New DI Membership Standards

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

2 keys for the WAC to be forced to expand. PAC 10 goes to 12 and the MWC loses 2 member 1 to the P10, 1 to B12. Another is Boise St. going MWC or the MWC going 12 in hopes of getting a BCS autobid. The WAC tried to get to 10 a couple of years ago inviting N.Texas but they said no in hopes of getting in CUSA in the next round of raiding.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by SDHornet »

It will be interesting to see what happens when the dust settles.
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Another key to the Texas schools is (does the WAC realize they're stuck with La Tech and they're probably not going anywhere) So bridge the gap in the #1 football state with a Texas school or 2, or live in denial and hope that UCD, Montana, CP, Sac St. are ready and want to move.
Image
User avatar
slycat
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3454
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:05 pm
I am a fan of: Texas State
Location: Houston, TX

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by slycat »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:Another key to the Texas schools is (does the WAC realize they're stuck with La Tech and they're probably not going anywhere) So bridge the gap in the #1 football state with a Texas school or 2, or live in denial and hope that UCD, Montana, CP, Sac St. are ready and want to move.
If WAC needs someone quick, I could see them pulling Texas St in. This would help get UTSA in 2013 and bridge the LA gap as you mentioned. Thing is that WAC doesn;t want a bunch of FCS and startup teams to "dilute" the conference. But then again Boise St looks to be poached and who else is WAC going to poach from?
Image
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

slycat wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote:Another key to the Texas schools is (does the WAC realize they're stuck with La Tech and they're probably not going anywhere) So bridge the gap in the #1 football state with a Texas school or 2, or live in denial and hope that UCD, Montana, CP, Sac St. are ready and want to move.
If WAC needs someone quick, I could see them pulling Texas St in. This would help get UTSA in 2013 and bridge the LA gap as you mentioned. Thing is that WAC doesn;t want a bunch of FCS and startup teams to "dilute" the conference. But then again Boise St looks to be poached and who else is WAC going to poach from?
Only FBS options Arkansas St., ULL, ULM. I think that the WAC would take their chances that a FCS start up has a better chance of success down the road over those 3. Arkansas St. would be the 1 if they did. New state for the WAC, more success than the others but not much
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by dbackjon »

College football landscape has changed dramatically over the past 12 years.
:thumb:
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by dbackjon »

And adding a commuter school will weaken the WAC IMHO. Adding another big fish in their state has far more REALISTIC upside.
:thumb:
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

Too bad most conferences don't deal in reality. Seriously they don't. Fresno St is a commuter school. We draw well. None of those Big fish in a small pond have said they want to be FBS. Only the Texas schools. The WAC is just looking to survive if it expands after they lose members, they will look for 1. will you play FBS football 2. are you west of the Miss. :?
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45628
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by dbackjon »

Said publically. Most of the machinations happen in private.

Fresno has the support of major metro area, and no real strong dominant state school People don't grow up bleeding Cal colors like they do burnt orange.
:thumb:
User avatar
Fresno St. Alum
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:03 pm
I am a fan of: poontang
A.K.A.: Rainman
Location: My House

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Fresno St. Alum »

dbackjon wrote:Said publically. Most of the machinations happen in private.

Fresno has the support of major metro area, and no real strong dominant state school People don't grow up bleeding Cal colors like they do burnt orange.
Everyone here like fuckin USC and UCLA. as their "real" team and then Fresno St. or they hate us. I grew up liking Nebraska. Still do. I'd go for Fresno over them some of the others still like USC. Fuckin lame.

I know Texas is filled w/ UT and A&M fans but they aren't joining the WAC, they'll take who they can get that looks the prettiest.
Last edited by Fresno St. Alum on Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19511
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by SDHornet »

Fresno St. Alum wrote:
dbackjon wrote:Said publically. Most of the machinations happen in private.

Fresno has the support of major metro area, and no real strong dominant state school People don't grow up bleeding Cal colors like they do burnt orange.
Everyone here like **** USC and UCLA. as their "real" team and then Fresno St. or they hate us. I grew up liking Nebraska. Still do. I'd go for Fresno over them so of the others still like USC. Fuckin lame.

I know Texas is filled w/ UT and A&M fans but they aren't joining the WAC, they'll take who they can get that looks the prettiest.
Same here in SD. USC has a huge bandwagon following with people cheering on the Trojans. God knows most common folks can't afford the University of Spoiled Children. I guess I can't blame them too much, USC is ALWAYS on TV in SoCal. It will be interesting to see how many people jump off the wagon if they start losing now that Carrol is gone.
User avatar
kemajic
Level2
Level2
Posts: 796
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:43 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: Kemajic

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by kemajic »

mlbowl wrote:
Fresno St. Alum wrote: You guys willing to come in? Montana, UC Davis, Cal Poly would all be on the WAC radar. No of you have shown interest in FBS. The 2 Texas schools have.
I don't see Montana moving without Montana St.
Montana is doing the study; Montana St. isn't and is nowhere ready for a move up. Montana's 19.5 M season ticket holders, average attendance of 25 M and strong out-of-state alumni following are unique trump cards. The UM AD only forked over the money for the study when they already knew the answer would be positive. The study results are merely to facilitate the change management.
"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe." - Andy Rooney
User avatar
CatMom
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4289
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
A.K.A.: CatMILF
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by CatMom »

kemajic wrote:
mlbowl wrote:
I don't see Montana moving without Montana St.
Montana is doing the study; Montana St. isn't and is nowhere ready for a move up. Montana's 19.5 M season ticket holders, average attendance of 25 M and strong out-of-state alumni following are unique trump cards. The UM AD only forked over the money for the study when they already knew the answer would be positive. The study results are merely to facilitate the change management.
shouldn't that be 19.5 K?

Anyway, here's an example of our issues. I went to the TXST/UT baseball game Tuesday night (@UT) Sitting in front of me was a lady who turned around to talk to me and a few other fans (from TXST) next to me. She says "Oh, I went to SWT (TXST)." Has 2 (count 'em) 2 Master's Degress from SWT but, she is a UT season ticket holder....wearing the burnt orange and even her hair was kinda almost that color....her reasoning is "she lives in Austin and UT is more convenient!"

That's why we fight/struggle for attendance numbers. And it isn't that it's more convenient now, is it?
Last edited by CatMom on Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by ∞∞∞ »

19.5 million season ticket holders? You guys need a bigger stadium.

hmmm...now I've got myself wondering...what would a 20 million person capacity stadium look like? O_O
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21615
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

∞∞∞ wrote:19.5 million season ticket holders? You guys need a bigger stadium.

hmmm...now I've got myself wondering...what would a 20 million person capacity stadium look like? O_O
He likes to use the M for 1000 instead of the standard K that is in everyday use. It is correct usage in finance/banking/accounting circles but kem likes to use it instead. I think he takes some joy in the M that may have something to do with the M on the mountain behind WaGriz. :lol:
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: New DI Membership Standards

Post by JohnStOnge »

That is ridiculous.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
Post Reply