Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[Skjellyfetti]

We also had real leaders during WWII who would have taken responsibility rather than trying to shift the blame with blather and bullsh!t.

Yeah, it would have been:
Modern day CNN in the 1940s: General, the NAZIs/Imperial Japanese govts are claiming you bombed civilian areas, including schools amd hospitals.

General: “Yeah, we leveled the whole fucking city. Destroyed a ton of NAZI/Jap factories, rail yards, etc. Undoubtedly thousands of Kraut/Jap civilians died. Too bad.“

Modern day general

[BDKJMU]

Yeah, it would have been:
Modern day CNN in the 1940s: General, the NAZIs/Imperial Japanese govts are claiming you bombed civilian areas, including schools amd hospitals.

General: “Yeah, we leveled the whole fucking city. Destroyed a ton of NAZI/Jap factories, rail yards, etc. Undoubtedly thousands of Kraut/Jap civilians died. Too bad.“

Modern day general

Except that wasn‘t the case with Germany and Japan in WWII.

[UNI88]

Modern day general

Except that wasn‘t the case with Germany and Japan in WWII.

You want to drop a nuke on Iran?

[kalm]

[Caribbean Hen]

Like the deep blue sea
On a blue blue day

[UNI88]

[kalm]

[kalm]

[kalm]

Seriously. WTF?

[SeattleGriz]

Holy shit. Talk about TDS. Not enough to talk about one's self, but now take the time out of your day to edit someone else's post to complain about Trump.

WTF are you talking about? Who's post did I edit? Stop pulling sh!t out of your ass, you're way too old to be stuck in the anal stage of development you ignorant slut.

Wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the lady in green. Who has that much time on their hands? First you have to come across the video of the gal talking about Ireland, then greenie had to come up with responses and then she had to selectively edit and create her own video. She's apparently got nothing to do all day.

[UNI88]

WTF are you talking about? Who's post did I edit? Stop pulling sh!t out of your ass, you're way too old to be stuck in the anal stage of development you ignorant slut.

Wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the lady in green. Who has that much time on their hands? First you have to come across the video of the gal talking about Ireland, then greenie had to come up with responses and then she had to selectively edit and create her own video. She's apparently got nothing to do all day.

Kind of like our POTUS on Lie Social.

[SeattleGriz]

Wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the lady in green. Who has that much time on their hands? First you have to come across the video of the gal talking about Ireland, then greenie had to come up with responses and then she had to selectively edit and create her own video. She's apparently got nothing to do all day.

Kind of like our POTUS on Lie Social.

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

[UNI88]

Kind of like our POTUS on Lie Social.

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

You're "but, but, but ... deflecting" again.

Attempting to shift the debate to Lie Social is a distraction from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green (Who has that much time on their hands? ... She's apparently got nothing to do all day) also applies to your false god.

The platform (Lie Social, YouTube, Twitter, etc.) he uses is irrelevant.

[UNI88]

Secretary of War Crimes pete puma's Iran war plans are going swimmingly ...

[SeattleGriz]

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

You're "but, but, but ... deflecting" again.

Attempting to shift the debate to Lie Social is a distraction from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green (Who has that much time on their hands? ... She's apparently got nothing to do all day) also applies to your false god.

The platform (Lie Social, YouTube, Twitter, etc.) he uses is irrelevant.

What deflection? Trump's full of shit on how great things are. I've said it many times that he speaks like a CEO that wants to make his 'company' sound like it's always doing great.

It is fact Twitter banned him due to undue censorship, so he created his own company. You are the one who brought up Trump, as you always do even though Trump speaking as POTUS is a far cry from some AWFL taking another person's video to make their own for clicks.

You just can't help yourself.

[UNI88]

You're "but, but, but ... deflecting" again.

Attempting to shift the debate to Lie Social is a distraction from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green (Who has that much time on their hands? ... She's apparently got nothing to do all day) also applies to your false god.

The platform (Lie Social, YouTube, Twitter, etc.) he uses is irrelevant.

What deflection? Trump's full of shit on how great things are. I've said it many times that he speaks like a CEO that wants to make his 'company' sound like it's always doing great.

It is fact Twitter banned him due to undue censorship, so he created his own company. You are the one who brought up Trump, as you always do even though Trump speaking as POTUS is a far cry from some AWFL taking another person's video to make their own for clicks.

You just can't help yourself.

Deflection - attempting to shift away from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green applies to your false god.

You can't help yourself - you're compelled to defend/deflect for your false god and his merry band of bootlicking idiots.

[UNI88]

Kash Patel Confirms UFC Fighters Will Train FBI Agents This Week, Calling It A “Historic Opportunity”

[kalm]

Kind of like our POTUS on Lie Social.

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

So is removing Colbert censorship? How about attempting to do the same to Kimmel?

[UNI88]

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

So is removing Colbert censorship? How about attempting to do the same to Kimmel?

No, no, no. You're expecting consistency.

The double standard of anything that helps trump or that he wants is good and anything that hurts him or that he doesn't want is bad is acceptable to MAQA yahoos like SG.

[SeattleGriz]

What deflection? Trump's full of shit on how great things are. I've said it many times that he speaks like a CEO that wants to make his 'company' sound like it's always doing great.

It is fact Twitter banned him due to undue censorship, so he created his own company. You are the one who brought up Trump, as you always do even though Trump speaking as POTUS is a far cry from some AWFL taking another person's video to make their own for clicks.

You just can't help yourself.

Deflection - attempting to shift away from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green applies to your false god.

You can't help yourself - you're compelled to defend/deflect for your false god and his merry band of bootlicking idiots.

This makes no sense. Trump does not take leftist videos, edit them with his commentary and post the on Truth.

It's too bad you've got three more years of Trump. Can't imagine how much more unhinged you'll be at the end of his term.

[SeattleGriz]

'Lie' Social wouldn't be around if it wasn't for censorship. Remember when Twitter removed him? Trump simply had enough money to create his own social media. The Left is always creating issues and now they can reap the benefits of being dipshits.

So is removing Colbert censorship? How about attempting to do the same to Kimmel?

Trump removed Colbert and Kimmel?

I don't know about Kimmel, but Colbert was a money losing mofo. Colbert and Kimmel screwed themselves over by creating a brand that a very small portion of the country watched. That and they weren't funny.

By the way, you going to give Kimmel a pass on his black face and objectifying women? Only reason that guy had a job is because Liberals always forgive and forget if you virtue signal like an uninformed Leftist.

Key demographics don't lie.

[kalm]

So is removing Colbert censorship? How about attempting to do the same to Kimmel?

Trump removed Colbert and Kimmel?

I don't know about Kimmel, but Colbert was a money losing mofo. Colbert and Kimmel screwed themselves over by creating a brand that a very small portion of the country watched.

Key demographics don't lie.

Demographics is not the same thing as revenue. Much of cable TV is taking a hit. Some of it is evolving toward new revenue streams. The losing money thing is an unsubstantiated rumor. Thought you’d be smart enough to know this. Hey! I found a topic SG isn’t a world class expert in!

To know whether or not Paramount’s explanation is credible, we first need to know whether “The Late Show” really loses $40-50 million dollars a year. That turns out to be far more complicated than one would think. The “this show loses $40-50 million” claim was a “leak” from anonymous sources after the ruckus kicked up. No one can actually confirm it – which is itself somewhat suspicious in gossipy Hollywood. Skeptics of the “purely financial” explanation observe that “The Late Show” has all the hallmarks of a successful show. It’s at the top of the ratings in its time slot right now and routinely wins lots of industry awards. Suddenly it’s losing money!? How?
Believers in the $40 million number argue that late night TV generally has hit hard times. Ratings are half of what they used to be pre-pandemic, with an accompanying drop in advertising revenue for late night television – overall. Sure, goes the argument, Stephen Colbert was a big fish – but in an increasingly smaller pond that has shrunk to a mere puddle. Specifically, while late night television as a whole earned $439 million in advertising in 2018, late night television as a whole earned only $220 million in 2024. But while these numbers show a decline for late night television as a whole, they do not tell us anything specific about the Late Show itself. No one has an actual on the record source for the $40 million dollar number. Everyone citing this number takes it on faith from the two stories (one in Puck and one in the New York Post) which both cite to “anonymous sources.” (For what it’s worth, Colbert expressed some skepticism about the $40 million on The Late Show following the leak.)

These days, it is not at all simple. Most viewing takes place on streaming services or on social media via clips. (“The Late Show” streams on Hulu, for instance, and relies heavily on YouTube clips or clips on the network’s own website.) (CBS also streams full episodes of “The Late Show,” with ads, and streams as part of the “TV Everywhere” package with cable). The monetization of those delivery systems is very hard to figure out. Or, to use the industry term, the way in which networks monetize television shows is “in flux.” How long should you give a clip of Stephen Colbert to count towards the episode revenue on YouTube – a month? A week? The first 24 hours? What even is the financial arrangement between YouTube and CBS? Or Hulu and CBS? What about the revenue from watching the show on CBS.com?

What about the traffic bump to the network generally from clips? If you watch a Stephen Colbert clip, the recommendation software will then suggest other clips of “The Late Show” as well as other CBS programming. As this article notes, “The Daily Show” has had a big bounce from cross-promotion with John Stewart’s podcast. What is the revenue gained by these traffic bumps?

These are all things the industry is in the process of figuring out. As traditional revenue streams fade, other revenue streams emerge – but with even less standard accounting than usual for Hollywood.

https://publicknowledge.org/is-colbert- ... 0-million/

[kalm]

SG…do you think this qualifies as censorship?

[UNI88]

Deflection - attempting to shift away from the reality that your criticism of the woman in green applies to your false god.

You can't help yourself - you're compelled to defend/deflect for your false god and his merry band of bootlicking idiots.

This makes no sense. Trump does not take leftist videos, edit them with his commentary and post the on Truth.

It's too bad you've got three more years of Trump. Can't imagine how much more unhinged you'll be at the end of his term.

"Trump does not take leftist videos, edit them with his commentary and post the on Truth" - typical MAQA tactic - trying to limit the scope of the debate

trump spends hours rage posting on Lie Social. He's too lazy and technologically incompetent to do the editing himself but he has no problem reposting AI generated slop. Doesn't he have anything better to do?

[SeattleGriz]

SG…do you think this qualifies as censorship?

Boy. Not to take a cop out, but first you have to ask what is fake news, then what are you going to do about it. It certainly could be and we both know it probably will be, just to be safe. Sources and methods and all.