See my previous post.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 11:14 am“Infrastructure spending leads directly to runaway inflation”?GannonFan wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2026 10:29 am
Well, that infrastructure act under Biden was just one of many government spending blowouts that led directly to runaway inflation, which we are still recovering from, so I don't see how that can be considered a positive accomplishment. It was easily one of his signature failures.
As for Obama, recovery from the Great Recession was anemic at best - plenty of argument that the means of recovery were in place before he even took office and certainly the slow growth throughout the Obama years was nothing to put on a resume for an accomplishment. Agree that the Affordable Care Act was a step in the right direction, agree that the Dodd Frank reform was good, certainly agree that killing bin Laden was good. However, the Iran nuclear deal was always terrible - maybe it delayed Iran by a decade in terms of nuclear advancement, but with the money that it opened up to Iran it helped to finance their direction of Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis that lead to basically constant fighting in that region ever since. You can argue that what we're doing now is in response to the chaos that deal allowed to happen. And lastly, if Obama can be credited with making Trump decide to make a run in politics that too is a failure - doing something that's led to two terms of a Trump presidency cannot in anyway be considered a good thing.
So many questions….
Should we wait for a recession before increasing spending on infrastructure? Defer maintenance and capital projects until the shit horse fan?
How about long term economic benefits from infrastructure spending? Do those counterbalance temporary inflation?
450 billion in real infrastructure = good
750 billion in leftist pork like New Green Scam= bad.






