UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 12:03 pm
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 11:24 am
I tend not to believe 30/40/50 year old allegations where:
-There’s Zero physical evidence.
-There’s Zero corroborating witnesses.
-The accuser can’t even remember the exact year the alleged incident took place.
-Stories are riddled with inconsistencies.
Nice defense of platner.
To paraphrase SG ...
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2026 1:25 pm
After BDK's defense of trump for years and years, you can see he only repeats maQa talking points.
My favorite was disregarding 26+ rape/sexual assault claims as a politically motivated attack. Disgusting.
Platner’s accusation is from 5 years ago from someone he knew and was dating. The Carroll accusation on Trump and was 40 some years prior where Trump claimed not to even know or have ever met Carroll, who couldn’t even remember the year or location, with no corroborating witnesses or physical evidence, with more holes in her story than Swiss cheese. It was similar to the Balsy Ford claim against Kavanaugh. But in Trump’s case you had the NY State legislature special pass a special get Trump law to eliminate statute of limitations for a year so a high powered donk law firm could bring a civil case against Trump with a left wing claimant, judge, and deep blue jury pool for a civil trial where you only needed a majority. If Kavanaugh had faced similar in DC he would have been found liable
The Civil jury found that Trump didn’t rape her. They found him LIABLE for sexual assault. (There’s no such thing as guilt in a civil trial) If Judge Kavanaugh had faced a civil trial in DC, he would have had the same outcome, and I don’t believe one iota of that Balsy Ford woman’s story, nor do I believe Carroll’s.
Going by WiKi, all the other claims against Trump were mostly groping, with a couple that could be described as sexual assault, from decades prior.