Epstein Arrested

[Baldy]

Not sure where you got that from, but hell no.

the director of the fbi

OK

[kalm]

Likely no. Why?

So your question is your little secret? Ok, Champ.

[BDKJMU]

Then redact the names and info for the true victims (i.e. not the wealthy/powerful individuals who might be damaged by the information) and release the files so we can see which are hilarious and which are serious.

Who decides who the "true victims" are? Who in the hell is going to be the responsible party that has final say on which claims are fabricated works for fiction and which claims have actual merit?

There's no doubt that there is likely thousands of people mentioned in those files who had absolutely nothing to do with Epstein's crimes. Is it worth destroying their lives in order to get Trump? If you think so, you're way more sick than I thought.

Even in your altered state of anti-Trump sickness, you know as well as I do that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump, those would have been released a long time ago.

Bingo..

[UNI88]

Who decides who the "true victims" are? Who in the hell is going to be the responsible party that has final say on which claims are fabricated works for fiction and which claims have actual merit?

There's no doubt that there is likely thousands of people mentioned in those files who had absolutely nothing to do with Epstein's crimes. Is it worth destroying their lives in order to get Trump? If you think so, you're way more sick than I thought.

Even in your altered state of anti-Trump sickness, you know as well as I do that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump, those would have been released a long time ago.

Bingo..

You can restate your opinion all you want, it doesn't make it a fact.

[BDKJMU]

Bingo..

You can restate your opinion all you want, it doesn't make it a fact.

And same goes to you. Almost all of your TDS Trump is a ________ are just your opinions.

[bobbythekidd]

You know as well as I that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump that actually had a scintilla of merit whatsoever, it would have been leaked a long time ago.

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

[kalm]

You know as well as I that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump that actually had a scintilla of merit whatsoever, it would have been leaked a long time ago.

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

[Caribbean Hen]

You know as well as I that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump that actually had a scintilla of merit whatsoever, it would have been leaked a long time ago.

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

Wrong thread
as you’re doing something the media never would do and that is talk about Hunter Hookers and blow Biden

[kalm]

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

Wrong thread
as you’re doing something the media never would do and that is talk about Hunter Hookers and blow Biden

Wrong thread
BOCD thread is >>>>>>>>>>>>

[Baldy]

You know as well as I that if there were anything in those files that could bury Trump that actually had a scintilla of merit whatsoever, it would have been leaked a long time ago.

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

That's right bobby, eyewitness testimony and sworn statements stating that GHW Bush and Clinton chopped the feet off and raped a guy in some sort of ritual and the Trump family with Elon Musk are running a child sex slave market out of Maralago. Claims that are totally believable.

[UNI88]

Just in ... Baldy states, "It's going to take a lot more than just eyewitness testimony, DNA, pictures, videos, Bank transfers, phone records, surveillance footage, victim statements, emails, flight logs, and confessions for me to think Trump did anything wrong."

That's right bobby, eyewitness testimony and sworn statements stating that GHW Bush and Clinton chopped the feet off and raped a guy in some sort of ritual and the Trump family with Elon Musk are running a child sex slave market out of Maralago. Claims that are totally believable.

And your argument is that because some of the claims are fantastical, they should all be swept under a rug ignored?

Sucks for the victims, convenient for the pedophiles.

[UNI88]

White House Forced to Admit It Wrongly Accused Man of Child Sex Crimes

The White House has made an embarrassing U-turn after falsely labeling a man a child sex offender on social media.

The official White House X account, which has more than 3.6 million followers, posted a series of images featuring alleged undocumented immigrants the administration claimed were among the “worst of the worst” arrested in Minnesota.

One of the men featured was Victor Manuel Carranza, a Honduran national convicted of larceny and identity theft. However, a graphic shared by the White House falsely indicated that Carranza had committed child sex crimes.

The White House deleted all of the images it posted on Jan. 26 after NOTUS inquired about the error, in which the crimes of another individual appeared to have been displayed on a graphic featuring Carranza.

trump and his circle of cronies show their hypocrisy when it comes to accusations of child sex crimes.

Where is the MAQA concern over potentially innocent people being accused by the trump regime?

[UNI88]

[kalm]

More courage than the entire Republican Party combined.

[kalm]

[Baldy]

That's right bobby, eyewitness testimony and sworn statements stating that GHW Bush and Clinton chopped the feet off and raped a guy in some sort of ritual and the Trump family with Elon Musk are running a child sex slave market out of Maralago. Claims that are totally believable.

And your argument is that because some of the claims are fantastical, they should all be swept under a rug ignored?

Sucks for the victims, convenient for the pedophiles.

That's exactly what I'm saying.

Just look at what you and klamdani are posting in this thread. The most far-fetched unbelievable accusations anyone could ever dream up, but you're posting them here like they're some big gotcha.

In those millions and millions of files, one would think you could find at least find one accusation that could be somewhat believable and not a piece of someone's psychotic fan fiction.

[UNI88]

And your argument is that because some of the claims are fantastical, they should all be swept under a rug ignored?

Sucks for the victims, convenient for the pedophiles.

That's exactly what I'm saying.

Just look at what you and klamdani are posting in this thread. The most far-fetched unbelievable accusations anyone could ever dream up, but you're posting them here like they're some big gotcha.

In those millions and millions of files, one would think you could find at least find one accusation that could be somewhat believable and not a piece of someone's psychotic fan fiction.

If the standard is “any false claim invalidates all claims,” then no large-scale investigation—criminal, civil, or intelligence—could ever proceed. The correct response to bad evidence is filtering, not blanket dismissal.

If some false or extreme claims invalidate the entire body of evidence, then Trump’s own rhetoric invalidates his causes far more thoroughly than anything in the Epstein files:

• trump has made numerous false and fantastical claims of election fraud. By the same logic, all election-fraud claims should be dismissed without investigation, and no election-integrity laws or enforcement mechanisms (FACE Act) would be justified.
• Only some immigration protesters are violent or break the law. By your logic, the trump regime’s entire characterization of these protests as dangerous or criminal should be dismissed outright.
• Only some of the people the trump regime targets for immigration enforcement are violent criminals. By your logic, the claim that immigration enforcement is about public safety should be dismissed entirely, since the category includes many non-violent people and therefore the claim can’t be trusted.

Or an unbiased and professional law enforcement agency could actually investigate the files rather than dismissing all of them out-of-hand.

[Caribbean Hen]

That's exactly what I'm saying.

Just look at what you and klamdani are posting in this thread. The most far-fetched unbelievable accusations anyone could ever dream up, but you're posting them here like they're some big gotcha.

In those millions and millions of files, one would think you could find at least find one accusation that could be somewhat believable and not a piece of someone's psychotic fan fiction.

If the standard is “any false claim invalidates all claims,” then no large-scale investigation—criminal, civil, or intelligence—could ever proceed. The correct response to bad evidence is filtering, not blanket dismissal.

If some false or extreme claims invalidate the entire body of evidence, then Trump’s own rhetoric invalidates his causes far more thoroughly than anything in the Epstein files:

• trump has made numerous false and fantastical claims of election fraud. By the same logic, all election-fraud claims should be dismissed without investigation, and no election-integrity laws or enforcement mechanisms (FACE Act) would be justified.
• Only some immigration protesters are violent or break the law. By your logic, the trump regime’s entire characterization of these protests as dangerous or criminal should be dismissed outright.
• Only some of the people the trump regime targets for immigration enforcement are violent criminals. By your logic, the claim that immigration enforcement is about public safety should be dismissed entirely, since the category includes many non-violent people and therefore the claim can’t be trusted.

Or an unbiased and professional law enforcement agency could actually investigate the files rather than dismissing all of them out-of-hand.

You should listen to some Dersowhich

everything that he said a year ago is happening now and you are a big part of it…

[UNI88]

If the standard is “any false claim invalidates all claims,” then no large-scale investigation—criminal, civil, or intelligence—could ever proceed. The correct response to bad evidence is filtering, not blanket dismissal.

If some false or extreme claims invalidate the entire body of evidence, then Trump’s own rhetoric invalidates his causes far more thoroughly than anything in the Epstein files:

• trump has made numerous false and fantastical claims of election fraud. By the same logic, all election-fraud claims should be dismissed without investigation, and no election-integrity laws or enforcement mechanisms (FACE Act) would be justified.
• Only some immigration protesters are violent or break the law. By your logic, the trump regime’s entire characterization of these protests as dangerous or criminal should be dismissed outright.
• Only some of the people the trump regime targets for immigration enforcement are violent criminals. By your logic, the claim that immigration enforcement is about public safety should be dismissed entirely, since the category includes many non-violent people and therefore the claim can’t be trusted.

Or an unbiased and professional law enforcement agency could actually investigate the files rather than dismissing all of them out-of-hand.

You should listen to some Dersowhich

everything that he said a year ago is happening now and you are a big part of it…

And as usual, you duck any points that don't fit your biased agenda.

[kalm]

If the standard is “any false claim invalidates all claims,” then no large-scale investigation—criminal, civil, or intelligence—could ever proceed. The correct response to bad evidence is filtering, not blanket dismissal.

If some false or extreme claims invalidate the entire body of evidence, then Trump’s own rhetoric invalidates his causes far more thoroughly than anything in the Epstein files:

• trump has made numerous false and fantastical claims of election fraud. By the same logic, all election-fraud claims should be dismissed without investigation, and no election-integrity laws or enforcement mechanisms (FACE Act) would be justified.
• Only some immigration protesters are violent or break the law. By your logic, the trump regime’s entire characterization of these protests as dangerous or criminal should be dismissed outright.
• Only some of the people the trump regime targets for immigration enforcement are violent criminals. By your logic, the claim that immigration enforcement is about public safety should be dismissed entirely, since the category includes many non-violent people and therefore the claim can’t be trusted.

Or an unbiased and professional law enforcement agency could actually investigate the files rather than dismissing all of them out-of-hand.

You should listen to some Dersowhich

everything that he said a year ago is happening now and you are a big part of it…

Dershowitz makes Rudy look reasonable and sober.

[UNI88]

From Facebook ...

I’m going to bring a little heat today, because some things need to be said out loud.

I’ve been deeply immersed in the Epstein files since the latest releases dropped. I can’t stop reading, connecting dots, and trying to understand the full scope of what happened.

And I’ll be honest. It makes me sick.

As a survivor of child sexual abuse, I want to say this clearly first. If you’re a survivor and this topic is triggering for you, please take care of yourself.

You don’t owe anyone your pain. Avoiding this entirely is a valid form of self-protection.

For me, part of my healing has been different. I run toward triggers. Pain fuels my purpose. I need to see the truth, even when it hurts, because truth is what leads to change.

I never needed documents to know Jeffrey Epstein was evil. What he did to children and adolescents is unforgivable. Open and shut case for me.

But this story isn’t just about one man. It never has been.

What these files expose is something far bigger and far more disturbing. They shine a light on how powerful, insulated, and broken parts of our ruling class really are. And the ruling class is also the doner class.

I’ve been saying for a while that we’re often being manipulated into fighting each other over political labels while something much darker operates above us.

This isn’t a Democrat issue. It isn’t a Republican issue. It isn’t even uniquely American.

It’s an evil issue.

There are people with money, influence, and protection who thrive in chaos.

They fund politicians. They shape media narratives. They pit everyday people against one another just enough to keep us distracted, divided, and exhausted, while they preserve the status quo that benefits them.

I learned the hard way a long time ago that child abuse thrives in darkness.

But here’s the good news. Darkness doesn’t survive light.

Child sexual abuse and child sex trafficking are wrong. Period.

There is no political spin that changes that. At our core, most people agree on this.

Protecting children is not partisan. It’s a moral obligation.

This is one of those rare moments where the public is waking up together. I’ve watched lawmakers from different parties stand shoulder to shoulder on this issue.

Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna are a perfect example. I am so honored they are in Washington and working together. Different ideologies. Same mission.

Relentless pursuit of accountability.

That matters.

Because the real reckoning for any political system happens when regular people, regardless of party, say, “I don’t care about the politics. Fix this.”

We are there.

I want accountability. I want full investigations. I want prosecutions where crimes were committed. I want perp walks and networks exposed. That process will be painful. Truth usually is.

There will be attempts to frame this as a witch hunt. Media narratives will try to reduce it to left versus right. Paid influencers will try to muddy the waters.

Don’t fall for it.

This isn’t about protecting a party. It’s about protecting our children.

Not everyone who crossed paths with Epstein is guilty. He was a social operator. People were drawn to power.

The guilty are those who abused children and those who knowingly covered it up. They are the problem.

My neighbor is not my enemy.

Good people exist on both sides of the aisle. Bad people do too. Evil doesn’t wear a party label.

If you’re wondering why this story isn’t dominating every headline, ask yourself who benefits from it staying quiet. Media doesn’t bite the hands that feed it.

But the light is on now and your fingers are on the light switch.

And once light is turned on, it’s hard to turn it off again.

Let this moment unify us. Let it strengthen our resolve. Let it restore faith not in institutions, but in accountability.

Protect children. Expose evil. Follow the facts. And please, ignore the spin.

That’s the work.

And I’m not backing away from it. I am wide awake. I see evil and I will always protect God’s children.

If you read this far and you agree with my words, I would be honored if you shared this post with your network. I don’t often solicit help, but this issue needs as much light as possible. We need to protect the children.

Thank you

[UNI88]

[kalm]

[dal4018]

Robert Kraft has been connected with Epstein Island

[houndawg]

Pedo in Chief

Who would have thunk it?

Some of these Epstein Files are hilarious

Mr. Chitlin!