Silenoz wrote:It's like we've single-handedly created your monster. And this is the thanks we getbandl wrote: Speaking of 2004....that was the first time the greatest conference in all the land, the CAA, met up with Montana in the NC game. The first of 3 such meetings. Nice reference there fellas!
Hey fucko if you have a more recent meeting to suggest a look at then do so. You made the crack so you get the smack. In the head to head match you got your asses kicked so being the defeated either shut the fuck up or take the abuse. Your choice.UNHWildCats wrote:by all means live in 2004.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: Did Northeastern beat your ass 47-17 also?
As long as you don't injure me with a streamer. I've heard enough horror storiesJMU DJ wrote:Silenoz wrote: It's like we've single-handedly created your monster. And this is the thanks we get
Apology Accepted,
You're Welcome.
You should talk to Clenz about his "paper" cut, it was brutal!Silenoz wrote:As long as you don't injure me with a streamer. I've heard enough horror storiesJMU DJ wrote:
Apology Accepted,
You're Welcome.
hey fucko. If I can make cracks and u can smack back ain't I allowed to shoot back with something such as "by all means live in 2004"? If I couldnt take the abuse I would just tell u to shut the fuck up and abandon the thread lolUrsus A. Horribilis wrote:Hey fucko if you have a more recent meeting to suggest a look at then do so. You made the crack so you get the smack. In the head to head match you got your asses kicked so being the defeated either shut the fuck up or take the abuse. Your choice.UNHWildCats wrote: by all means live in 2004.
47-17 is an ass kicking the likes of which most BSC opponents don't even get the chance to witness.
Was that the wet paper towel one? Required stiches as I recall.JMU DJ wrote:You should talk to Clenz about his "paper" cut, it was brutal!Silenoz wrote: As long as you don't injure me with a streamer. I've heard enough horror stories
I'm sure he would have made a massive difference.UNHWildCats wrote:hey fucko. If I can make cracks and u can smack back ain't I allowed to shoot back with something such as "by all means live in 2004"? If I couldnt take the abuse I would just tell u to shut the fuck up and abandon the thread lolUrsus A. Horribilis wrote: Hey fucko if you have a more recent meeting to suggest a look at then do so. You made the crack so you get the smack. In the head to head match you got your asses kicked so being the defeated either shut the fuck up or take the abuse. Your choice.
47-17 is an ass kicking the likes of which most BSC opponents don't even get the chance to witness.
Now back to that game... I wish we coulda seen those two teams play with Ball available... coulda been a great game.
The UNH offense nearly gained as many yards as Montana that day. Maybe if they had Ball they woulda finished more drives with points. Would UNH have won had he been on the field? Who knows, but it very well coulda been a closer game.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I'm sure he would have made a massive difference.UNHWildCats wrote: hey fucko. If I can make cracks and u can smack back ain't I allowed to shoot back with something such as "by all means live in 2004"? If I couldnt take the abuse I would just tell u to shut the fuck up and abandon the thread lol
Now back to that game... I wish we coulda seen those two teams play with Ball available... coulda been a great game.
And to answer the former question...no you can't.
I think it's so funny that every time someone loses they bring up that they had a lot of yards.UNHWildCats wrote:The UNH offense nearly gained as many yards as Montana that day. Maybe if they had Ball they woulda finished more drives with points. Would UNH have won had he been on the field? Who knows, but it very well coulda been a closer game.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: I'm sure he would have made a massive difference.
And to answer the former question...no you can't.
No shit, right? I recall one of our players having 178 yards in the first half of last week's game, but something tells me Travis won't be bringing that up.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I think it's so funny that every time someone loses they bring up that they had a lot of yards.UNHWildCats wrote: The UNH offense nearly gained as many yards as Montana that day. Maybe if they had Ball they woulda finished more drives with points. Would UNH have won had he been on the field? Who knows, but it very well coulda been a closer game.
I can't keep you from your fantasy world that makes that game closer for you so enjoy the mind movie my man.
Hey mother fucker I wasn't the one with a paper cut. I actually needed fucking stitches...unlike little bitch Willie who fell on his face and got a small boo boo that he cried about....JMU DJ wrote:You should talk to Clenz about his "paper" cut, it was brutal!Silenoz wrote: As long as you don't injure me with a streamer. I've heard enough horror stories
Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.wideright82 wrote:NATIONAL CHAMPS!!!
Goddamit!AZGrizFan wrote:Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.wideright82 wrote:NATIONAL CHAMPS!!!
You guys created a lame, useless thread involving the CAA and Montana and I haven't posted yet. Screw you all for not e-mailing me and letting me know it was going on without me. Next time, send me a note:
Cluck U wrote:Goddamit!AZGrizFan wrote:
Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.
clucku@lameuselesscommentsaboutthecaaandmontana.com
The answer to the title question...it is a trick question. Montana won't make the playoffs next year because all of Hauck's recruits will follow him to UNLV. That will cause a chain reaction as the Montana State players will realize there are openings at the school they really wanted to attend, so they will redshirt a year in order to be a Griz. Montana will have to play 2010 with a just few eligible transfers and true freshman recruits.
Montana State, of course, will have to fold their football program and the Griz will replace MSU with another home game against a DII opponent.
UNLV, being UNLV, will quickly have their football program investigated by the NCAA and put on immediate suspension. Hauck will soon retire without a single bowl win.
Oh, and Merry Christmas.
Just saw your sig cluck u. Thanks for filling in 
Thank GOD. Then all the "Montana can't move up until MSU is ready and MSU won't be ready for 15 years" crap will go away and Montana can go to the MWC and kick ASS!!!!Cluck U wrote:Goddamit!AZGrizFan wrote:
Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.
clucku@lameuselesscommentsaboutthecaaandmontana.com
The answer to the title question...it is a trick question. Montana won't make the playoffs next year because all of Hauck's recruits will follow him to UNLV. That will cause a chain reaction as the Montana State players will realize there are openings at the school they really wanted to attend, so they will redshirt a year in order to be a Griz. Montana will have to play 2010 with a just few eligible transfers and true freshman recruits.
Montana State, of course, will have to fold their football program and the Griz will replace MSU with another home game against a DII opponent.
UNLV, being UNLV, will quickly have their football program investigated by the NCAA and put on immediate suspension. Hauck will soon retire without a single bowl win.
Oh, and Merry Christmas.
Cluck U wrote:Goddamit!AZGrizFan wrote:
Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.
clucku@lameuselesscommentsaboutthecaaandmontana.com
The answer to the title question...it is a trick question. Montana won't make the playoffs next year because all of Hauck's recruits will follow him to UNLV. That will cause a chain reaction as the Montana State players will realize there are openings at the school they really wanted to attend, so they will redshirt a year in order to be a Griz. Montana will have to play 2010 with a just few eligible transfers and true freshman recruits.
Montana State, of course, will have to fold their football program and the Griz will replace MSU with another home game against a DII opponent.
UNLV, being UNLV, will quickly have their football program investigated by the NCAA and put on immediate suspension. Hauck will soon retire without a single bowl win.
Oh, and Merry Christmas.
After reading that there's no doubt you have a helluva imagination and no doubt believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny.Cluck U wrote:Goddamit!AZGrizFan wrote:
Best post in the whole lame, useless thread.
clucku@lameuselesscommentsaboutthecaaandmontana.com
The answer to the title question...it is a trick question. Montana won't make the playoffs next year because all of Hauck's recruits will follow him to UNLV. That will cause a chain reaction as the Montana State players will realize there are openings at the school they really wanted to attend, so they will redshirt a year in order to be a Griz. Montana will have to play 2010 with a just few eligible transfers and true freshman recruits.
Montana State, of course, will have to fold their football program and the Griz will replace MSU with another home game against a DII opponent.
UNLV, being UNLV, will quickly have their football program investigated by the NCAA and put on immediate suspension. Hauck will soon retire without a single bowl win.
Oh, and Merry Christmas.
. Merry Christmas!!
I did my best to raise the razz level here while you were gone. In some ways, I think I was underappreciated.wideright82 wrote:
If you look at my sig, you will see that App's stellar record against the CAA (although 12 of those wins are against JMU). We're 2-0 against the CAA in the NC Title game so Montana should have forfeited the semifinal if they wanted to avoid a CAA repeat.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:One of the most undeniable truths ever spoken on this board.Skjellyfetti wrote:Appalachian State > CAA
So, I'm writing in Appalachian State University.
It's odd the way it works though...If it weren't for the SoCon we wouldn't have the two we have. I'm not trying to smack there T, but it is strange how it all works out.T-Dog wrote:If you look at my sig, you will see that App's stellar record against the CAA (although 12 of those wins are against JMU). We're 2-0 against the CAA in the NC Title game so Montana should have forfeited the semifinal if they wanted to avoid a CAA repeat.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: One of the most undeniable truths ever spoken on this board.
And for this, I completely blame SDSU.
We've also lost 4 times to JMU.Cluck U wrote:So, ASU has a losing record (or close to it) against the CAA (minus JMU)
Thanks for the clarification!
We don't claim Marshall.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:It's odd the way it works though...If it weren't for the SoCon we wouldn't have the two we have. I'm not trying to smack there T, but it is strange how it all works out.T-Dog wrote:
If you look at my sig, you will see that App's stellar record against the CAA (although 12 of those wins are against JMU). We're 2-0 against the CAA in the NC Title game so Montana should have forfeited the semifinal if they wanted to avoid a CAA repeat.
And for this, I completely blame SDSU.
