Big Sky Predictions 10-2
- catbob
- Level1

- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:30 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State
- A.K.A.: CWR and CelticCat
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
What Sac fans don't realize, that this isn't your typica Griz team (yet). Yes, going into WA-Griz anytime and playing well could be considered a moral victory in some circles, because even if the Griz are a little down that is still the toughest place to play in all of FCS.
However, this is a Griz team that lost back to back FCS games for the first time in who knows how long. They have a whole new staff and offense to learn, and so far they are struggling with it.
Don't get me wrong, the Griz could be the most talent laden team in the Sky. But they aren't executing well, and are playing mistake prone football. Sac fans want to give the credit to the Sac defense for that, but so far a pattern has emerged for the Griz pertaining to turnovers, so until the Griz prove they can take care of the ball, the problem is deeper than just the opponent's defense making great plays.
That being said, the Cats are in your typical, prime time for a letdown game. We came off a huge win, are playing our first game on the road, and are banged up on the offensive line. But if we continue to execute like we have been, take care of the ball, and as long as we have Coach Mac on the OL then I think we can be consistent enough to pull this one off. If we play mistake free football, I think the Cats win fairly easily.
However, this is a Griz team that lost back to back FCS games for the first time in who knows how long. They have a whole new staff and offense to learn, and so far they are struggling with it.
Don't get me wrong, the Griz could be the most talent laden team in the Sky. But they aren't executing well, and are playing mistake prone football. Sac fans want to give the credit to the Sac defense for that, but so far a pattern has emerged for the Griz pertaining to turnovers, so until the Griz prove they can take care of the ball, the problem is deeper than just the opponent's defense making great plays.
That being said, the Cats are in your typical, prime time for a letdown game. We came off a huge win, are playing our first game on the road, and are banged up on the offensive line. But if we continue to execute like we have been, take care of the ball, and as long as we have Coach Mac on the OL then I think we can be consistent enough to pull this one off. If we play mistake free football, I think the Cats win fairly easily.
- Herky
- Level1

- Posts: 471
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State
- A.K.A.: StungAlum
- Location: Anywhere but Davis!
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
What Bobcat fans don't realize is, their arguments are becoming irritating.catbob wrote:What Sac fans don't realize, that this isn't your typica Griz team (yet). Yes, going into WA-Griz anytime and playing well could be considered a moral victory in some circles, because even if the Griz are a little down that is still the toughest place to play in all of FCS.
However, this is a Griz team that lost back to back FCS games for the first time in who knows how long. They have a whole new staff and offense to learn, and so far they are struggling with it.
Don't get me wrong, the Griz could be the most talent laden team in the Sky. But they aren't executing well, and are playing mistake prone football. Sac fans want to give the credit to the Sac defense for that, but so far a pattern has emerged for the Griz pertaining to turnovers, so until the Griz prove they can take care of the ball, the problem is deeper than just the opponent's defense making great plays.
That being said, the Cats are in your typical, prime time for a letdown game. We came off a huge win, are playing our first game on the road, and are banged up on the offensive line. But if we continue to execute like we have been, take care of the ball, and as long as we have Coach Mac on the OL then I think we can be consistent enough to pull this one off. If we play mistake free football, I think the Cats win fairly easily.
Don't get me wrong, MSU is tops in the Sky for now, but that's no reason to act like an ass er Griz fan
If it looks like a cow, smells like a cow, and moo's like a cow, it's a UC Davis coed.
- catbob
- Level1

- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:30 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State
- A.K.A.: CWR and CelticCat
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
What arguments would that be, that are so irritating? I haven't said anything that a fan of the game of football wouldn't notice about this upcoming game. If your argument is about the whole Griz being down, no one giving you the credit you think you deserve for hanging tough in WA-Griz, then that is just my opinion, don't get bent out of shape.
It is a little too early for stats to tell the story, since everyone's stats will be a little skewed from non-FCS competition. But to think that Sac is anything but the underdog in this game is pure homerism. And to think Sac has zero chance of winning is also way off-base. Sac has a decent football team, maybe the strongest they've had in a few years. And you had a good win against Weber at home, no one is taking anything away from that accomplishment.
If I was acting like a Griz fan, I'd be arguing with the other Cat posters here, giving your school zero respect, spouting off historical records of my team versus yours, and using the term "scary good" several times in my observations.
It is a little too early for stats to tell the story, since everyone's stats will be a little skewed from non-FCS competition. But to think that Sac is anything but the underdog in this game is pure homerism. And to think Sac has zero chance of winning is also way off-base. Sac has a decent football team, maybe the strongest they've had in a few years. And you had a good win against Weber at home, no one is taking anything away from that accomplishment.
If I was acting like a Griz fan, I'd be arguing with the other Cat posters here, giving your school zero respect, spouting off historical records of my team versus yours, and using the term "scary good" several times in my observations.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
...or pointing out that UNC has ONE win over a team with a winning record since their move to DI. I can't recall which program it was that they beat thoughcatbob wrote:If I was acting like a Griz fan, I'd be arguing with the other Cat posters here, giving your school zero respect, spouting off historical records of my team versus yours, and using the term "scary good" several times in my observations.
Anyways, we get it. No one in the Big Sky like us
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Careful man, I smell a trap in Greasy tomorrow...Silenoz wrote:...or pointing out that UNC has ONE win over a team with a winning record since their move to DI. I can't recall which program it was that they beat thoughcatbob wrote:If I was acting like a Griz fan, I'd be arguing with the other Cat posters here, giving your school zero respect, spouting off historical records of my team versus yours, and using the term "scary good" several times in my observations.
Anyways, we get it. No one in the Big Sky like us![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- Herky
- Level1

- Posts: 471
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State
- A.K.A.: StungAlum
- Location: Anywhere but Davis!
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
That was a "scary good" postcatbob wrote:What arguments would that be, that are so irritating? I haven't said anything that a fan of the game of football wouldn't notice about this upcoming game. If your argument is about the whole Griz being down, no one giving you the credit you think you deserve for hanging tough in WA-Griz, then that is just my opinion, don't get bent out of shape.
It is a little too early for stats to tell the story, since everyone's stats will be a little skewed from non-FCS competition. But to think that Sac is anything but the underdog in this game is pure homerism. And to think Sac has zero chance of winning is also way off-base. Sac has a decent football team, maybe the strongest they've had in a few years. And you had a good win against Weber at home, no one is taking anything away from that accomplishment.
If I was acting like a Griz fan, I'd be arguing with the other Cat posters here, giving your school zero respect, spouting off historical records of my team versus yours, and using the term "scary good" several times in my observations.
Here's to a good game tomorrow. If you're coming to town, feel free to stop by my tailgate. Right hand side of the parking lot (in the corner) next to the parking garage. Just yell HERKY!
If it looks like a cow, smells like a cow, and moo's like a cow, it's a UC Davis coed.
- catbob
- Level1

- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:30 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State
- A.K.A.: CWR and CelticCat
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
I'd love to, but after traveling for every single Bobcat game this year (including Wazzou), I am looking forward to kicking my back in my recliner, watching the Cats (& griz), and just relaxing! Plus I'm broke. 
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Grizalltheway wrote:Careful man, I smell a trap in Greasy tomorrow...Silenoz wrote:
...or pointing out that UNC has ONE win over a team with a winning record since their move to DI. I can't recall which program it was that they beat though
Anyways, we get it. No one in the Big Sky like us![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

- FAMU Rattler70
- Level1

- Posts: 127
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Florida A&M Rattlers
- Location: Tallahassee,FL
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Idaho St. at Portland St.
Montana St. at Sac State.
EWU at Weber St.
Montana at NoCo
NAU at Southern Utah
Montana St. at Sac State.
EWU at Weber St.
Montana at NoCo
NAU at Southern Utah

The Rattlers will strike, strike, and strike again.
I Bleed Orange and Green
-
Grizo406
- Supporter

- Posts: 5456
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:48 pm
- I am a fan of: UM, MSU, GSU, ASU
- A.K.A.: A true ICON/HOF'er
- Location: NPR, Florida
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
After 4 games, I also think the Cats are better than the Griz.catbooster wrote:We'll see whether they are at the end of the season. I fully expect the griz to begin getting it together and be tough by the time we play them.SuperHornet wrote:The Kitties are NOT better than the Griz. No blowout this week.
Chris Diniz is going to stuff MSU at the end.
But I think that right now, the Cats are better than the Griz.
So far, the Bobcats are gettin' it done, and limiting their mistakes. I'd kinda' like to see that continue...up until 30 November !


- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19504
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
I only "mehed" because I had nothing much to say.frinq wrote:Nice you folks put PSU in the win column. Understandable that the feeling is "meh", since we haven't had a chance in show anything yet. CompughterRankings.com (whateverthe hell that is) has PSU at 30, and Idaho State at 75, so I guess we're doing something right for someone and there's something out there to buttress your prediction this week. About all I can do is smile and say nothing, and wait for the returns. Watch McCaffrey run. Watch our very ordinary QB Cavanaugh hook up a few decent passes (if they aren't knocked down at scrimmage - he's short and throws sidearm) and even run, watch Brown kick a few field goals (he's pretty good at it) - it'll be fun. And yes, we'll win. And I know full well it won't mean a thing until we take on NSU, UNC, NAU etc. Then maybe we'll get some talk about PSU names and stats.
-
NAU_Alum10
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:15 am
- I am a fan of: NAU
- A.K.A.: JackFan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Idaho St 17 @ Portland St 14
Montana St 31 @ Sac St 21
Eastern Washington 21 @ Weber St 28
Montana 35 @ Northern Colorado 10
Northern Arizona 20 @ Southern Utah 10
Montana St 31 @ Sac St 21
Eastern Washington 21 @ Weber St 28
Montana 35 @ Northern Colorado 10
Northern Arizona 20 @ Southern Utah 10

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Grizo406 wrote:After 4 games, I also think the Cats are better than the Griz.catbooster wrote:
We'll see whether they are at the end of the season. I fully expect the griz to begin getting it together and be tough by the time we play them.
But I think that right now, the Cats are better than the Griz.
So far, the Bobcats are gettin' it done, and limiting their mistakes. I'd kinda' like to see that continue...up until 30 November !
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Correct Pick
Incorrect Pick
Actual Score
(-123) = Difference between predicted and actual point spread
APSE = Average Point Spread Error
___________________________________________________
EWU 24 @ 20 WSU
EWU 35 @ 24 WSU (-7)
ISU 14 @ 31 PSU
ISU 3 @ 38 PSU (-18)
UM 28 @ 20 UNC
UM 30 @ 7 UNC (-15)
MSU 34 @ 28 Sac State
MSU 64 @ 61 Sac State (-3)
NAU 24 @ 27 Southern Utah
NAU 26 @ 23 Southern Utah (-6)
___________________________________________________
This week: 4-1
Last week: 4-1
Overall: 26-6
APSE last week: 9.0 pts.
APSE this week: 9.8 pts.
APSE overall: 10.8 pts.
Another crazy week in Big Sky Football.
EWU bounced back nicely in team-effort win over Weber on the road -- without Taiwan Jones. BLM was 23/36 for 337 yards, 4 TDs to 1 INT. WR's Brandon Kaufman and Ashton Gant had 100+ yards receiving on 5 receptions apiece (138 and 110 respectively), with Gant also having 2 TDs. RB's Darriell Beaumonte and Mario Brown combined for 132 yards on the ground and 1 TD, each also with a receiving TD. Three different EWU defenders had an INT; Matt Johnson, Tyler Washburn, and J.C. Sherritt. DT Renard Williams recorded a sack and a forced-fumble.
MSU won a thriller basketball game on a football field, out-lasting Sac State 64-61 in OT after leading 37-10 at halftime. Impressive second half performance by Sac State to rally back, outscoring MSU 35-7 in the third quarter.
NAU won an exciting game in the final minutes after trailing Southern Utah 23-19. Herrick threw his only TD of the game, a 15 yard strike to Zach Bauman with 3:07 left to play to go up and eventually win 26-23. SUU led most of the game after going up 7-0 early on a 44-yard pick-six.
In more boring news, UM shut-down UNC and PSU absolutely dominated ISU.
Still two games back from Jalmond, but came mighty close to tying it up.
Incorrect Pick
Actual Score
(-123) = Difference between predicted and actual point spread
APSE = Average Point Spread Error
___________________________________________________
EWU 24 @ 20 WSU
EWU 35 @ 24 WSU (-7)
ISU 14 @ 31 PSU
ISU 3 @ 38 PSU (-18)
UM 28 @ 20 UNC
UM 30 @ 7 UNC (-15)
MSU 34 @ 28 Sac State
MSU 64 @ 61 Sac State (-3)
NAU 24 @ 27 Southern Utah
NAU 26 @ 23 Southern Utah (-6)
___________________________________________________
This week: 4-1
Last week: 4-1
Overall: 26-6
APSE last week: 9.0 pts.
APSE this week: 9.8 pts.
APSE overall: 10.8 pts.
Another crazy week in Big Sky Football.
EWU bounced back nicely in team-effort win over Weber on the road -- without Taiwan Jones. BLM was 23/36 for 337 yards, 4 TDs to 1 INT. WR's Brandon Kaufman and Ashton Gant had 100+ yards receiving on 5 receptions apiece (138 and 110 respectively), with Gant also having 2 TDs. RB's Darriell Beaumonte and Mario Brown combined for 132 yards on the ground and 1 TD, each also with a receiving TD. Three different EWU defenders had an INT; Matt Johnson, Tyler Washburn, and J.C. Sherritt. DT Renard Williams recorded a sack and a forced-fumble.
MSU won a thriller basketball game on a football field, out-lasting Sac State 64-61 in OT after leading 37-10 at halftime. Impressive second half performance by Sac State to rally back, outscoring MSU 35-7 in the third quarter.
NAU won an exciting game in the final minutes after trailing Southern Utah 23-19. Herrick threw his only TD of the game, a 15 yard strike to Zach Bauman with 3:07 left to play to go up and eventually win 26-23. SUU led most of the game after going up 7-0 early on a 44-yard pick-six.
In more boring news, UM shut-down UNC and PSU absolutely dominated ISU.
Still two games back from Jalmond, but came mighty close to tying it up.
Last edited by Screamin_Eagle174 on Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20791
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
I don't think ANYONE should take credit for the Sac-Cat game today. I had the margin right and the OT right, but it went the other way. I don't think ANYONE figured on EITHER team scoring more than 42, either.
NOBODY gets credit for this one, IMO.
NOBODY gets credit for this one, IMO.

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
But we get the W and you get the LSuperHornet wrote:I don't think ANYONE should take credit for the Sac-Cat game today. I had the margin right and the OT right, but it went the other way. I don't think ANYONE figured on EITHER team scoring more than 42, either.
NOBODY gets credit for this one, IMO.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
cats2506 wrote:But we get the W and you get the LSuperHornet wrote:I don't think ANYONE should take credit for the Sac-Cat game today. I had the margin right and the OT right, but it went the other way. I don't think ANYONE figured on EITHER team scoring more than 42, either.
NOBODY gets credit for this one, IMO.
So, bob, WTF happened?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
We wonAZGrizFan wrote:cats2506 wrote:
But we get the W and you get the L![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, bob, WTF happened?
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Thanks for clearing that up.cats2506 wrote:We wonAZGrizFan wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, bob, WTF happened?
How did the vaunted Bobscat D give up 35 in the 3rd?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5437
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
4-1 this week, puts me at 28-4 for the year, although the Bobcats and Jacks gave me a heart attack. Glad they could pull those games out. Weber a different story.JALMOND wrote:As we put an end to September and move on to October, the games within the conference begin to mean something. As a result the games start getting tougher to predict. Through the month of September I went 24-3. It looks pretty good until one takes a look at the statistics, the big one being that only NAU and PSU won games on the road (EWU did win on a neutral field). This week will be tougher, as most of the top teams go on the road for conference games. Will there be upsets? How many? More importantly, what will the conference look like on Sunday. 24-3 so far. Here are this week's predictions...
EWU @ WSU---The Eagles were brought crashing down to earth last week at Montana State. The Wildcats were putting away a pesky UC-Davis bunch at home. It is still unclear what role Jones will have this week, if he plays at all. The Eagles need other players, namely Mitchell, to step up and take on more of a strong role in order to give themselves a solid chance to win. Problem is, that strong Wildcat defense...WSU 25, EWU 23.
ISU @ PSU--Last year the Vikings were the only victim during the Bengals season, a season that saw them improve every week. The Vikings were on a downward slide towards the end of the year. This season, this game is closer to the beginning of the year. The Bengals had their first game last week, a home loss to NAU. The Vikings are coming into this game off of a bye week. The Bengals won at home last year, take the Vikings in this one...PSU 36, ISU 24.
UM @ UNC---One of those good team on the road games. The Grizzlies feel like they finally turned a corner with their win over Sacramento State at home last week. The Bears feel like they got through their money game and are back to the conference schedule. The Bears also feel like this could be the year they finally get a win over the mighty Griz. Only 2 teams have won road games so far, the Bears held serve against Idaho State two weeks ago, and the Griz looked very ordinary on the road. Yet, this goes to the bigger bears...UM 24, UNC 17.
MSU @ Sac State---Another interesting game and a possible upset. The Bobcats are coming off a very impressive home win over Eastern Washington while the Hornets had to be content with a close game at Montana last week. The Hornets are still thinking this could be their year and all they need to do is hold serve at home. This is the Bobcats first venture on the road in conference play. Their first road game of the year, they lost in the closing minutes to Pac-10 Washington State. The Hornets are not Washington State...MSU 31, Sac State 28.
NAU @ Southern Utah---The Jacks are the only team in the conference that is not playing a conference foe (yet, possibly). But once again, this could be construed as a trap game as it is on the road. However, the Jacks did win on the road last week against Idaho State and looked good against Pac-10 Arizona State. The first one is always the toughest one to get, but the Jacks got their first last week. They should get this...NAU 35, Southern Utah 20.
Hoping to continue perfect as Scream is still behind me.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
If you really care, We had 3 issues, actually 4.AZGrizFan wrote:Thanks for clearing that up.cats2506 wrote:
We won![]()
![]()
![]()
How did the vaunted Bobscat D give up 35 in the 3rd?
1. Missed Bignell in the middle, most of the passes in the second half came in the middle, I dont think grosulack was dropping far enough.
2. Missing O'Connel, Dont know what we are going to do there, we moved ogden out to DE but we didnt get any QB pressure.
3. Missing craney in the secondary was a bigger problem than I thought it would be, it will be good to have him (and hopfully bignell too) back next week.
4. The gameplan was designed to stop the run and make them beat us with the pass, and they almost did, after the last few weeks who woulda thunk that SAC could pass for over 350 yards. I think they got desperate and decided to "go for it", I give SAC credit, most teams down that bad at half will just give up, they listened to their coaches and played thier guts out.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Double post.
Last edited by EWURanger on Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Hard to believe that we could only muster 7 points in the entire game against MSU, but Sac scores 35 in one quarter??
Boy, were we horrible in that game.
Interesting note on yesterday, 3/4 conference games were won by the away team. Also NAU wins @ SUU. Those road wins are going to play a big factor in the outcome of the conference race.
Interesting note on yesterday, 3/4 conference games were won by the away team. Also NAU wins @ SUU. Those road wins are going to play a big factor in the outcome of the conference race.

Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Remember, we were missing a couple of key players yesterday that played almost the whole game against EWU (Bignell & Craney)EWURanger wrote:Hard to believe that we could only muster 7 points in the entire game against MSU, but Sac scores 35 in one quarter??Boy, were we horrible in that game.
Interesting note on yesterday, 3/4 conference games were won by the away team. Also NAU wins @ SUU. Those road wins are going to play a big factor in the outcome of the conference race.
As the game went on tackling got worse and worse, normaly MSU has some very sure tacklers and this is one of the reasons for the success against EWU. I think the oppressive heat was major factor in the tackling issue. Sac had some problems with that in the 4th qtr too. this game was an abnormality in many ways but Sac is for real and you better be ready when the come to Cheney.
Re: Big Sky Predictions 10-2
Oh, without a doubt. I'm really worried about that game as well as NAU. Sac's definitely an improved program this year and they're going to win games in the BSC. They took Montana down to the wire in Missoula and damn near won last night.cats2506 wrote:this game was an abnormality in many ways but Sac is for real and you better be ready when the come to Cheney.
Overall, the BSC seems more balanced this year and I don't think anyone escapes conference play without a loss. Sac, NAU, and PSU all seem to have improved in the off-season and will win games. The only teams that are really out of contention at this point are ISU, UNC, and Weber........sorry Weber, just my opinion - your remaining schedule is brutal and I don't think you'll get through it.




