My statement that you say the dumbest "isht" wasn't specifically aimed at your comment about a guaranteed Sac win, but rather the stuff you say in general. However, guaranteeing a Sac win this weekend is dumb, considering that Sac won by a combined 3 points in the two prior games in Cheney; 1 point in 2006 when we we're rebuilding and had almost all freshmen and sophmores playing, and 2 points in 2008 in Baldwin's first year as HC at EWU.SuperHornet wrote:How is that dumb when all of our wins vs. EWU come in Cheney, which is where the game is being played this year?Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
I think they was referring to EWU, not UM. At any rate, they do say the dumbest ****.
Big Sky Predictions 10-23
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
You could be right. They didn't look too great at Roos Field. Then again, will Montana be able to pressure Herrick and force him to make mistakes like EWU did? I feel like our defensive line is better than Montana's at this point in the season. If Montana gives him time, it's going to be a long day for the Griz.grizcountry420 wrote:NAU can't score that many points outside.
Anyway - it's mostly a homer/wishful thinking pick to be honest.

Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Silenoz wrote:I don't think it's absurd to think any BSC team could beat any other BSC team this yearScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:
I did subtract one for the last fumble after time had expired. It didn't decide the game. 3-point EWU win committing 4 turnovers, over Montana committing 5 turnovers. Hence -1 for UM, or +1 for EWU. That blocked punt for a TD was just an excellent special teams play by RB Darriell Beaumonte. Kid is a beast on ST.
I don't think NAU will be committing that many turnovers, and the Griz continue to turn it over, hence why I think the Jacks will in an close one. It's not absurd to think they can get a win in WGS this weekend, especially when Sac came so close.

-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
I like these picks, but I think NAU will win by 7.EWURanger wrote:NAU 31 @ UM 28
UNC 14 @ MSU 38
PSU 35 @ WSU 24
Sac State 28 @ EWU 31
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- grizcountry420
- Level1

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
- I am a fan of: The University of Montana
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
EWURanger wrote:You could be right. They didn't look too great at Roos Field. Then again, will Montana be able to pressure Herrick and force him to make mistakes like EWU did? I feel like our defensive line is better than Montana's at this point in the season. If Montana gives him time, it's going to be a long day for the Griz.grizcountry420 wrote:NAU can't score that many points outside.
Anyway - it's mostly a homer/wishful thinking pick to be honest.
We've been able to put pressure on the QB all year. Montana leads the Big Sky in sacks, so i think Herrick is gonna be in for a long day with all the pressure and noise he's gonna have to deal with. The only downside to our D line is that one of our top pass rushers intentionally got chopped blocked last week @ P State and shattered his knee cap but we have pretty good depth at the D line. It should be a great game. I cant wait til tomorrow. Go Griz!!
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5437
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!grizcountry420 wrote:The only downside to our D line is that one of our top pass rushers intentionally got chopped blocked last week @ P State and shattered his knee cap but we have pretty good depth at the D line.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Not saying it was intentional - but I watched it a couple of times and it didn't look good.JALMOND wrote:Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!grizcountry420 wrote:The only downside to our D line is that one of our top pass rushers intentionally got chopped blocked last week @ P State and shattered his knee cap but we have pretty good depth at the D line.

- grizcountry420
- Level1

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
- I am a fan of: The University of Montana
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Watch the video, ya butt pirate!!!! Looks intentional too me. Your just upset cuz p-state sucks!!!JALMOND wrote:Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!grizcountry420 wrote:The only downside to our D line is that one of our top pass rushers intentionally got chopped blocked last week @ P State and shattered his knee cap but we have pretty good depth at the D line.
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5437
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
It didn't, I'll say that. Neither did the block on our linebacker later on that caused him to be removed on a stretcher. The officials did not throw a flag on either play and neither offensive player was suspended. I don't know if Pflugrad or Burton submitted the video showing these two or if Fullerton decided not to suspend. "Intentional" is the word that showed up many times on egriz. I've been waiting for it to show up here. Neither team has suspended their player involved either, and from what I know about both Pflugrad and Burton, dirty football and "intent to injure an opponent" is something both of them would never stand for. No one wants to get a rap like that, especially in your first year coaching in the conference.EWURanger wrote:Not saying it was intentional - but I watched it a couple of times and it didn't look good.JALMOND wrote:
Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!
- grizcountry420
- Level1

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
- I am a fan of: The University of Montana
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
grizcountry420 wrote:Watch the video, ya butt pirate!!!! Looks intentional too me. Why else would you bring in your saftey to play receiver. Your just upset cuz p-state sucks!!!JALMOND wrote:
Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5437
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
(yawn) Yeah, whatever. That must be it. I think you should spend more time on your Hellgate High School English homework, but what do I know.grizcountry420 wrote:Watch the video, ya butt pirate!!!! Looks intentional too me. Your just upset cuz p-state sucks!!!JALMOND wrote:
Intentionally is a big word, newbie. I suggest in the future, before you throw around ridiculous accusations, you back it up with some sort of support. This ain't egriz, cowboy!
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Word (on egriz *cough*) is that Pflugrad didJALMOND wrote:It didn't, I'll say that. Neither did the block on our linebacker later on that caused him to be removed on a stretcher. The officials did not throw a flag on either play and neither offensive player was suspended. I don't know if Pflugrad or Burton submitted the video showing these two or if Fullerton decided not to suspend. "Intentional" is the word that showed up many times on egriz. I've been waiting for it to show up here. Neither team has suspended their player involved either, and from what I know about both Pflugrad and Burton, dirty football and "intent to injure an opponent" is something both of them would never stand for. No one wants to get a rap like that, especially in your first year coaching in the conference.EWURanger wrote:
Not saying it was intentional - but I watched it a couple of times and it didn't look good.
- grizcountry420
- Level1

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
- I am a fan of: The University of Montana
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Not much..JALMOND wrote:(yawn) Yeah, whatever. That must be it. I think you should spend more time on your Hellgate High School English homework, but what do I know.grizcountry420 wrote:
Watch the video, ya butt pirate!!!! Looks intentional too me. Your just upset cuz p-state sucks!!!
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5437
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Submit the video or suspend the player? I checked again Fritz's writeup on this week's Griz game and there was no mention of a Griz player being suspended, but he did have a bit more on this hit. Griz fans may say the hit was intentional, I could say the hit on the PSU player was intentional (and what seems to be a reaction to the hit on Campbell). But intention is a strong word and something that is extremely difficult to prove, especially when it goes against what both coaches involved seem to stand for. The officials did not flag either play, the conference has not suspended anyone and, from what I've been able to find out, neither coach has suspended anyone. Therefore I am willing to say that there was no intent on either play, just a couple unfortunate injuries as a result of tough football, something I for one have come to expect from both teams. Very unfortunate as both Campbell and Shoemaker were having great seasons for their respective teams.Silenoz wrote:Word (on egriz *cough*) is that Pflugrad didJALMOND wrote:
It didn't, I'll say that. Neither did the block on our linebacker later on that caused him to be removed on a stretcher. The officials did not throw a flag on either play and neither offensive player was suspended. I don't know if Pflugrad or Burton submitted the video showing these two or if Fullerton decided not to suspend. "Intentional" is the word that showed up many times on egriz. I've been waiting for it to show up here. Neither team has suspended their player involved either, and from what I know about both Pflugrad and Burton, dirty football and "intent to injure an opponent" is something both of them would never stand for. No one wants to get a rap like that, especially in your first year coaching in the conference.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
On the video being submittedJALMOND wrote:Submit the video or suspend the player? I checked again Fritz's writeup on this week's Griz game and there was no mention of a Griz player being suspended, but he did have a bit more on this hit. Griz fans may say the hit was intentional, I could say the hit on the PSU player was intentional (and what seems to be a reaction to the hit on Campbell). But intention is a strong word and something that is extremely difficult to prove, especially when it goes against what both coaches involved seem to stand for. The officials did not flag either play, the conference has not suspended anyone and, from what I've been able to find out, neither coach has suspended anyone. Therefore I am willing to say that there was no intent on either play, just a couple unfortunate injuries as a result of tough football, something I for one have come to expect from both teams. Very unfortunate as both Campbell and Shoemaker were having great seasons for their respective teams.Silenoz wrote: Word (on egriz *cough*) is that Pflugrad did
-
BigSkyFootball
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 12:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
First of all, NAU's Michael Herrick is the best QB that the Griz will face this year. He is as good as any QB in the FCS and if given the opportunity, he will purge the Griz defense (like he did last year in Flagstaff). But unlike last year when the Jacks had the worst defense in the country, they now have the best defense in the country. This is a very good and dangerous NAU team and they are starting to play well on both sides of the ball. With that said, the Jacks will be confronted with the best home field advantage in the FCS and the loudest stadium in the Big Sky Conference. This will have an effect on them and, if the Griz do not turn the ball over like they have done recently, the Griz fans will carry Montana to a very slim victory in a very exciting game. Finally, is it necessary that we have to hear so much about the Inferno in Cheney, WA? Cheyney is not the end of the world but you can see it from there. Why they just don't "blow the place up" and start over, I'll never know 
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Man, you're asking for the rath of Scream Eagle et al.
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
FIFY.BigSkyFootball wrote:First of all, NAU's Michael Herrick is the best QB that the Griz will face this year. He is as good as any QB in the FCS and if given the opportunity, he will purge the Griz defense (like he did last year in Flagstaff). But unlike last year when the Jacks had the worst defense in the country, they now have the best defense in the country. This is a very good and dangerous NAU team and they are starting to play well on both sides of the ball. With that said, the Jacks will be confronted with the best home field advantage in the FCS and the loudest stadium in the Big Sky Conference. This will have an effect on them and, if the Griz do not turn the ball over like they have done all season, the Griz fans will carry Montana to a very slim victory in a very exciting game. Finally, is it necessary that we have to hear so much about the Inferno in Cheney, WA? Cheyney is not the end of the world but you can see it from there. Why they just don't "blow the place up" and start over, I'll never know
Pretty big IF.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Yeah S_E, cuz EWU never turns the ball over either. 
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Never said we didn't. But the Griz are giving the ball away almost 4 times a game againt D-I competition.Willie wrote:Yeah S_E, cuz EWU never turns the ball over either.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
We still have a positive turnover margin, Copernicus.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Never said we didn't. But the Griz are giving the ball away almost 4 times a game againt D-I competition.Willie wrote:Yeah S_E, cuz EWU never turns the ball over either.
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Barely, and you're barely eeking out wins against lesser teams. NAU isn't a lesser team, Copernicus.Grizalltheway wrote:We still have a positive turnover margin, Copernicus.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Never said we didn't. But the Griz are giving the ball away almost 4 times a game againt D-I competition.![]()
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Barely, and you're barely eeking out wins against lesser teams. NAU isn't a lesser team, Copernicus.Grizalltheway wrote:
We still have a positive turnover margin, Copernicus.![]()
![]()
Says the guy whose team barely made it out of Greasy with a W.
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
Says the guy whose team barely made it out of Hillsboro with a W. And we already beat NAU... despite committing 5 turnovers and only gaining 3.Grizalltheway wrote:Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Barely, and you're barely eeking out wins against lesser teams. NAU isn't a lesser team, Copernicus.![]()
![]()
![]()
Says the guy whose team barely made it out of Greasy with a W.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-23
So now PSU and NoCol are on the same level? Hardly.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Says the guy whose team barely made it out of Hillsboro with a W. And we already beat NAU... despite committing 5 turnovers and only gaining 3.Grizalltheway wrote:
![]()
![]()
Says the guy whose team barely made it out of Greasy with a W.And we already beat your team.
![]()