"6 men in the backfield" penalty
"6 men in the backfield" penalty
Anyone else ever had "6 men in the backfield" called against them on punt plays?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
The refs were probably right, but were probably also being activist refs. It was probably the topic of the last MVFC refs meeting and that crew took it to heart.JayJ79 wrote:Anyone else ever had "6 men in the backfield" called against them on punt plays?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
-
TwinTownBisonFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
seemed like it... both NDSU and UNI had tackles who liked to line up just behind the centers numbers... which I agree is likely a point of emphasis... but it was annoying as shit...93henfan wrote:The refs were probably right, but were probably also being activist refs. It was probably the topic of the last MVFC refs meeting and that crew took it to heart.JayJ79 wrote:Anyone else ever had "6 men in the backfield" called against them on punt plays?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
i get why the rule is there and all... and i get that preventing a return of the flying wedge is probably a good thing... it's still an annoying call - in a couple cases on saturday the tackle was close enough (albeit on the edge) and they flagged it (one on each team) this crew just seemed overzealous in general
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions


- spelunker
- Level1

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:22 am
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- A.K.A.: spelunker64
- Location: SE ND
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
No kidding, let them play. That was the most ticky-tack game I've ever seen officiated, on both sides.

-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25100
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Wait til you see the MVC refs buckle to the crowds wishes at the UNI dome.spelunker wrote:No kidding, let them play. That was the most ticky-tack game I've ever seen officiated, on both sides.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
It was almost bad to watch the way the refs were throwing the flag...spelunker wrote:No kidding, let them play. That was the most ticky-tack game I've ever seen officiated, on both sides.
- UAalum72
- Level2

- Posts: 639
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:27 am
- I am a fan of: University at Albany
- Location: Gateway to the Mohawk Valley
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I remember it was called twice on Albany in one game on extra points.
Heard later it was a rookie ref.
Heard later it was a rookie ref.
- spelunker
- Level1

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:22 am
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- A.K.A.: spelunker64
- Location: SE ND
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I heard they got new ones at halftime, others were worn out...clenz wrote:It was almost bad to watch the way the refs were throwing the flag...spelunker wrote:No kidding, let them play. That was the most ticky-tack game I've ever seen officiated, on both sides.
I didn't see much difference in the formations on the DVR later. The whole front line was equal and lined up on the long snappers feet

Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I didn't see anything wrong with the formations either other than maybe everyone on the line was too far off???spelunker wrote:I heard they got new ones at halftime, others were worn out...clenz wrote: It was almost bad to watch the way the refs were throwing the flag...
I didn't see much difference in the formations on the DVR later. The whole front line was equal and lined up on the long snappers feet
Not sure what the refs were trying to prove Saturday, but they proved they don't belong doing D1 football
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Like the SEC refs who called Georgia (and then LSU, after they scored the winning TD) for the bogus (and phantom) "pointing at the crowd" penalty a couple weeks ago? point of emphasis, you know...clenz wrote:...
Not sure what the refs were trying to prove Saturday, but they proved they don't belong doing D1 football
Proletarians of the world, unite!
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Point of emphasis = call it even if it doesn't exist because we can't let the teams or players deciding the game without our help.Rob Iola wrote:Like the SEC refs who called Georgia (and then LSU, after they scored the winning TD) for the bogus (and phantom) "pointing at the crowd" penalty a couple weeks ago? point of emphasis, you know...clenz wrote:...
Not sure what the refs were trying to prove Saturday, but they proved they don't belong doing D1 football
- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
houndawg wrote:Wait til you see the MVC refs buckle to the crowds wishes at the UNI dome.spelunker wrote:No kidding, let them play. That was the most ticky-tack game I've ever seen officiated, on both sides.
Houndawg is already making built in excuses!! Hilarious!
UNI FIGHT
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I do think they go a bit overboard with that this year.Rob Iola wrote:Like the SEC refs who called Georgia (and then LSU, after they scored the winning TD) for the bogus (and phantom) "pointing at the crowd" penalty a couple weeks ago? point of emphasis, you know...clenz wrote:...
Not sure what the refs were trying to prove Saturday, but they proved they don't belong doing D1 football
I agree with penalizing the player when they do that stupid somersault-into-the endzone thing,
or if they are truly taunting.
But I don't see anything wrong with a little celebration, like holding the ball out or a bit of highstepping. If you're offended by something as trivial as that, then perhaps you shouldn't be playing football.
-
CSUBUCDAD
- Level2

- Posts: 669
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:13 pm
- I am a fan of: Charleston Southern
- A.K.A.: MJCOCK, MJ, STUMP
- Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Any time you see a spike in certain penalties it usually means that call was missed several times the week previously


You want my guns? Come take them.
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5475
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Six in the backfield means that there are five on the line. I believe that is the penalty.JayJ79 wrote:Anyone else ever had "6 men in the backfield" called against them on punt plays?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I think he know what it meant, but has a hard time believing that there was 4 or 5 times during that game that the same punt formation was done illegally.JALMOND wrote:Six in the backfield means that there are five on the line. I believe that is the penalty.JayJ79 wrote:Anyone else ever had "6 men in the backfield" called against them on punt plays?
It was called about 4 times in the UNI/NDSU game (with both teams being called).
Looking at the tape, it looked like there was 7 players on the line on those punts, so I don't understand it.
Granted, the linemen were just a tad farther back than the center/longsnapper, but that seems to be the case all the time that I've seen.
Anyhow, it was called on both teams multiple times, so I have to believe that they were just lining up the way that they practiced it, and thus I'm guessing that both teams didn't think their formations were illegal.
Any thoughts?
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
thanks. that higher level math is always so tricky.JALMOND wrote:Six in the backfield means that there are five on the line. I believe that is the penalty.
-
JALMOND
- Level4

- Posts: 5475
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I get lost whenever numbers get higher than eleven. I was surprised I could answer the question.JayJ79 wrote:thanks. that higher level math is always so tricky.JALMOND wrote:Six in the backfield means that there are five on the line. I believe that is the penalty.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45628
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I was too, since you are a Portland State Grad (warming up for PSU game smack)JALMOND wrote:I get lost whenever numbers get higher than eleven. I was surprised I could answer the question.JayJ79 wrote:
thanks. that higher level math is always so tricky.
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
Cap'n just told me that "6 men in the backfield" is also one of the titles from his video collection.
(just kidding with ya, Cap'n)
(just kidding with ya, Cap'n)
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
There has to be 7 on the line, otherwise its iullegal formation..a rule from the NFL all the way down to High School
Re: "6 men in the backfield" penalty
I'm aware of that. But looking at the tape, there appears to be 7 on the line for all those punts, which is what confuses me.isumatt wrote:There has to be 7 on the line, otherwise its iullegal formation..a rule from the NFL all the way down to High School


