Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:16 pm
kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:05 pm

So you’re ok with the announced policy? Because NYT and Democrats?
I'm stunned the NYT would stoop so low as to blow off the Chinese effort, but fill you with nonsense about some mythical group of 15 Russians colluding with Trump via Facebook adds.

The disconnect in their reporting shows how truly despicable they are.
:blah:

What does that have to do with the administration’s announcement? :lol:

I’ll ask again. Are you ok with the administration treating an ideological group with the same ferocity it has treated jihadists with? How about if Obama or Biden had declared the same but with far-right extremists? You would have been fine with that too?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36891
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by BDKJMU »

kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:53 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:16 pm

I'm stunned the NYT would stoop so low as to blow off the Chinese effort, but fill you with nonsense about some mythical group of 15 Russians colluding with Trump via Facebook adds.

The disconnect in their reporting shows how truly despicable they are.
:blah:

What does that have to do with the administration’s announcement? :lol:

I’ll ask again. Are you ok with the administration treating an ideological group with the same ferocity it has treated jihadists with? How about if Obama or Biden had declared the same but with far-right extremists? You would have been fine with that too?
Well they appeased the race communists by labeling the entire right as ‘far right’ and the ‘far right’ and as ‘white supremacists’ and then called them the most dangerous terrorist threat to our country, including while pandering to black audience.

Biden calls white supremacy ‘most dangerous terrorist threat’ in speech at Howard
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/1 ... m-00096811
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

BDKJMU wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 5:19 pm
kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:53 pm

:blah:

What does that have to do with the administration’s announcement? :lol:

I’ll ask again. Are you ok with the administration treating an ideological group with the same ferocity it has treated jihadists with? How about if Obama or Biden had declared the same but with far-right extremists? You would have been fine with that too?
Well they appeased the race communists by labeling the entire right as ‘far right’ and the ‘far right’ and as ‘white supremacists’ and then called them the most dangerous terrorist threat to our country, including while pandering to black audience.

Biden calls white supremacy ‘most dangerous terrorist threat’ in speech at Howard
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/1 ... m-00096811
Jesus titty squeezing Christ are you guys struggling these days.

Do white supremicist/fascist/naziesque things get those labels. Oh wait, that’s right, I need to remember the sources used for news and commentary here.

How many masked groups of threatening, and openly racist groups of socialists do you see marching in the streets? What’s the percentage of violent crimes perpetrated by leftist vs. righties? How many purges of government and especially military officials and officers based on race and gender have you seen from previous administrations?

You really should look this up from real sources of news. Warning though, you might discover how unpopular your movement really is.

Back to the question. Should ANY group be targeted ferociously based on ideology?

If you answer no, then you don’t find this administrations declaration ok.

If you answer yes, you need to GTFO out of this country. We have a bill of rights and things like freedom of speech and the press here.

Mother fucking America, bitches!
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36891
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by BDKJMU »

kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 6:27 pm
BDKJMU wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 5:19 pm
Well they appeased the race communists by labeling the entire right as ‘far right’ and the ‘far right’ and as ‘white supremacists’ and then called them the most dangerous terrorist threat to our country, including while pandering to black audience.

Biden calls white supremacy ‘most dangerous terrorist threat’ in speech at Howard
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/1 ... m-00096811
Jesus titty squeezing Christ are you guys struggling these days.

Do white supremicist/fascist/naziesque things get those labels. Oh wait, that’s right, I need to remember the sources used for news and commentary here.

How many masked groups of threatening, and openly racist groups of socialists do you see marching in the streets? What’s the percentage of violent crimes perpetrated by leftist vs. righties? How many purges of government and especially military officials and officers based on race and gender have you seen from previous administrations?

You really should look this up from real sources of news. Warning though, you might discover how unpopular your movement really is.

Back to the question. Should ANY group be targeted ferociously based on ideology?

If you answer no, then you don’t find this administrations declaration ok.

If you answer yes, you need to GTFO out of this country. We have a bill of rights and things like freedom of speech and the press here.

Mother fucking America, bitches!
Plenty since 2020 from BLANTEEFA to the street commies this past year attacking govt facilities and trying to obstruct ICE, with places like Portland & Seattle seeing the leftist violence continuously in between. Lawl you really want to compare which side has been rioting more since 2020? :dunce: :lol: :rofl:

There have been zero purges of military officials and officers based on race and gender. The only purges have been those who pushed and supported the woke trans DEI cult agenda under the Biden admin.

Yes, any group that pushes a commie ideology should be targeted. Any group that calls for the:
-elimination of the Constitution and drafting a new one.
-replacement of the POTUS & SCOTUS with an “executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress“”
-abolition of the electoral college.
-abolition of police.
-abolition of prisons.
-Public “ie State“ ownership of largest corporations and essential industries.
-open borders.
-amnesty for all illegal aliens.
Many of these commie ideas came out of their “Marxist Unity Group“.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/de ... serve-more

Any group that pushes the above SHOULD BE TARGETED.

And fuck off I’m staying.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

BDKJMU wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 7:12 pm
kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 6:27 pm

Jesus titty squeezing Christ are you guys struggling these days.

Do white supremicist/fascist/naziesque things get those labels. Oh wait, that’s right, I need to remember the sources used for news and commentary here.

How many masked groups of threatening, and openly racist groups of socialists do you see marching in the streets? What’s the percentage of violent crimes perpetrated by leftist vs. righties? How many purges of government and especially military officials and officers based on race and gender have you seen from previous administrations?

You really should look this up from real sources of news. Warning though, you might discover how unpopular your movement really is.

Back to the question. Should ANY group be targeted ferociously based on ideology?

If you answer no, then you don’t find this administrations declaration ok.

If you answer yes, you need to GTFO out of this country. We have a bill of rights and things like freedom of speech and the press here.

Mother fucking America, bitches!
Plenty since 2020 from BLANTEEFA to the street commies this past year attacking govt facilities and trying to obstruct ICE, with places like Portland & Seattle seeing the leftist violence continuously in between. Lawl you really want to compare which side has been rioting more since 2020? :dunce: :lol: :rofl:

There have been zero purges of military officials and officers based on race and gender. The only purges have been those who pushed and supported the woke trans DEI cult agenda under the Biden admin.

Yes, any group that pushes a commie ideology should be targeted. Any group that calls for the:
-elimination of the Constitution and drafting a new one.
-replacement of the POTUS & SCOTUS with an “executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress“”
-abolition of the electoral college.
-abolition of police.
-abolition of prisons.
-Public “ie State“ ownership of largest corporations and essential industries.
-open borders.
-amnesty for all illegal aliens.
Many of these commie ideas came out of their “Marxist Unity Group“.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/de ... serve-more

Any group that pushes the above SHOULD BE TARGETED.

And fuck off I’m staying.
Ooohhh! Another BDK list of opinions and “fake news”. :lol:

I’ve asked and reframed the question several times and still no answer. We’re not talking criminal behavior here as I’ve implied. Of course, prosecute that while still observing the laws of our land.

I’ll be even more succinct. Are you ok with violating or suspending the constitution in order to ferociously go after “left wing extremists?” If so, who gets to define left wing extremism, and what is the bar other than criminality?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

Wait a minute! Whaaaat?



That wrangler couldn’t get him out of there faster.

:rofl:
Image
Image
Image
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 8462
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by Caribbean Hen »

kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:04 pm
Caribbean Hen wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 7:58 am

No capitals were stormed because every Democrat in that video knew the election was not hacked or stolen by the Russians

But then four years later when you tell Americans a demented perverted fool named Joey “weekend at Bernie’s” Biden won the election by an astounding 15 more million votes than Obama ever got…. people have the right to be pissed and ask questions.

Tepid J6 was crazy Nancy’s biggest political victory ever
Still…no capitals were stormed. Here you go trying to argue with facts again. It’s completely unsurprising you’d remember J6 as tepid. :lol:
Wow, I’m gonna have to label you with the first case of CHDS

You can’t even follow along on thread as to what I’m saying.

JFC your brain is up in smoke :lol:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

Caribbean Hen wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 5:58 am
kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:04 pm

Still…no capitals were stormed. Here you go trying to argue with facts again. It’s completely unsurprising you’d remember J6 as tepid. :lol:
Wow, I’m gonna have to label you with the first case of CHDS

You can’t even follow along on thread as to what I’m saying.

JFC your brain is up in smoke :lol:
I’m flattered that you’re imitating what I’ve suggested about you several times.

Thank you!
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19184
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:53 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 2:16 pm

I'm stunned the NYT would stoop so low as to blow off the Chinese effort, but fill you with nonsense about some mythical group of 15 Russians colluding with Trump via Facebook adds.

The disconnect in their reporting shows how truly despicable they are.
:blah:

What does that have to do with the administration’s announcement? :lol:

I’ll ask again. Are you ok with the administration treating an ideological group with the same ferocity it has treated jihadists with? How about if Obama or Biden had declared the same but with far-right extremists? You would have been fine with that too?
You were suckered into believing Trump colluded with Russia on the flimsiest of claims that were dropped when the supposed Russian actors called Mueller's bluff and said they would go to court to fight accusations and now you simply blow off Chinese interference.

You believed Trump should have been removed over a lie, but now you think the administration is crazy over Chinese influence.

Make your waffling make sense. Are you for election integrity or not?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:04 am
kalm wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 4:53 pm

:blah:

What does that have to do with the administration’s announcement? :lol:

I’ll ask again. Are you ok with the administration treating an ideological group with the same ferocity it has treated jihadists with? How about if Obama or Biden had declared the same but with far-right extremists? You would have been fine with that too?
You were suckered into believing Trump colluded with Russia on the flimsiest of claims that were dropped when the supposed Russian actors called Mueller's bluff and said they would go to court to fight accusations and now you simply blow off Chinese interference.

You believed Trump should have been removed over a lie, but now you think the administration is crazy over Chinese influence.

Make your waffling make sense. Are you for election integrity or not?
Desperately swinging…. :lol:

Ummm…I hate to break this to ya but election integrity hasn’t been an issue. Outside influence, both foreign and domestic and legal or criminal (remember all the convictions that came out of Mueller?) has.

One of the greatest attempts in history flew right under your broken radar. :ohno:

Image

Convictions and audio recordings of a crime are fact.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19184
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:16 am
SeattleGriz wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:04 am

You were suckered into believing Trump colluded with Russia on the flimsiest of claims that were dropped when the supposed Russian actors called Mueller's bluff and said they would go to court to fight accusations and now you simply blow off Chinese interference.

You believed Trump should have been removed over a lie, but now you think the administration is crazy over Chinese influence.

Make your waffling make sense. Are you for election integrity or not?
Desperately swinging…. :lol:

Ummm…I hate to break this to ya but election integrity hasn’t been an issue. Outside influence, both foreign and domestic and legal or criminal (remember all the convictions that came out of Mueller?) has.

One of the greatest attempts in history flew right under your broken radar. :ohno:

Image

Convictions and audio recordings of a crime are fact.
And as usual, you know nothing of the granularity.

Simple question. How many 2020 election ballots and images have been inspected by outside of government groups in Georgia?

Yes I do remember Mueller and that was my point. The supposed bad Russian actors got Mueller to drop his case because he didn't have a case.

All the Trump people you try to point to were process crimes. Not a single one had anything to do with "collusion".
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:23 am
kalm wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:16 am

Desperately swinging…. :lol:

Ummm…I hate to break this to ya but election integrity hasn’t been an issue. Outside influence, both foreign and domestic and legal or criminal (remember all the convictions that came out of Mueller?) has.

One of the greatest attempts in history flew right under your broken radar. :ohno:

Image

Convictions and audio recordings of a crime are fact.
And as usual, you know nothing of the granularity.

Simple question. How many 2020 election ballots and images have been inspected by outside of government groups in Georgia?

Yes I do remember Mueller and that was my point. The supposed bad Russian actors got Mueller to drop his case because he didn't have a case.

All the Trump people you try to point to were process crimes. Not a single one had anything to do with "collusion".
:lol:

Ignore Trump’s recorded attempt to steal votes.

Who was supposed to conduct the audits? Trump went 60 and 1 in lawsuits. I suppose SCOTUS was in on the fix? :lol:

And not far up this page I posted the interview with John Solomon. Trump’s team knows no votes were stolen and that he lost 2020. Trump himself likely believes his own bullshit after years of shoveling it and his frontal cortex dementia.

But you keep go ahead and keep on believing a proven lie, conspiracy boy. It’s sweet and charming. :lol:
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69720
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by kalm »

I don’t always agree with him but Kasparov gets it here. :lol:

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19184
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Trump 2.0: MAGAA

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 10:24 am
SeattleGriz wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2026 8:23 am

And as usual, you know nothing of the granularity.

Simple question. How many 2020 election ballots and images have been inspected by outside of government groups in Georgia?

Yes I do remember Mueller and that was my point. The supposed bad Russian actors got Mueller to drop his case because he didn't have a case.

All the Trump people you try to point to were process crimes. Not a single one had anything to do with "collusion".
:lol:

Ignore Trump’s recorded attempt to steal votes.

Who was supposed to conduct the audits? Trump went 60 and 1 in lawsuits. I suppose SCOTUS was in on the fix? :lol:

And not far up this page I posted the interview with John Solomon. Trump’s team knows no votes were stolen and that he lost 2020. Trump himself likely believes his own bullshit after years of shoveling it and his frontal cortex dementia.

But you keep go ahead and keep on believing a proven lie, conspiracy boy. It’s sweet and charming. :lol:
See? Now why isn't that sort of passion put towards China and their undermining of our elections. You suddenly don't care?

We all know why.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Post Reply