When did you post facts?
Whatever you think, Skippy.
If it wasn’t for you loons, I wouldn’t even know anything about Jewish space lasers that you’re always talking aboutUNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 06, 2025 7:27 amWhen did you post facts?
The "250 FBI agents embedded in the crowd on January 6" is not a fact, it's a MAQA conspiracy theory just like Jewish space lasers and trump is fighting a pedophile cabal. Just because thousands of nutcases in MAQA yahoo echo chambers believe these whackadoodle conspiracy theories to be true doesn't make it so.
So you have no real proof of these "250 FBI agents embedded in the crowd on January 6" and aren’t really posting facts.Caribbean Hen wrote:If it wasn’t for you loons, I wouldn’t even know anything about Jewish space lasers that you’re always talking aboutUNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 06, 2025 7:27 am When did you post facts?
The "250 FBI agents embedded in the crowd on January 6" is not a fact, it's a MAQA conspiracy theory just like Jewish space lasers and trump is fighting a pedophile cabal. Just because thousands of nutcases in MAQA yahoo echo chambers believe these whackadoodle conspiracy theories to be true doesn't make it so.
Why are you continuously talking about nonsense?
FYP
GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 08, 2025 9:22 am Where is this Grays Landing place in Portland? They don't seem to like the protests. Granted, luckily the ICE building doesn't seem to be near at lot of things in Portland, other than the poor folks who live in that complex.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yenwklgdyo
Impossible. The left, parroted by 88 and Kalm, have insisted the protests are all peaceful."It's like a war zone," Ms Hammar, 57, says about her street. Several other residents spoke to BBC News about the unrest, which is centred on just one city block, as tensions have boiled..
BDK, grasping at straws.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Oct 08, 2025 11:34 amGannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 08, 2025 9:22 am Where is this Grays Landing place in Portland? They don't seem to like the protests. Granted, luckily the ICE building doesn't seem to be near at lot of things in Portland, other than the poor folks who live in that complex.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yenwklgdyoImpossible. The left, parroted by 88 and Kalm, have insisted the protests are all peaceful."It's like a war zone," Ms Hammar, 57, says about her street. Several other residents spoke to BBC News about the unrest, which is centred on just one city block, as tensions have boiled..
Fellow dog owner Mai Tai Boyd, 44, tells Ms Colgrove that he disagrees that their building has been "abandoned" by local city officials.
"I keep up with the politics. So I feel a little different," says Mr Boyd, who has lived in the building for 13 years.
The US Air Force veteran says Trump's plan to send in the troops is a blatant violation of the US constitution.
"I don't understand why law enforcement can't handle it. Like why do you need to send the troops - combat trained and ready?"
In other parts of the famously liberal "Rose City", life goes on as normal. On Sunday, over 12,000 people participated in the Portland Marathon, jogging past the ICE facility without incident.
Clearly you’re so triggered you’ve posted the same thing in 3 different threads.
Like you've never posted the same thing in multiple threads.
Ask and thou shalt receive ...GannonFan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 2:05 pm I know it's for effect and better meme creation, but what does the place look like at night? I think it's been fairly widely reported that the benign protesters during the day are not at all like the protestors that come out at night. Sure, it's still generally just around that block or so, but it's certainly not genteel old people holding signs at night.
In an extraordinary move, a federal grand jury has refused to indict a couple arrested while legally carrying firearms and protesting at the Broadview ICE facility last month in a case federal authorities used to paint the two as a pair of “armed rioters.”
...
U.S. Magistrate Judge Gabriel Fuentes on Wednesday agreed to dismiss charges against Ray Collins and Jocelyn Robledo after a grand jury returned a “no bill” in the case, or a formal refusal to indict the couple based on the evidence presented in the case.
“I’ve been practicing law for 54 years and I’ve never had another client with no bill returned,” said Richard Kling, an attorney representing Collins. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime for me.”
...
On Wednesday, citing the adage that a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich, Kling told Block Club that prosecutors apparently had “less evidence than a ham sandwich” against his client.
In her oral ruling from the bench, Perry said National Guard troops are “not trained in de-escalation or other extremely important law enforcement functions that would help to quell these problems,” and that allowing troops to come into Chicago “will only add fuel to the fire that the defendants themselves have started.”
The judge also said the Trump administration’s attempts to characterize protesters as violent rebels “cannot be aligned” with the view of local officials. Perry said she had no faith in the declarations of federal officials submitted to the court due in large part to a growing body of evidence that the Department of Homeland Security’s views are “simply unreliable.”
Perry cited several assault cases that had been dismissed against protesters and other orders from federal judges in Chicago entered against DHS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“In the last 48 hours in four separate unrelated legal decisions from different neutral parties, they all cast significant doubt on DHS’s assessment of what is happening on the streets of Chicago,” Perry said.
Perry also said a rebellion is defined as “a deliberate organized resistance openly opposing the laws and government as a whole” by means of armed violence. “I have found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion in the state of Illinois.”
As I've said before, the courts are doing what the courts will do. Trump was never going to be able to send in military forces at will in the vast majority of the country. The rest of the country isn't like D.C. .UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:16 pm Federal judge blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Chicago
In her oral ruling from the bench, Perry said National Guard troops are “not trained in de-escalation or other extremely important law enforcement functions that would help to quell these problems,” and that allowing troops to come into Chicago “will only add fuel to the fire that the defendants themselves have started.”
The judge also said the Trump administration’s attempts to characterize protesters as violent rebels “cannot be aligned” with the view of local officials. Perry said she had no faith in the declarations of federal officials submitted to the court due in large part to a growing body of evidence that the Department of Homeland Security’s views are “simply unreliable.”
Perry cited several assault cases that had been dismissed against protesters and other orders from federal judges in Chicago entered against DHS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
“In the last 48 hours in four separate unrelated legal decisions from different neutral parties, they all cast significant doubt on DHS’s assessment of what is happening on the streets of Chicago,” Perry said.
Perry also said a rebellion is defined as “a deliberate organized resistance openly opposing the laws and government as a whole” by means of armed violence. “I have found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion in the state of Illinois.”
So far yes but we still have to see how SCOTUS rules if it gets that far.GannonFan wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 6:50 amAs I've said before, the courts are doing what the courts will do. Trump was never going to be able to send in military forces at will in the vast majority of the country. The rest of the country isn't like D.C. .UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:16 pm Federal judge blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Chicago
I'm fine acknowledging that the courts are working until they are proven that they aren't. Given recent rulings it would be a drastic departure if SCOTUS reversed something like this.
There are two factors that worry me about this:
