grizzaholic wrote:
I also thought that was hilarious. That is like saying if we take away that Grand Slam in the 1st inning we win by 3. Typical from a UNC fan. I have yet to find one that is logical.
Yet you're commenting on a game you probably didn't even watch. Yet you've spouted off numerous excuses to why Montana lost. I have yet to find a Montana fan that wasn't a dumbass.
By the way the home attendance was 5497, nothing great.
Hypocrites are funny. You do know that game was on TV, right?
I saw much of it. I don't agree that ISU looked good, though. Tavoy Moore was awesome, but the Bengal offense was terrible.
UNC should be concerned about their pass protection, though. The Bears gave up 6 sacks to a team that only had 8 all of last year.
Jibjab wrote:
Yet you're commenting on a game you probably didn't even watch. Yet you've spouted off numerous excuses to why Montana lost. I have yet to find a Montana fan that wasn't a dumbass.
By the way the home attendance was 5497, nothing great.
Hypocrites are funny. You do know that game was on TV, right?
I saw much of it. I don't agree that ISU looked good, though. Tavoy Moore was awesome, but the Bengal offense was terrible.
UNC should be concerned about their pass protection, though. The Bears gave up 6 sacks to a team that only had 8 all of last year.
Just because it was on TV doesn't mean he watched it. lol
Stick to worrying about Montana, and making excuses on why they lost.
If you don't like what I say you can PM me and get handled.
BigSkyBears wrote:I don't know where you got the info that unc only had 3,000 at the game but our official notes say we had over 5,000. I was at the game and we had way over 3,000. Check the unc websit, it will show the correct number.
I was using Yahoo! as they were the first to post any attendance numbers last night.
EDIT: After further review, the attendance figure for the UNC game will be changed to 5,497 and not the 3k previously listed. This addition will not remove UNC from the being the least attended home game for week 3. That is all.
BigSkyBears wrote:I don't know where you got the info that unc only had 3,000 at the game but our official notes say we had over 5,000. I was at the game and we had way over 3,000. Check the unc websit, it will show the correct number.
grizzaholic wrote:
I also thought that was hilarious. That is like saying if we take away that Grand Slam in the 1st inning we win by 3. Typical from a UNC fan. I have yet to find one that is logical.
Yet you're commenting on a game you probably didn't even watch. Yet you've spouted off numerous excuses to why Montana lost. I have yet to find a Montana fan that wasn't a dumbass.
By the way the home attendance was 5497, nothing great.
And yet...I watched into the 4th qtr before I left to watch the Griz game and then had the replay of the UNC/ISU game on when I got home and did some cleaning. Yup....no watching for me.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:
You're used to being a loser and have much more practice at it so we may need to call on ya for some good excuses.
Be ready slick.
Looks like you already have taken a page outta UNC's book by blowing games late.
Nice to see ya post, I was worried you might be suicide watch after back to back jizz losses.
Keep suckin that cock bro.
Apology accepted.
I don't get that wound up about it but I'm glad to hear you are concerned. It shows some real loyalty on your part.
We have pulled a "UNC" the last couple of weeks but who knows if we'll be able to achieve the mediocrity that you guys have...doubtful, but you never know.
"Keep suckin that cock bro."
Goooood stuff...you're really doin' some good work jj so keep working on your shtick. I'll let ya know when you make it little fella.
Ha! Very funny. NoCo fan says: if we take away Idaho State's best plays we blow them out. Well... no s%&t.
I also thought that was hilarious. That is like saying if we take away that Grand Slam in the 1st inning we win by 3. Typical from a UNC fan. I have yet to find one that is logical.
I was just trying to say that ISU had ONE offensive touchdown, and it was on their first drive of the game. Tavoy Moore is a spectacular player, no doubt, but without him, ISU loses 35-7. The Bengals' offense wasn't near as good as UNC's, nor was their defense. So let's not act like this was some back-and-forth game when ISU went almost 40 minutes without a point and were doubled in total yardage.