grizalltheway]

Sure glad that native is gone, dude smelled like a used diaper filled with Indian food.

[Ursus A. Horribilis]

Who said **** about whether kalm was making a good case or not? I don't **** care that he's not making a case at all about it. A lot of dipshits are making a case that it was related...kalm is not making that case and doing it poorly in your opinion but still not trying to make it nonetheless.

If you feel like defending your team against a guy that isn't making the fight then what do I care.

If kalm is not making a political case then he should not have linked the "coincidence" at all. It's like asking, "when did you stop beating your wife."

Get it?

So kalm, when did you stop molesting children?

If you're trying to hang your hat on the term "unfortunate coincidence" then what the fuck ever. It's real weak but follow that path if you feel like it. If he is making a political case then show me where he is advocating that Palin is responsible in some way. Or maybe you are of the opinion that he is using some very subtle, hell almost subliminal way of getting people to think that this was the cause of the shooting.

I can't even begin to tell ya how weak that hook is. Stick with the minutia cuz it's looking real strong. Oh and the way you are bitching about rhetoric while trying to cultivate is good stuff.

[BDKJMU]

Agree...missed that quote to Sawyer. I have no problem with him commenting on the overall tone of our national discourse (but would rather he do his job & stfu). But, as a public official, I agree he crossed a line by directly assigning blame to a specific person...at least without assigning equal time to olberman, et al.

BTW, Limbaugh is just as disingenuous as Olberman (see his mocking "jive talk" when speaking about Obama on yesterday's show....have a little class you drug-addicted fat ass... )

The thing is this 75 yr old Democrat Sheriff Dipstick has gone on just about every network out there trumpeting his theory of how right wing rhetoric led to the shooting. He proceeded to get into a back and forth pissing contest with Limbaugh, which has become a sideshow of this tragic situation. One of AZ's major paper's has called him out on it:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... e1-11.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Earlier in the year Sheriff came out against AZ SB 1070, and then this media hound goes on Olbermann of all shows to call the legislators who enacted it racists.
http://www.breitbart.tv/vitriolic-flash ... ts-racist/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

VERY unprofessional of a Sheriff. He is no different than the rest of the libs out there trying to shamelessly exploit for political reasons this murder spree, taking away from keeping the focus on the victims and their murderer.

To follow up on Sheriff Dipstick:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... oting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[kalm]

The thing is this 75 yr old Democrat Sheriff Dipstick has gone on just about every network out there trumpeting his theory of how right wing rhetoric led to the shooting. He proceeded to get into a back and forth pissing contest with Limbaugh, which has become a sideshow of this tragic situation. One of AZ's major paper's has called him out on it:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... e1-11.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Earlier in the year Sheriff came out against AZ SB 1070, and then this media hound goes on Olbermann of all shows to call the legislators who enacted it racists.
http://www.breitbart.tv/vitriolic-flash ... ts-racist/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

VERY unprofessional of a Sheriff. He is no different than the rest of the libs out there trying to shamelessly exploit for political reasons this murder spree, taking away from keeping the focus on the victims and their murderer.

To follow up on Sheriff Dipstick:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... oting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Maybe he shouldn't go public with this stuff. That being said, I have a close relative who is an Under Sherriff of a county. He's about as conk as you can get, yet makes no bones about the trouble they've had with the local gun toting, anti-authority Constitution Party knuckleheads in his area. They're probably harmless, but still a pain in the ass to law enforcement, and it's important that they know they're being watched. If they weren't such assholes they would be left alone.

[houndawg]

The thing is this 75 yr old Democrat Sheriff Dipstick has gone on just about every network out there trumpeting his theory of how right wing rhetoric led to the shooting. He proceeded to get into a back and forth pissing contest with Limbaugh, which has become a sideshow of this tragic situation. One of AZ's major paper's has called him out on it:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... e1-11.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Earlier in the year Sheriff came out against AZ SB 1070, and then this media hound goes on Olbermann of all shows to call the legislators who enacted it racists.
http://www.breitbart.tv/vitriolic-flash ... ts-racist/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

VERY unprofessional of a Sheriff. He is no different than the rest of the libs out there trying to shamelessly exploit for political reasons this murder spree, taking away from keeping the focus on the victims and their murderer.

To follow up on Sheriff Dipstick:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... oting.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Between this guy and the other sheriff staging gun fights against non-existent drug couriers, wtf is it with sheriffs in Arizona?