Gay Hating State Sen Busted For DUI After Leaving Gay Bar

[BlueHen86]

Ok. If the idea is that he was in a homosexual bar being a homosexual he obviously doesn't hate homosexuals. And this thing of calling opposing legislation favored by the homosexual lobby as opposing "rights" really needs to stop. Opposing the idea of recognizing out of state homosexual marriages, for example, is not opposing any rights.

But it does oppose priviledges that others enjoy, which makes it wrong.

[JohnStOnge]

But it does oppose priviledges that others enjoy, which makes it wrong.

Like what? What privledges that others enjoy do homosexuals in this country not enjoy?

I'll go ahead and address the marriage thing since I've discussed it many times.

In this country, any individual can marry another individual of the opposite sex. That is an opportunity...a privledge is you wish to call it that...that ANYBODY has. The fact that someone says you cannot have a relationship with a member of your OWN sex recognized as a marriage is NOT denying you anything that others have access to. At any time, if you are able to convince a member of the opposite sex to enter into a marriage with you, you...like ANYBODY else...can enter into a marriage. You are not being discriminated against...you are not being denied anything that anybody else has access to...by virtue of being told you can't do that with a member of your own sex. Of course I'm using "you" in a rhetorical sense.

[BlueHen86]

But it does oppose priviledges that others enjoy, which makes it wrong.

Like what? What privledges that others enjoy do homosexuals in this country not enjoy?

I'll go ahead and address the marriage thing since I've discussed it many times.

In this country, any individual can marry another individual of the opposite sex. That is an opportunity...a privledge is you wish to call it that...that ANYBODY has. The fact that someone says you cannot have a relationship with a member of your OWN sex recognized as a marriage is NOT denying you anything that others have access to. At any time, if you are able to convince a member of the opposite sex to enter into a marriage with you, you...like ANYBODY else...can enter into a marriage. You are not being discriminated against...you are not being denied anything that anybody else has access to...by virtue of being told you can't do that with a member of your own sex. Of course I'm using "you" in a rhetorical sense.

That seems arbitrary, but since you're a homophobe I'm sure you are okay with that definition.

[JohnStOnge]

That seems arbitrary, but since you're a homophobe I'm sure you are okay with that definition.

Why do you say it's arbitrary? Do you mean the fact that marriage is defined in most places as involving one member of one sex and one member of the other sex is arbitrary? I don't know if that's true, but suppose it is?

Still, it's not a matter of anybody not having the opportunity that anyone else has the opportunity to do. I, as an adult male, can enter into "marriage" with any adult female. Any other adult male can do the same thing. NOBODY is being denied anything that anybody else can do.

As far as the word "homophobe" goes, use it all you wish. I recognize it for what it is. It is a fabricated term created as a tool to attempt to "shame" those who resist the homosexual agenda. It is not going to "shame" me and it has no real meaning beyond "one who resists the homosexual agenda."

[RobsPics]

Latest excuse is that this guy was drinking, and then had a "revelation from God" to go to the gay bar and try to convert everyone back to straightness.

He apparently converted a young boy, who was wearing leather chaps at the time...that's why they left the bar together.

[CID1990]

Years ago, one of the best bars in Charleston was a fag bar. It was called the Treehouse. I used to hang out there sometimes.

also sodomy

[BlueHen86]

That seems arbitrary, but since you're a homophobe I'm sure you are okay with that definition.

Why do you say it's arbitrary? Do you mean the fact that marriage is defined in most places as involving one member of one sex and one member of the other sex is arbitrary? I don't know if that's true, but suppose it is?

Still, it's not a matter of anybody not having the opportunity that anyone else has the opportunity to do. I, as an adult male, can enter into "marriage" with any adult female. Any other adult male can do the same thing. NOBODY is being denied anything that anybody else can do.

As far as the word "homophobe" goes, use it all you wish. I recognize it for what it is. It is a fabricated term created as a tool to attempt to "shame" those who resist the homosexual agenda. It is not going to "shame" me and it has no real meaning beyond "one who resists the homosexual agenda."

Well, since you've come out in favor of pedophilia, I wouldn't expect you to be shamed if I call you a homophobe.

[JohnStOnge]

Well, since you've come out in favor of pedophilia, I wouldn't expect you to be shamed if I call you a homophobe

What I've said in the past and what I'll say again is that, biologically, a sexually mature member of our species of one sex being sexually attracted to a sexually mature member of our species of the opposite sex is perfectly normal and is not pedophilia. In fact, a (say) 30 year old male being sexually attracted to a 16 year old female who has reached reproductive age is a whole lot more normal than a 30 year old male being attracted to another 30 year old male is.

It's just the truth. But I will say that, unlike "homophobe," at least "pedophillia" isn't a term that was invented specifically for the purpose of facilitating a campaign of indoctorination.

[RobsPics]

Well, since you've come out in favor of pedophilia, I wouldn't expect you to be shamed if I call you a homophobe

What I've said in the past and what I'll say again is that, biologically, a sexually mature member of our species of one sex being sexually attracted to a sexually mature member of our species of the opposite sex is perfectly normal and is not pedophilia. In fact, a (say) 30 year old male being sexually attracted to a 16 year old female who has reached reproductive age is a whole lot more normal than a 30 year old male being attracted to another 30 year old male is.

It's just the truth. But I will say that, unlike "homophobe," at least "pedophillia" isn't a term that was invented specifically for the purpose of facilitating a campaign of indoctorination.