no rights. the issue with a "right to work state" (a misnomer right up there with "clear skies initiative" and "healthy forests policy") is that the people working in those states are basically serfs. the companies have ALL of the power - and they know it, and behave like it.MarkCCU wrote:TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
no, it's not... i've watched this phenomenon with my own eyes, time after time. it's not IAM that did this, Boeing will try hard to put this on them - but they were thrilled to be able to move this to S. Carolina where workers have no real rights.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No real rights? C'mon dude. Don't make a blanket statement that is 100% Bullshit. What's the issue with a Right to Work state? Unions served thier purpose but they f'd themselves when you'd have a high schooler mkaing $38/hr installing rear view mirrors. Bottom line, in any economy situation, is cost and profit. Do things cost less here vice Seattle? Probably? Can they train no-low skill workers to produce a product and competively pay them? Can they provide long lasting jobs? I'll tell you what, all those men and women that have been laid off from Bosch, America LaFrance, Force Protection, MRAP, etc...would be perfect candidates. I'm sure some of the people that worked for Honda would relocate for a good gig. Like Cleets said, as soon as it can strike, it will. It's done it before. Unions know they have the balls of the companies, in thier hands.
Oh Christ? You probably think the South is a bunch of hicks. Give me a redneck mechanic any day of the week over some high schooler that learn on the job and is grossly overpaid.
here's the rub with your entire theory about removing the unions from these kinds of jobs... without their protection, once they move that shit to a "right to work" it's only a matter of time before they ship it to China. why pay a South Carolinian $11/hour when you could pay and abuse a Chinese worker with state support no less for $2/day? the problem is, these right to work states are a stopping point on the way overseas.
look at all the companies you named above... they've all done this exact dance before. why do they move to the south first? so they have cover... plain and simple. if they just tried to move the job from seattle to guangzhu, the political pressure from the unions and american politicians would be intense, since guangzhu can't vote... but by moving it to the south first... you pit one group of Americans against each other... then you just claim "we can't make it work" and flee to asia in 10 years...













