CONCORD, N.H.—A panel appointed to study funding for the University of New Hampshire's athletic programs recommends treating athletics as a core rather than auxiliary function, dramatically increasing fundraising efforts and making significant upgrades to aging facilities.
UNH President Mark Huddleston appointed the panel after students balked at a proposed increase in athletics fees in 2008. Under the current funding system, undergraduate fees account for $9 million of the $24 million athletics budget.
In a report released Friday, the panel said UNH athletics provide a high quality product with a limited budget. But it found that fundraising efforts lag far behind other schools, and that some facilities, including the football stadium, are substandard.
http://www.boston.com/sports/other_spor ... athletics/
UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
-
kdinva
- Level1

- Posts: 480
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:24 pm
- I am a fan of: VMI
- A.K.A.: kd
- Location: southside Richmond
Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function
Too bad those folks didn't do a similar study for Northeastern & Hofstra..........dbackjon wrote:Some very smart people on that panel.
1-AA is tops!!
-
danefan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7989
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
- I am a fan of: UAlbany
- Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function
Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.
Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.
Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
The same crap that has been going on Albany for the last 5-7 years. We've had about 5 studies done so far and all agree that we need a facility upgrade in the worst way.
We're still sitting on wooden boards bolted to a set up of steps.
Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.
Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
The same crap that has been going on Albany for the last 5-7 years. We've had about 5 studies done so far and all agree that we need a facility upgrade in the worst way.
We're still sitting on wooden boards bolted to a set up of steps.
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function
Exactly.danefan wrote:Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.
Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.
Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
Maine is in the same boat as UNH with the difference being that donors have stepped forward and facilities have been improved immensely over the past decade.
Go Black Bears!
-
yorkcountyUNHfan
- Level1

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:58 am
- I am a fan of: UNH
Re: UNH Panel: Treat Athletics As Core Function
True, but now we at at least looking at the issue.mainejeff wrote:Exactly.danefan wrote:Plans and studies on paper are wonderful.
Checks being signed and dirt moving are the only things that really matter.
Until that happens this is nothing more than fluff.
Maine is in the same boat as UNH with the difference being that donors have stepped forward and facilities have been improved immensely over the past decade.
-
UnhWildcats05
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:01 pm
- I am a fan of: UNH
