89Hen wrote:IOW, they can lose with the best of them.dbackjon wrote:
They are a team that has improved each year...just can't get over the hump. Again, they are a good team, not a great team, but not a crappy team.
And they have won 6 this year...

89Hen wrote:IOW, they can lose with the best of them.dbackjon wrote:
They are a team that has improved each year...just can't get over the hump. Again, they are a good team, not a great team, but not a crappy team.

lolfail.dbackjon wrote:
I sent you a PM asking for your address, but you never responded, Che

Not if we played on SundayScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:SUU's QB (transfer from BYU) would put up at least 21 points and 300 yards against UD.



Skjellyfetti wrote:lolfail.dbackjon wrote:
I sent you a PM asking for your address, but you never responded, Che
I don't really care about the hat. But, I'll always bring it up when you bring up Appalachian being overrated compared to whatever Big Sky team has your fancy.

T-Dog wrote:The D2 game puts EWU at a disadvantage.
If App makes a good showing this weekend, they get at least a #2.
It's more like North Carolina saying they almost lost to a "solid" William and Mary.Skjellyfetti wrote:They aren't even a top-25 D-II team:Silenoz wrote: People hate when FBS fans laugh at the thought of playing "solid" FCS teams. Central Washington is better than 1/3 of FCS
http://www.d2football.com/top25poll/11/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Does Auburn count Chattanooga as a win over a "solid D-IAA"? You think it makes any sense for them to try to count it as a solid win?
The selection committee is going to see a CWU as a D2 win and Jacksonville as a D1 win, nothing more.dbackjon wrote:T-Dog wrote:The D2 game puts EWU at a disadvantage.
If App makes a good showing this weekend, they get at least a #2.
D2 >>> non-schollie.
Hell, most d@ >>>> than NCCU.
Which is why the criteria are complete bullshit.

appvette wrote:ASU has looked better in conference and out of conference.
In Conference:
Both have 1 loss - ASU lost in overtime by 7 and EWU lost by 23
ASU beat the number 4 team by 30
Average margin of victory in conference:
ASU - 14 EWU - 7
Out of conference:
Compare CWU to NCCU (DII vs. D1): EWU won by 3, ASU won by 28
Compare Jacksonville (ranked 20th) to SUU (ranked 36th): EWU won by 7, ASU won by 31
I won't comment on the FBS game since ASU hasn't played theirs yet. How can you argue these numbers?

T-Dog wrote:The selection committee is going to see a CWU as a D2 win and Jacksonville as a D1 win, nothing more.dbackjon wrote:
D2 >>> non-schollie.
Hell, most d@ >>>> than NCCU.
Which is why the criteria are complete bullshit.

Nonsense - he transferred to SUU, and since they suck every year, they'll never get to play Delaware since that will have to happen in the playoffs. But hey, they're improving!Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:SUU's QB (transfer from BYU) would put up at least 21 points and 300 yards against UD.

Guess they can prove it in the playoffs......oh wait..........they won't make the playoffs. Should have had more of those 300 yard passing games during the regular season.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:SUU's QB (transfer from BYU) would put up at least 21 points and 300 yards against UD.
dbackjon wrote:T-Dog wrote:
The selection committee is going to see a CWU as a D2 win and Jacksonville as a D1 win, nothing more.
And that is one of the major flaws in the system.
No I he think he means the straight cut-off. One counts as 1 win, the other counts as zero wins. I agree with him, since EWU should get just as much credit for beating CWU as MSU should get for beating Drake.appvette wrote:dbackjon wrote:
And that is one of the major flaws in the system.
Are you guys really saying a non top 25 DII is better than the number 20 FCS? And again, even if they are even, look at the margin of victory.

appvette wrote:dbackjon wrote:
And that is one of the major flaws in the system.
Are you guys really saying a non top 25 DII is better than the number 20 FCS? And again, even if they are even, look at the margin of victory.



jd of de wrote:Break down the numbers all you want. Two EWU ass whippings vs. one ASU OT loss.
Silenoz wrote:Because EWU has gotten the sh#t kicked out of them in a loss, ASU has not... yet
dbackjon wrote:So why should ASU be ranked ahead of EWU??


What does last year have to do with anything?93henfan wrote:dbackjon wrote:So why should ASU be ranked ahead of EWU??

Not while they're sitting home watching the playoffs this year.dbackjon wrote:What does last year have to do with anything?93henfan wrote:
You gonna give UD's #1 seed to Nova?![]()
Well, when you put together the recent ineptitude of Big Sky teams without a grizzly bear as a mascot in the playoffs and the fact that App averages almost 30K a game and EWU averages 7.5K, well...dbackjon wrote:What does last year have to do with anything?93henfan wrote:
You gonna give UD's #1 seed to Nova?![]()

Well I can argue the average margin of victory in conference because apparently basic math is an area of emphasis in the Boonies. EWU's average margin of victory in conference is 11.8, ASU's is 16.4. However, we have one conference game left to play, and being that it's against ISU, those averages are likely going to even out.appvette wrote:ASU has looked better in conference and out of conference.
In Conference:
Both have 1 loss - ASU lost in overtime by 7 and EWU lost by 23
ASU beat the number 4 team by 30
Average margin of victory in conference:
ASU - 14 EWU - 7
Out of conference:
Compare CWU to NCCU (DII vs. D1): EWU won by 3, ASU won by 28
Compare Jacksonville (ranked 20th) to SUU (ranked 36th): EWU won by 7, ASU won by 31
I won't comment on the FBS game since ASU hasn't played theirs yet. How can you argue these numbers?

Especially since there won't BE a co-champion.catbob wrote:I just think the Big Sky AQer will get a seed over the "co-champion", especially considering they won the head to head matchup.
