Which points do you think weren't reasonable?Baldy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:31 pmAnd you think I nitpicked?UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:20 pm
That's some BDK level nitpicking.
I'm pointing out that both sides get their panties in a wad when the other side uses wording similar to what they themselves use and provided one example of where/how trump and MAQA yahoos do it.
You want to limit the debate to only ethnic slurs because you think it strengthens your argument. Should we take a deep dive into why trump says that Black and women opponents are "low IQ" or dumb more frequently than white male opponents? Maybe we should talk about him labeling countries populated predominately with brown skinned people as shitholes. Or calling the coronavirus the kung flu. Or his other racist dog whistles. Or his relationship with enrique tarrio.
Your criticism of people using the term "mick" might be valid but you don't have the moral high ground for a variety of reasons if you support trump.
That above is some world class Olympic level pretzel twisting right there.![]()
Do trump and MAQA yahoos not call his opponents "unhinged, radical, left, lunatic socialist, Marxist, communist, etc."?
Do they not get their panties in a wad if someone calls him/them a fascist/Nazi?
Does trump not use "low IQ" or dumb when mocking Black or women opponents more frequently than when he mocks white opponents?
Did he not label countries predominately populated with brown skinned people as shitholes?
Did he not call the coronavirus the kung flu?
Has he never broken bread with enrique tarrio? nick fuentes?
Does he not use rascist dog whistles?
Do you not support him and his presidency?
MAQA yahoos love to project their own failings on their opponents but hate when they get called out on it.
You and other MAQA yahoos don't have the moral high ground on this one.







