Bittersweet day...

[AZGrizFan]

Actually, if I offer to take Oregon +3, and you instead offer Oregon +10, then indeed you ARE stupid.

That means Ohio State would have to beat Oregon by 11 now, instead of just 4 for you to win.

But, if you insist, i'll take Oregon + the points....

As Mr. Bench said, I don't think he understands how gambling works...

I didn't even pick up on it

[BlackFalkin]

I didn't even pick up on it

The things you dont pick up on can fill a warehouse

[TribeFanInNC]

Wow, this is a lot of debate over a post-season exhibition game!

[DuckDuckGriz]

YES! I would rather see USC for the 12th time. And as for the "pac-10" owning the big 12, I think it would be more accurate to say USC has owned the big 10, I havnt seen Oregon do anything special since 2007 when the choked their @sses off with a #2 BCS ranking. Trust me, Oregon WILL lose the game and make the Pacific Ten Conference look like a bunch of chumps that can't 'get it up' on the big stage...

Wrong - the Pac 10 is 9-2 against all conferences in their last 11 bowls - and the Big 10 my friend is no match for the Pac 10 this year, in all honestly.

FInally - common opponents

USC 18
Ohio State 15 (in Columbus)

Oregon beats USC 47-20.
Washington beats USC 16-13. Oregon beats Washington 43-19.

Purdue beats Ohio State
Oregon beats Purdue.


Common opponents really don't matter I guess. I do have to say that hte last time the Ducks played a good Big 10 team was in 2007 against Michigan, where they rolled 39-7. The Big Ten does not have the speed of the Pac 10 - plain and simple.

Pryor is a hell of a QB and will be tough to stop. But I'll take the Ducks 31-24.


Oh.......and you did look pretty silly with "Make it +10"


BTW AZ is serious when it comes to bets. So you better not welch. I know from experience.


Peace.

[BlackFalkin]

Pac 10 is 9-2 against all conferences in their last 11 bowls -

IM TALKING ABOUT USC YOU IDIOT. Show me the stats on all other PAC 10 schools(without SC) vs theBig Ten in the last 10 years.

January 1, 1999 Wisconsin 38 UCLA 31
January 1, 2000 Wisconsin 17 Stanford 9
January 1, 2001 Washington 34 Purdue 24
January 3, 2002* Miami (FL) 37 Nebraska 14
January 1, 2003 Oklahoma 34 Washington State 14
January 1, 2004 Southern California 28 Michigan 14
January 1, 2005 Texas 38 Michigan 37
January 4, 2006* Texas 41 So California 38
January 1, 2007 Southern California 32 Michigan 18
January 1, 2008 Southern California 49 Illinois 17
January 1, 2009 Southern California 38 Penn State 24

Pac 10 vs. Big Ten (Rose Bowl)
1-3
USC vs Big Ten (Rose Bowl)
4-0
Not to mention USC beat Ohio State in 2008 and 2009

Game. Set. Match. BlackFvckinFalkin.

[JMU DJ]

Not to mention USC beat Ohio State in 2008 and 2009

Game. Set. Match. BlackFvckinFalkin.

So what you're sayin' is Ohio State chokes in big games vs legit opponents?

[BlackFalkin]

Not to mention USC beat Ohio State in 2008 and 2009

Game. Set. Match. BlackFvckinFalkin.

So what you're sayin' is Ohio State chokes in big games vs legit opponents?

Yes. And I don't consider Oregon to be 'legit'...And that the other 9 Pac teams choke in Rose Bowl games

[JMU DJ]

So what you're sayin' is Ohio State chokes in big games vs legit opponents?

Yes. And I don't consider Oregon to be 'legit'...And that the other 9 Pac teams choke in Rose Bowl games

I guess when Stanford is whooping up on the Pac 10 competition, you can't really say it's a "Legit" conference

[BlackFalkin]

I guess when Stanford is whooping up on the Pac 10 competition, you can't really say it's a "Legit" conference

Sometimes traditionally weak teams get better, and traditionally good teams, like JMU, fall off the wagon. Right?

[DuckDuckGriz]

Pac 10 is 9-2 against all conferences in their last 11 bowls -

IM TALKING ABOUT USC YOU IDIOT. Show me the stats on all other PAC 10 schools(without SC) vs theBig Ten in the last 10 years.

January 1, 1999 Wisconsin 38 UCLA 31
January 1, 2000 Wisconsin 17 Stanford 9
January 1, 2001 Washington 34 Purdue 24
January 3, 2002* Miami (FL) 37 Nebraska 14
January 1, 2003 Oklahoma 34 Washington State 14
January 1, 2004 Southern California 28 Michigan 14
January 1, 2005 Texas 38 Michigan 37
January 4, 2006* Texas 41 So California 38
January 1, 2007 Southern California 32 Michigan 18
January 1, 2008 Southern California 49 Illinois 17
January 1, 2009 Southern California 38 Penn State 24

Pac 10 vs. Big Ten (Rose Bowl)
1-3
USC vs Big Ten (Rose Bowl)
4-0
Not to mention USC beat Ohio State in 2008 and 2009

Game. Set. Match. BlackFvckinFalkin.

Wow do you always handle your arguments like a six year old?

Your statement makes no sense. I stated that the Pac 10, as a conference, is 9-2 against all conferences in their last 11 bowl games. Yet, you are only highlighting Rose Bowl games - which after saying you wanted all Pac 10 teams vs Big 10 - is Pac 10 vs Big XII --- or only Rose Bowl games (except for the fact you just threw in USC's regular season wins vs Ohio State as well).....So you might want to find one argument - overall record, Rose Bowls, or regular season, but to throw all three in and try to make a point on one is hilarious.

For a USC fan, which you obviously are, you aren't at all very smart. I'm speaking to the strength of the conference, which you don't seem to understand at all.

Here is Oregon vs the Big 10 in the last 10 years (which, if you want to go that road, is weird considering you directly side-stepped my Pac 10 vs ALL CONFERENCES comparison)

Indiana - L - 2004 - 24-30
Michigan - W - 2003 - 31-28
Michigan - W - 2007 - 39-7
Minnesota - W - 1999 - 24-20
Minnesota - L - 2003 - 30-31
Purdue - W - 2008 - 32-26
Purdue - W - 2009 - 38-36
Wisconsin - W - 2001 - 31-28

That's a 6-2 record in this decade........So......you were saying?.....

Or are you going to throw another one of your little fits?

[BlackFalkin]

That's a 6-2 record in this decade........So......you were saying?.....

Michigan - W - 2003 - 31-28
Michigan - W - 2007 - 39-7 - even APP St. beat em that year..
Minnesota - W - 1999 - 24-20
Purdue - W - 2008 - 32-26
Purdue - W - 2009 - 38-36
Wisconsin - W - 2001 - 31-28

Look Poindexter, none of these teams are any good. I want to know about BOWL GAMES, when your nuts are on the line. Not non conference cupcakes.

[DuckDuckGriz]

That's a 6-2 record in this decade........So......you were saying?.....

Michigan - W - 2003 - 31-28
Michigan - W - 2007 - 39-7 - even APP St. beat em that year..
Minnesota - W - 1999 - 24-20
Purdue - W - 2008 - 32-26
Purdue - W - 2009 - 38-36
Wisconsin - W - 2001 - 31-28

Look Poindexter, none of these teams are any good. I want to know about BOWL GAMES, when your nuts are on the line. Not non conference cupcakes.

Then why did you put in USC's regular season wins vs Ohio State?

Michigan in 2003 was a top 5 opponent.
Michigan in 2007 finished by winning the Capital One Bowl against a little team known as the Florida Gators.
Minnesota in 1999, and in 2003 was in BOWL GAMES.
Purdue in 2009, for not being a very good team, BEAT OHIO STATE.
Wisconsin in 2001 was a TOP 5 opponent

So you really wanna use that argument too? Fail.

You're losing this one, and fast. And if you're going to say only USC is a legit opponent for Ohio State this year, and not Oregon, that makes no sense as well - considering the Trojans were beat by 27 and 38 points by Oregon and Stanford.

[BlackFalkin]

Let me ask you 2 questions...

If Purdue beat Ohio State in the 2009 season, and Oregon beat Purdue in the 2009 season... Does that mean Oregon beat Ohio State?

If USC beat Ohio State in the 2009 season, and Oregon beat USC in the 2009 season... Does that mean Oregon beat Ohio State?


If the answer is no, (which it is) then that means you need to save the chatter untill they play. Bc you are an idiot, this will be my last post responding to you... so enjoy it.

[DuckDuckGriz]

Let me ask you 2 questions...

If Purdue beat Ohio State in the 2009 season, and Oregon beat Purdue in the 2009 season... Does that mean Oregon beat Ohio State?

If USC beat Ohio State in the 2009 season, and Oregon beat USC in the 2009 season... Does that mean Oregon beat Ohio State?


If the answer is no, (which it is) then that means you need to save the chatter untill they play. Bc you are an idiot, this will be my last post responding to you... so enjoy it.

I never said that - I was referring to your "legit competition" which you only qualify as USC.

Did you want to side-step the whole last post?

Nice tap out Blackfalkin, I hope mom lets you on the computer again!

[AZGrizFan]

Hey, black crow, are you giving me Oregon +10 or NOT?

It's a simple matter of putting your money where your (apparently) very large MOUTH is....

[BlackFalkin]

WELP looks like I was right.. AGAIN. We had to go back & forth & blah & blah, just to find out later that I was right & all u eggheads were wrong.. for fvcks sake... wake up

[JALMOND]

Put your money where your mouth is then, big talker.
I'll take Oregon +3 for $20. Does that work for you?

No dice. Make it +10.

I know I'm going to hate getting involved with this (I had no money on this game anyway) but here it goes. Buckeyes won by 9, so did Blue (er, I mean) Black Falkin win the bet?

[BlackFalkin]

read the thread, no bet was made...

[native]

Jeezus BF, USC sucks this year, get over it. No one with a brain stem, so I guess that excludes you, would guarantee an OSU win in this game.

How is that brain stem thing workin' for ya, GATW?

In case you missed the score, Oregon lost, 17-26, managing 260 yards to Ohio State's 419.

Seems like USC managed a win, too, although as BF predicted, the PAC 10 as a whole sucked this year.

Since BlackFalkin has no brain stem, his accurate predictions must be pure fvcking magic.

[bench]

No dice. Make it +10.

I know I'm going to hate getting involved with this (I had no money on this game anyway) but here it goes. Buckeyes won by 9, so did Blue (er, I mean) Black Falkin win the bet?

The man said he was giving ten. Makes no difference that he gave away seven points that he didn't have to, or that he was mostly right about the outcome of a hypothetical bet.

Actually, this is a pretty typical BlackFalkin episode — he's at least partially correct about something but yet somehow almost completely stupid at the same time

[Grizalltheway]

Jeezus BF, USC sucks this year, get over it. No one with a brain stem, so I guess that excludes you, would guarantee an OSU win in this game.

How is that brain stem thing workin' for ya, GATW?

In case you missed the score, Oregon lost, 17-26, managing 260 yards to Ohio State's 419.

Seems like USC managed a win, too, although as BF predicted, the PAC 10 as a whole sucked this year.

Since BlackFalkin has no brain stem, his accurate predictions must be pure fvcking magic.

Hey Morton, I never said OSU didn't have a chance, I said it would be dumb to GUARANTEE an OSU win. Nice try.

[BlackFalkin]

Hey Morton, I never said OSU didn't have a chance, I said it would be dumb to GUARANTEE an OSU win. Nice try.

But I did guarantee an OSU win... and they won. Bite that bullet you childish SOB.

[Grizalltheway]

Hey Morton, I never said OSU didn't have a chance, I said it would be dumb to GUARANTEE an OSU win. Nice try.

But I did guarantee an OSU win... and they won. Bite that bullet you childish SOB.

And if they had lost, you wouldn't even show up in this thread to eat your crow. Bite a dick.

[DuckDuckGriz]

OSU played a great game to say the least. Blount's fumble I think was the back-breaker, we woulda been up 24-19 but woulda coulda shoulda I'm glad we were there.

Oh and BlackFalkin you calling someone childish is like me calling AZ a drunk.

[BlackFalkin]

But I did guarantee an OSU win... and they won. Bite that bullet you childish SOB.

And if they had lost, you wouldn't even show up in this thread to eat your crow. Bite a dick.

Cmon GrizAll baby! All I see is a hater desperately reaching for comebacks...