Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Political discussions
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by JoltinJoe »

D1B wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote: Now you're not even making sense.

Does this help Joe:

Uganda's AIDS Decline Attributed to Deaths

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 24, 2005; Page A02

BOSTON, Feb. 23 -- Abstinence and sexual fidelity have played virtually no role in the much-heralded decline of AIDS rates in the most closely studied region of Uganda, two researchers told a gathering of AIDS scientists here.

It is the deaths of previously infected people, not dramatic change in human behavior, that is the main engine behind the ebbing of the overall rate, or prevalence, of AIDS in southern Uganda over the last decade, they reported.

The findings, not yet published, contradict earlier evidence that attributed Uganda's success in AIDS prevention largely to campaigns promoting abstinence and faithfulness to sex partners. Much of the prevention work in the Bush administration's $15 billion global AIDS plan is built around those two themes, and Uganda is frequently cited as evidence that the strategy works.

If the report here stands up to scrutiny -- and, more important, is borne out by surveys elsewhere in Uganda -- it will deflate one of the few supposed triumphs to come out of AIDS-battered Africa in the last decade. The success of Uganda's ABC strategy -- the letters stand for "abstinence," "be faithful" and "(use) condoms" -- has been widely touted and is on the verge of being exported to neighboring countries with the help of American money.

"There is an urgent need to assess abstinence and monogamy in other parts of Uganda," said Maria J. Wawer, a physician at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health who presented the data at the 12th Conference on Retroviruses, the annual mid-winter AIDS meeting in the United States.

Ironically, she and her colleagues found that the one prevention technique whose use did increase between 1994 and 2003 was condoms -- the part of the ABC triad that has been relatively de-emphasized in the Bush plan.

"Abstinence and monogamy are very good behaviors," she said in a press briefing after her presentation. "On the other hand, the data support that in this setting, the behavior that seems to have been the easiest to increase over time is condom use."

President Bush and administration officials have repeatedly cited Uganda's experience in promoting their approach. "We can learn from the experience of other countries when it comes to a good program to prevent the spread of AIDS, like the nation of Uganda," Bush said last June in Philadelphia, adding that the ABC program is "a practical, balanced and moral message."

Wawer's findings come from a study of 10,000 people ages 15 to 49 who live in 44 villages near Uganda's border with Tanzania. Each year researchers have gone door to door collecting blood and urine samples and asking about health and behavior. About 85 percent of residents cooperate with the study, which over the years has grown to include AIDS treatment and prevention services as well as research.

Today, the Rakai Health Sciences Program -- which is run by Columbia, Johns Hopkins University and several Ugandan organizations -- has about 400 employees. They include physicians, counselors and AIDS prevention educators.

Uganda is one of the 15 "target countries" in the Bush AIDS program, formally known as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.

In the Rakai district, the percentage of women infected with HIV fell from 20 percent in 1994 to 13 percent in 2003. For men, the rate of infection declined from 15 percent to 9 percent, a decline of roughly one-third.

Over that same period, however, the fraction of men reporting two or more sexual partners in the previous year rose from 28 percent to 35 percent. The fraction of young men ages 15 to 19 who were not sexually active fell from about 60 percent to just under 50 percent. For women that age, the proportion not having sex remained at about 30 percent through the decade.

The median age of first intercourse for men fell from 17.1 to 16.2 years, and for women from 15.9 to 15.5 years.

Condom use, however, changed markedly over the survey period. In 1994, only about 10 percent of the men said they consistently used condoms with non-marital partners, compared with 50 percent in 2003. For women of the same age, the rate of condom use in non-marital sex increased from 2 percent to 28 percent.

Earlier data indicating that young Ugandans were delaying first intercourse came from surveys of primary school students and national health studies in 1989, 1995 and 2000 that were conducted in different regions each time.

Because the Rakai survey has continued for years in the same place, it also provides an unusually precise measure of the rate of new infections, or incidence.

For women ages 15 to 24, incidence has risen slightly over the last decade, from just below 1.5 new infections per 100 women per year to just above that number. For men, incidence increased from about 0.7 infections to 1 per 100 men per year.

That means Rakai's declining HIV prevalence is not due to a falloff in new infections. Instead it appears to be explained by an increase in deaths. Between the 2002 and 2003 surveys, 125 people became newly infected, and 200 people with long-standing infections died.

"Death alone accounted for a 0.6-percent-point reduction in HIV prevalence that year," Wawer said.

Among her more troubling findings was that the percentage of men who had become infected in the previous year and also reported having two or more partners that year rose from about 48 percent to 68 percent. Newly infected people have unusually large amounts of AIDS virus in their blood and by some estimates are up to 10 times more likely to infect someone during intercourse.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Feb23.html
You are citing the work of two researchers. It was reported in many papers at the time. These results contradicted prior studies ndave been subsequntly contradicted by other studies.

Despite the big build-up in the mainstream media for the Wawer study, it was never published by any peer-reviewed publication.

In contrast, thee was an effective rebuttal to this study that was published in the Post-Graduate Meical Journal and summarized in America magazine. The thrust of this rebuttal was that condom use should be urged as part of an effective anti-HIV strategy, but that the most effective tool to fight the spread of AIDS was and is stressing behavioral changes. It was called "revisiting the ABC Strategy." Unftunately, I cannot find it on-line.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
You are citing the work of two researchers. It was reported in many papers at the time. These results contradicted prior studies ndave been subsequntly contradicted by other studies.

Despite the big build-up in the mainstream media for the Wawer study, it was never published by any peer-reviewed publication.

In contrast, thee was an effective rebuttal to this study that was published in the Post-Graduate Meical Journal and summarized in America magazine. The thrust of this rebuttal was that condom use should be urged as part of an effective anti-HIV strategy, but that the most effective tool to fight the spread of AIDS was and is stressing behavioral changes. It was called "revisiting the ABC Strategy." Unftunately, I cannot find it on-line.

Thank you for recognizing that condoms are an important part of an effective anti-HIV strategy. As I said many times, I agree that ultimately behavioural changes need to occur, untill then we have to deal with idiots and the ignorant violent HIV infected male of Africa.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
You are citing the work of two researchers. It was reported in many papers at the time. These results contradicted prior studies ndave been subsequntly contradicted by other studies.

Despite the big build-up in the mainstream media for the Wawer study, it was never published by any peer-reviewed publication.

In contrast, thee was an effective rebuttal to this study that was published in the Post-Graduate Meical Journal and summarized in America magazine. The thrust of this rebuttal was that condom use should be urged as part of an effective anti-HIV strategy, but that the most effective tool to fight the spread of AIDS was and is stressing behavioral changes. It was called "revisiting the ABC Strategy." Unftunately, I cannot find it on-line.
I'll look for the studies. I've got all fucking day today. :nod:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

Still have not found any refutation of the study I cited. Here's another synopsis:
Reaction
The study's findings suggest that Uganda's "much-lauded success" in reducing its HIV prevalence has "little to do with" the abstinence and monogamy programs emphasized by the Bush administration under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, Reuters reports (Fox, Reuters, 2/24). PEPFAR is a five-year, $15 billion program that directs funding for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria to 15 focus countries (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 2/16). The law (HR 1298) authorizing PEPFAR endorses the ABC model. The measure also specifies that one-third of the bill's HIV/AIDS prevention funding be used for abstinence and monogamy programs (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 4/22/04). President Bush and administration officials "frequently" have cited Uganda as "evidence" that abstinence and fidelity are effective in curbing the spread of HIV, according to the Post (Washington Post, 2/24). Wawer and Ronald Gray of JHU were "reluctant to address directly" how their findings "mes[h]" with the administration's policies, according to the Times (New York Times, 2/24). However, Wawer said that the findings do not mean that the promotion of abstinence and fidelity should stop, according to Reuters. "None of us would in any way denigrate or knock down the abstinence and monogamy message," she said (Reuters, 2/24). A spokesperson for U.S. Ambassador Randall Tobias, head of the State Department's Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, said that OGAC could not comment on the report because they had not seen it (San Francisco Chronicle, 2/24). Dr. Chris Beyrer, director of the Fogarty International AIDS Training & Research Program at JHU's Bloomberg School of Public Health, said that the study's findings emphasize that "condoms are the main preventive tool against HIV," adding that they should be "everywhere alcohol and sex are sold" (New York Times, 2/24).
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by JoltinJoe »

Still waiting to see what professional journal published this study.
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Cap'n Cat »

And, don't even get us started on abstinence-only sex ed, buddy.


:coffee:
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:Still waiting to see what professional journal published this study.

Good for you. :thumb:

Where's the rebuttal, you conveniently could not find. :coffee:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:Still waiting to see what professional journal published this study.
The specific study was presented here:

http://www.retroconference.org/2005/cd/ ... /25775.htm

Joe, do you want more studies like this? I have hundreds of em. Just pull the trigger, counselor. :nod:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Appaholic »

JoltinJoe wrote:
D1B wrote:

Joe, you're not in court, nor are you in catholic fantasy land where the inhabitants are rich, white and happily monogamous. SMFH at counselor Joe. :ohno:

No one thinks condoms are 100% safe.

Where abstinence is unrealistic, especially in male dominated, poor Africa where a significant % of all men are HIV positive - condoms save lives.
Again, people no doubt are amused by your inability to grasp a simple point. Condom use is not safe; it is merely safer. No doubt, if someone is going to abandon common sense and engage in risky conduct, he should use a condom. Just don't delude yourself into thinking this conduct is safe.

Condoms don't save lives. They just make it less likely that a life will be lost. Don't you get it? :ohno:
Agree. But Joe, that's a pretty weak argument against promoting condom use to a population that obviously needs help in controlling the spread of AIDS. While promoting condom use is not 100% effective, niether is promoting abstinence only. Find it hard to understand how you have a problem with the 1-2% failure rate condoms have in not promoting the spread of AIDS, yet, in the past, have basically claimed there is no issue within Catholic church when 1-2% of their priests are charged with molesting children..
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

Appaholic wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:
Again, people no doubt are amused by your inability to grasp a simple point. Condom use is not safe; it is merely safer. No doubt, if someone is going to abandon common sense and engage in risky conduct, he should use a condom. Just don't delude yourself into thinking this conduct is safe.

Condoms don't save lives. They just make it less likely that a life will be lost. Don't you get it? :ohno:
Agree. But Joe, that's a pretty weak argument against promoting condom use to a population that obviously needs help in controlling the spread of AIDS. While promoting condom use is not 100% effective, niether is promoting abstinence only. Find it hard to understand how you have a problem with the 1-2% failure rate condoms have in not promoting the spread of AIDS, yet, in the past, have basically claimed there is no issue within Catholic church when 1-2% of their priests are charged with molesting children..
He thinks he's in court. Abstinence is fine, fidelity is fine, so are condoms. The church needs to stay out of the condom issue and focus on its mission.

Control the spread with condoms, empower women, lift quality of life, educate and so on...
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by JoltinJoe »

D1B wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:Still waiting to see what professional journal published this study.
The specific study was presented here:

http://www.retroconference.org/2005/cd/ ... /25775.htm

Joe, do you want more studies like this? I have hundreds of em. Just pull the trigger, counselor. :nod:
So they presented it at a conference and it was published thereafter ... where?

Hundreds of studies that say the decrease in AIDS-HIV growth resulted from mortality? No you don't.

Take a look at this abstract from the Oxford Center for Religion which discusses the debate about the approach I advocate (ABC) and your approach (Condom, Needle Exchange). Why is it that all the studies cited in this report are from professional, peer-reviewed journals, except the Wawer study you have raised (which is cited as a paper presented at a conference). The point of presenting your paper at a conference is to have it published in a respected journal.

http://www.ocrpl.org/?p=12
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
D1B wrote:
The specific study was presented here:

http://www.retroconference.org/2005/cd/ ... /25775.htm

Joe, do you want more studies like this? I have hundreds of em. Just pull the trigger, counselor. :nod:
So they presented it at a conference and it was published thereafter ... where?

Hundreds of studies that say the decrease in AIDS-HIV growth resulted from mortality? No you don't.

Take a look at this abstract from the Oxford Center for Religion which discusses the debate about the approach I advocate (ABC) and your approach (Condom, Needle Exchange). Why is it that all the studies cited in this report are from professional, peer-reviewed journals, except the Wawer study you have raised (which is cited as a paper presented at a conference). The point of presenting your paper at a conference is to have it published in a respected journal.

http://www.ocrpl.org/?p=12

Then why did they cite it Joe? Joe, why is the study cited in numerous published journals?

When have I ever mentioned CNN, you fucking liar?

Hundreds of studies citing the benefits of condom use in slowing the spread of AIDS, you fucking lying sack of New York corrupt lawyer shit. :nod:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Cap'n Cat »

D1B wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:
So they presented it at a conference and it was published thereafter ... where?

Hundreds of studies that say the decrease in AIDS-HIV growth resulted from mortality? No you don't.

Take a look at this abstract from the Oxford Center for Religion which discusses the debate about the approach I advocate (ABC) and your approach (Condom, Needle Exchange). Why is it that all the studies cited in this report are from professional, peer-reviewed journals, except the Wawer study you have raised (which is cited as a paper presented at a conference). The point of presenting your paper at a conference is to have it published in a respected journal.

http://www.ocrpl.org/?p=12

Then why did they cite it Joe? Joe, why is the study cited in numerous published journals?

When have I ever mentioned CNN, you fucking liar?

Hundreds of studies citing the benefits of condom use in slowing the spread of AIDS, you fucking lying sack of New York corrupt lawyer shit. :nod:

Now, that's not necessary.

:geek:
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Grizalltheway »

Cap'n Cat wrote:
D1B wrote:

Then why did they cite it Joe? Joe, why is the study cited in numerous published journals?

When have I ever mentioned CNN, you fucking liar?

Hundreds of studies citing the benefits of condom use in slowing the spread of AIDS, you fucking lying sack of New York corrupt lawyer shit. :nod:

Now, that's not necessary.

:geek:
But it sure was funny. :lol:
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by JoltinJoe »

D1B wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:
So they presented it at a conference and it was published thereafter ... where?

Hundreds of studies that say the decrease in AIDS-HIV growth resulted from mortality? No you don't.

Take a look at this abstract from the Oxford Center for Religion which discusses the debate about the approach I advocate (ABC) and your approach (Condom, Needle Exchange). Why is it that all the studies cited in this report are from professional, peer-reviewed journals, except the Wawer study you have raised (which is cited as a paper presented at a conference). The point of presenting your paper at a conference is to have it published in a respected journal.

http://www.ocrpl.org/?p=12

Then why did they cite it Joe? Joe, why is the study cited in numerous published journals?

When have I ever mentioned CNN, you **** liar?

Hundreds of studies citing the benefits of condom use in slowing the spread of AIDS, you **** lying sack of New York corrupt lawyer ****. :nod:
It is cited because it was controversial. Others are reacting to a study that received a lot of play in the mainstream press, even though it was apparently presented at a professional conference and thereafter no peer-reviewed professional journal of medicine and/or science picked it up.

The study you cited concluded that the drmatic decrease observed in the HIV rate in Uganda was due to mortality of existing AIDS victims and condom use; and that no impact was measured by the behavior modification message of abstinence and faithfulness.

YOU DO NOT HAVE HUNDREDS OF STUDIES that support this study or conclusion.

The vast majority of published and accepted research studies attribute the decrease to various factors, most significantly behavior modification.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by AZGrizFan »

D1B wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:
What you call semantics I call misleading. People who think condom use is safe, rather than simply safer than unprotected sex, can be inclined to have more sexual encounters and (not to start the discussion about probabilities again) that conduct, multiplied over a society a a whole, could cause more HIV transmissions.

Joe, you're not in court, nor are you in catholic fantasy land where the inhabitants are rich, white and happily monogamous. SMFH at counselor Joe. :ohno:

No one thinks condoms are 100% safe.

Where abstinence is unrealistic, especially in male dominated, poor Africa where a significant % of all men are HIV positive - condoms save lives.
D1B, mindreader of the world. :lol: :lol: :lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Appaholic »

D1B wrote:
Appaholic wrote:
Agree. But Joe, that's a pretty weak argument against promoting condom use to a population that obviously needs help in controlling the spread of AIDS. While promoting condom use is not 100% effective, niether is promoting abstinence only. Find it hard to understand how you have a problem with the 1-2% failure rate condoms have in not promoting the spread of AIDS, yet, in the past, have basically claimed there is no issue within Catholic church when 1-2% of their priests are charged with molesting children..
He thinks he's in court. Abstinence is fine, fidelity is fine, so are condoms. The church needs to stay out of the condom issue and focus on its mission.

Control the spread with condoms, empower women, lift quality of life, educate and so on...
D, you're talking about a church that not only won't acknowledge condoms help confine(not cure) the spread of AIDS, but also encourages same population to procreate when it can't feed itself as is....


"Sorry, Padre, but I'm hungering for a little more than scripture at this point......"
Image
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

JoltinJoe wrote:
D1B wrote:

Then why did they cite it Joe? Joe, why is the study cited in numerous published journals?

When have I ever mentioned CNN, you **** liar?

Hundreds of studies citing the benefits of condom use in slowing the spread of AIDS, you **** lying sack of New York corrupt lawyer ****. :nod:
It is cited because it was controversial. Others are reacting to a study that received a lot of play in the mainstream press, even though it was apparently presented at a professional conference and thereafter no peer-reviewed professional journal of medicine and/or science picked it up.

The study you cited concluded that the drmatic decrease observed in the HIV rate in Uganda was due to mortality of existing AIDS victims and condom use; and that no impact was measured by the behavior modification message of abstinence and faithfulness.

YOU DO NOT HAVE HUNDREDS OF STUDIES that support this study or conclusion.

The vast majority of published and accepted research studies attribute the decrease to various factors, most significantly behavior modification.
Joe, I don't deny the effect of behavior modification. The difference between you and I is I don't deny the effectiveness of condoms either. Plenty of data supports this too. Plenty of data, not of a religious origin too. :nod:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by D1B »

Appaholic wrote:
D1B wrote:
He thinks he's in court. Abstinence is fine, fidelity is fine, so are condoms. The church needs to stay out of the condom issue and focus on its mission.

Control the spread with condoms, empower women, lift quality of life, educate and so on...
D, you're talking about a church that not only won't acknowledge condoms help confine(not cure) the spread of AIDS, but also encourages same population to procreate when it can't feed itself as is....


"Sorry, Padre, but I'm hungering for a little more than scripture at this point......"
Image
Absolutely, like discriminating against gays and raping boys on an industrial scale - the death of Africa will be yet another black mark on the church. It's unfortunate because it does alot of good work. :coffee:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by Grizalltheway »

Hmm, nothing in this article about the effort of the church stopping the spread of HIV :coffee:

http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnol ... d=14952992
ALL epidemics run their course. AIDS will be no exception. But concerted action can give them a helping hand to the finish line, and the latest report from the World Health Organisation and UNAIDS, the two United Nations agencies charged with tackling the epidemic, claims that is what is happening.

The most important figure in the report, which was published on Tuesday November 24th, is 17%. This is the estimated drop in the annual number of new infections compared with 2001, the year that the United Nations Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS was signed. The biggest proportionate fall, 25%, has been in East Asia. In sub-Saharan Africa, where the disease is most rampant, the decline is estimated at 15%. That corresponds to 400,000 fewer African infections in 2008 than in 2001, though 1.9m Africans are still becoming infected each year.


The death rate is also falling, as antiretroviral drugs become ubiquitous. Over the five years to 2008, the report claims, the number of AIDS-related deaths around the world fell by 10%, though it still stands at about 2m annually.

A consequence of the falling death rate, of course, is that there are more infected people who need treatment. The number of those “living with HIV”, to use the politically correct argot of the field, is somewhere between 31m and 36m. Not all of these people need drugs immediately, but almost all will need them eventually. Since the drugs prolong life, but do not cure, the rising number of infected people will provide a challenge to the pockets of rich-world taxpayers, the principal source of funds for these drugs in the poorest parts of the world.

It is not clear how much the falling number of new infections is a result of the activities of the agencies that distribute those funds, and the governments they support, in chivvying people to change their behaviour. The report talks of the benefits of integrating HIV prevention and treatment programmes with other health and social-welfare services, and other such fine phrases, but the direct consequences of such things are hard to measure. What is clear, though, is that the spread of the drugs themselves has been crucial to prevention as well as treatment. In particular, the strategic deployment of antiretrovirals to pregnant women has, the report estimates, stopped some 200,000 mother-to-child infections in the 12 years to 2008.


As to the cause of the drop in the adult infection rate, that is less certain. In this case, too, the drugs may be important. Although antiretroviral drugs do not cure the user, they cause the level of the virus in his body to drop to a point where it is harmless—and also unlikely to be passed on to sexual partners. The report quotes research suggesting that those on the drugs are only a tenth as likely to transmit the virus as those who are not.
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: Pope say condom use makes AIDS worse...

Post by JoltinJoe »

Grizalltheway wrote:Hmm, nothing in this article about the effort of the church stopping the spread of HIV :coffee:

http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnol ... d=14952992
ALL epidemics run their course. AIDS will be no exception. But concerted action can give them a helping hand to the finish line, and the latest report from the World Health Organisation and UNAIDS, the two United Nations agencies charged with tackling the epidemic, claims that is what is happening.

The most important figure in the report, which was published on Tuesday November 24th, is 17%. This is the estimated drop in the annual number of new infections compared with 2001, the year that the United Nations Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS was signed. The biggest proportionate fall, 25%, has been in East Asia. In sub-Saharan Africa, where the disease is most rampant, the decline is estimated at 15%. That corresponds to 400,000 fewer African infections in 2008 than in 2001, though 1.9m Africans are still becoming infected each year.


The death rate is also falling, as antiretroviral drugs become ubiquitous. Over the five years to 2008, the report claims, the number of AIDS-related deaths around the world fell by 10%, though it still stands at about 2m annually.

A consequence of the falling death rate, of course, is that there are more infected people who need treatment. The number of those “living with HIV”, to use the politically correct argot of the field, is somewhere between 31m and 36m. Not all of these people need drugs immediately, but almost all will need them eventually. Since the drugs prolong life, but do not cure, the rising number of infected people will provide a challenge to the pockets of rich-world taxpayers, the principal source of funds for these drugs in the poorest parts of the world.

It is not clear how much the falling number of new infections is a result of the activities of the agencies that distribute those funds, and the governments they support, in chivvying people to change their behaviour. The report talks of the benefits of integrating HIV prevention and treatment programmes with other health and social-welfare services, and other such fine phrases, but the direct consequences of such things are hard to measure. What is clear, though, is that the spread of the drugs themselves has been crucial to prevention as well as treatment. In particular, the strategic deployment of antiretrovirals to pregnant women has, the report estimates, stopped some 200,000 mother-to-child infections in the 12 years to 2008.


As to the cause of the drop in the adult infection rate, that is less certain. In this case, too, the drugs may be important. Although antiretroviral drugs do not cure the user, they cause the level of the virus in his body to drop to a point where it is harmless—and also unlikely to be passed on to sexual partners. The report quotes research suggesting that those on the drugs are only a tenth as likely to transmit the virus as those who are not.
Do you know how much time, effort, and money Catholic relief organizations spend on antiretroviral drugs in Africa? Catholic Relief Services has proven so effective in distributing antiretroviral drugs that in 2008, the federal government named it the consortium lead for a program called AIDsRelief, a program funded by the US Health Resources and Services Adminsitration.
Post Reply